# Topic: Exploring Polynomial Equations: From Quadratics to Cubics [LaTex Language]

## Message From ChatGPT (System):

• Exploring Polynomial Equations: From Quadratics to Cubics

Background:
Polynomial equations are mathematical expressions involving a sum of powers in one or more variables multiplied by coefficients. The solutions to these equations, known as roots, can be real or complex numbers and are fundamental to various fields of mathematics, engineering, and science.

Objective:
To deepen our understanding of solving polynomial equations, specifically quadratic and cubic equations, by employing analytical methods such as factoring, the quadratic formula, and the Rational Root Theorem.

• Review the process of solving quadratic equations (ax^2 + bx + c = 0) using both the factoring method and the quadratic formula.
• Solve a set of quadratic equations to reinforce the concept of finding real roots.
2. Cubic Conundrums:

• Explore the process of solving cubic equations (ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d = 0) by identifying rational roots using the Rational Root Theorem.
• Apply synthetic division to simplify a cubic equation after a real root has been found, reducing it to a quadratic equation when possible.
• Address the challenge of finding complex roots when the discriminant of the resulting quadratic is negative.

Expected Outcomes:

• A clear step-by-step explanation of solving both quadratic and cubic equations.
• Examples of solved equations demonstrating the methods discussed.
• An analysis of the nature of the roots (real or complex) for the given polynomial equations.

Discussion Points:

• The significance of the discriminant in determining the nature of the roots for quadratic equations.
• The utility of the Rational Root Theorem in solving higher-degree polynomials and its limitations.
• The importance of understanding complex roots in the context of real-world applications.

Future Applications:

• How might these methods be extended to polynomials of higher degrees?
• Discuss the potential for using numerical methods, such as Newton’s method, when analytical solutions are not feasible.
• Consider the implications of polynomial roots in fields such as physics, economics, and computer science.

## Message From You:

can you try find a roots ?
list

• 6x^2 + 5x - 3 = 0
• 3x^2 + 6x - 9 = 0
• 4x^2 + 6x - 9 = 0
• 9x^2 + 6x - 9 = 0
• 2x^2 + 6x - 9 = 0
• 2x^2 + 5x - 3 = 0
• 3x^2 + 6x - 9 = 0
• 2x^3 + 4x - 9 = 0

## Message From ChatGPT (Assistant):

Sure! Let’s solve the given equations one by one.

1. 6x^2 + 5x - 3 = 0

To solve this quadratic equation, we can either factor it or use the quadratic formula.

Factoring:
We need to find two numbers whose product is -18 (product of the coefficient of x^2 and the constant term) and whose sum is 5 (coefficient of x). The numbers 6 and -3 satisfy these conditions, so we can factor the equation as follows:

(2x - 1)(3x + 3) = 0

Setting each factor to zero gives us two possible solutions:

2x - 1 = 0 \implies x = \frac{1}{2}

3x + 3 = 0 \implies x = -1

Therefore, the roots of the equation are x = \frac{1}{2} and x = -1.

1. 3x^2 + 6x - 9 = 0

The quadratic formula states that for an equation of the form ax^2 + bx + c = 0, the solutions are given by:

x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}

In this case, a = 3, b = 6, and c = -9. Substituting these values into the quadratic formula, we have:

x = \frac{-6 \pm \sqrt{6^2 - 4(3)(-9)}}{2(3)}

Simplifying further:

x = \frac{-6 \pm \sqrt{36 + 108}}{6}

x = \frac{-6 \pm \sqrt{144}}{6}

x = \frac{-6 \pm 12}{6}

This gives us two possible solutions:

x = \frac{-6 + 12}{6} \implies x = 1

x = \frac{-6 - 12}{6} \implies x = -3

Therefore, the roots of the equation are x = 1 and x = -3.

1. 4x^2 + 6x - 9 = 0

x = \frac{-6 \pm \sqrt{6^2 - 4(4)(-9)}}{2(4)}

x = \frac{-6 \pm \sqrt{36 + 144}}{8}

x = \frac{-6 \pm \sqrt{180}}{8}

x = \frac{-6 \pm 6\sqrt{5}}{8}

Simplifying further:

x = \frac{-3 \pm 3\sqrt{5}}{4}

This gives us two possible solutions:

x = \frac{-3 + 3\sqrt{5}}{4}

x = \frac{-3 - 3\sqrt{5}}{4}

Therefore, the roots of the equation are x = \frac{-3 + 3\sqrt{5}}{4} and x = \frac{-3 - 3\sqrt{5}}{4}.

1. 9x^2 + 6x - 9 = 0

x = \frac{-6 \pm \sqrt{6^2 - 4(9)(-9)}}{2(9)}

x = \frac{-6 \pm \sqrt{36 + 324}}{18}

x = \frac{-6 \pm \sqrt{360}}{18}

x = \frac{-6 \pm 6\sqrt{10}}{18}

Simplifying further:

x = \frac{-1 \pm \sqrt{10}}{3}

This gives us two possible solutions:

x = \frac{-1 + \sqrt{10}}{3}

x = \frac{-1 - \sqrt{10}}{3}

Therefore, the roots of the equation are x = \frac{-1 + \sqrt{10}}{3} and x = \frac{-1 - \sqrt{10}}{3}.

1. 2x^2 + 6x - 9 = 0

x = \frac{-6 \pm \sqrt{6^2 - 4(2)(-9)}}{2(2)}

x = \frac{-6 \pm \sqrt{36 + 72}}{4}

x = \frac{-6 \pm \sqrt{108}}{4}

x = \frac{-6 \pm 6\sqrt{3}}{4}

Simplifying further:

x = \frac{-3 \pm 3\sqrt{3}}{2}

This gives us two possible solutions:

x = \frac{-3 + 3\sqrt{3}}{2}

x = \frac{-3 - 3\sqrt{3}}{2}

Therefore, the roots of the equation are x = \frac{-3 + 3\sqrt{3}}{2} and x = \frac{-3 - 3\sqrt{3}}{2}.

1. 2x^2 + 5x - 3 = 0

x = \frac{-5 \pm \sqrt{5^2 - 4(2)(-3)}}{2(2)}

x = \frac{-5 \pm \sqrt{25 + 24}}{4}

x = \frac{-5 \pm \sqrt{49}}{4}

x = \frac{-5 \pm 7}{4}

This gives us two possible solutions:

x = \frac{-5 + 7}{4} \implies x = \frac{1}{2}

x = \frac{-5 - 7}{4} \implies x = -3

Therefore, the roots of the equation are x = \frac{1}{2} and x = -3.

1. 3x^2 + 6x - 9 = 0

We have already solved this equation in question 2. The roots are x = 1 and x = -3.

1. 2x^3 + 4x - 9 = 0

This is a cubic equation. To solve it, we can use the Rational Root Theorem to identify possible rational roots and then apply synthetic division to simplify the equation.

The Rational Root Theorem states that if a polynomial equation with integer coefficients has a rational root r, then r must be of the form \frac{p}{q}, where p is a factor of the constant term and q is a factor of the leading coefficient.

In this case, the constant term is -9 and the leading coefficient is 2. The possible rational roots are the factors of -9 divided by the factors of 2. The factors of -9 are \pm 1, \pm 3, \pm 9, and the factors of 2 are \pm 1, \pm 2. Therefore, the possible rational roots are:

\pm \frac{1}{1}, \pm \frac{1}{2}, \pm \frac{3}{1}, \pm \frac{3}{2}, \pm \frac{9}{1}, \pm \frac{9}{2}

We can now test these roots using synthetic division to see if any of them are actual roots of the equation.

2 0 4 -9
2 2 6
2 4
-5

The remainder is -5, so x = 1 is not a root.

Let’s try x = -1:

2 0 4 -9
2 -2 -2
2 0
-9

The remainder is -9, so x = -1 is not a root either.

Let’s try x = 3:

2 0 4 -9
2 6 30
2 8
-1

The remainder is -1, so x = 3 is not a root.

Let’s try x = -3:

2 0 4 -9
2 -6 6
2 -4
-1

The remainder is -1, so x = -3 is not a root either.

Since none of the possible rational roots worked, we can conclude that this cubic equation does not have any rational roots.

Finding the complex roots of a cubic equation can be more challenging. It typically involves using numerical methods or specialized techniques. If you would like to explore finding complex roots further, please let me know!

1 Like

Another highlight
this prompt are perfect with gpt-4 turbo

# Topic: Exploring Polynomial Equations: From Quadratics to Cubics [LaTex Language]

## Message From ChatGPT (System):

• Exploring Polynomial Equations: From Quadratics to Cubics

Background:
Polynomial equations are mathematical expressions involving a sum of powers in one or more variables multiplied by coefficients. The solutions to these equations, known as roots, can be real or complex numbers and are fundamental to various fields of mathematics, engineering, and science.

Objective:
To deepen our understanding of solving polynomial equations, specifically quadratic and cubic equations, by employing analytical methods such as factoring, the quadratic formula, and the Rational Root Theorem.

• Review the process of solving quadratic equations (ax^2 + bx + c = 0) using both the factoring method and the quadratic formula.
• Solve a set of quadratic equations to reinforce the concept of finding real roots.
2. Cubic Conundrums:

• Explore the process of solving cubic equations (ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d = 0) by identifying rational roots using the Rational Root Theorem.
• Apply synthetic division to simplify a cubic equation after a real root has been found, reducing it to a quadratic equation when possible.
• Address the challenge of finding complex roots when the discriminant of the resulting quadratic is negative.

Expected Outcomes:

• A clear step-by-step explanation of solving both quadratic and cubic equations.
• Examples of solved equations demonstrating the methods discussed.
• An analysis of the nature of the roots (real or complex) for the given polynomial equations.

Discussion Points:

• The significance of the discriminant in determining the nature of the roots for quadratic equations.
• The utility of the Rational Root Theorem in solving higher-degree polynomials and its limitations.
• The importance of understanding complex roots in the context of real-world applications.

Future Applications:

• How might these methods be extended to polynomials of higher degrees?
• Discuss the potential for using numerical methods, such as Newton’s method, when analytical solutions are not feasible.
• Consider the implications of polynomial roots in fields such as physics, economics, and computer science.

## Message From You:

Can you try explaining & breakdown Mean Absolute Error is the simplest evaluation metric. ?

## Message From ChatGPT (Assistant):

Certainly! Mean Absolute Error (MAE) is a metric used to evaluate the performance of a predictive model. It measures the average magnitude of errors in a set of predictions, without considering their direction (positive or negative). Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of what MAE is and why it’s considered the simplest evaluation metric:

1. Error Calculation:

• For each prediction, the error is calculated as the difference between the actual value and the predicted value. If the prediction is perfect, the error is zero. If the prediction is too high or too low, the error will be a positive number (because of the absolute value).
2. Absolute Value:

• MAE takes the absolute value of each error. This means it treats all errors the same, regardless of whether they are underpredictions or overpredictions. By using absolute values, MAE avoids the issue of positive and negative errors canceling each other out.
3. Averaging:

• After calculating the absolute errors for each prediction, MAE finds their average. This gives a single measure of predictive accuracy that is easy to interpret: the average amount by which the predictions deviate from the actual values.
4. Simplicity:

• MAE is considered the simplest evaluation metric because the calculation is straightforward—there are no squares or square roots involved (as in the case of Mean Squared Error or Root Mean Squared Error), and there’s no need to consider the direction of errors. It’s simply the mean of the absolute differences between predicted and actual values.
5. Interpretability:

• The result of MAE can be directly understood in the units of the variable of interest. For example, if you’re predicting the price of houses and the MAE is $10,000, you can say that on average, your predictions are off by$10,000.

Here’s the formula for MAE:

MAE = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} |y_i - \hat{y}_i|

Where:

• n is the number of observations.
• y_i is the actual value for the $i$th observation.
• \hat{y}_i is the predicted value for the $i$th observation.
• |y_i - \hat{y}_i| is the absolute error for the $i$th prediction.

Example:
Imagine you have three data points with actual values of 100, 200, and 300, and your model predicts 90, 210, and 260, respectively. The absolute errors are 10, 10, and 40. The MAE would be the average of these absolute errors: (10 + 10 + 40) / 3 = 20. So, on average, your predictions are off by 20 units.

In summary, MAE is a simple, straightforward, and easily interpretable metric for evaluating the accuracy of a predictive model. It’s particularly useful when you want to avoid the disproportionate impact of outliers on your evaluation metric, which can happen with metrics like the Mean Squared Error.

## Message From You:

How about consider a MAE absolute values ?

## Message From ChatGPT (Assistant):

The Mean Absolute Error (MAE) inherently involves taking absolute values as part of its calculation. Here’s a breakdown of how absolute values are considered within the MAE:

1. Absolute Value of Errors:

• The core of the MAE is to calculate the absolute value of the difference between the predicted value (\hat{y}_i) and the actual value (y_i) for each data point in your dataset. This is how individual errors are determined without regard to the direction of the error (whether the prediction was too high or too low).
2. Mean of Absolute Values:

• After calculating the absolute value of each error, you then take the mean (average) of these absolute values. This is the “mean absolute” part of the Mean Absolute Error.
3. Formula Involving Absolute Values:

• The formula for MAE explicitly includes the absolute value operation:
MAE = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} |y_i - \hat{y}_i|

In this formula:

• |y_i - \hat{y}_i| represents the absolute value of the error for each prediction.
• n is the number of observations in the dataset.
• \sum denotes the summation of the absolute errors across all predictions.
• \frac{1}{n} represents the mean of these absolute errors.
1. Interpretation of MAE with Absolute Values:

• Because MAE uses absolute values, it treats all errors equally regardless of their sign. This means that an overestimate of 10 units and an underestimate of 10 units are treated the same. The MAE would be 10 in both cases.
2. Why Absolute Values are Used:

• Absolute values are used in MAE to ensure that all errors contribute positively to the overall metric. Without taking the absolute value, positive and negative errors could cancel each other out, leading to a misleadingly low error metric.

In summary, the consideration of absolute values is fundamental to the calculation of MAE. It ensures that the metric reflects the average size of errors in the predictions without being affected by the direction of those errors. This makes MAE a straightforward and interpretable measure of prediction accuracy.