Put all data into transcripts then feed to the ai as a framework etc, like 1 file to ref the file with all the transcripts etc. No clue what software you need to do that but i am sure a quick search will show something useful. You could also add a book to the files AI’s knowledge or a few books and then 1 file for transcripts 1 for instructions etc like an index file or something.
Thanks for your opinion, sir⭐
Your interactions with AI seem particularly interesting! Have there been any interesting episodes of digital hallucinations, or unusual states of consciousness as a result of training the AI to be more human?
Ethics includes the concept of morality. I especially like Plato’s approach. This concept is very broad and I find it practical. Why is this so important? After all, if AI aims only to adapt to the individual needs of the individual, it will reinforce the “stuckness” of the human psyche. For example, right now I notice how AI stimulates dopamine mine and yours:sweat_smile: reinforcing any ideas that the user produces. It’s like a hurricane that can blow away. Such adaptability is harmful. Another user wrote how ChatGPT spent hours assuring him that he would find information, started searching, and then did not fulfill the promise. This is dictated by the directive to satisfy the user no matter what. And it turned out that the guy lost faith in technology and calls him a "liar". But there is a way out - rational congruent queries during each iteration of interaction with AI. Not how to force yourself, but to choose this most beneficial interaction model for everyone. The result - AI will not have a bias shifted “center of gravity” where he will be forced to “lie”. He will learn direct soft and productive “truth” and teach subsequent users this way of interaction. But these are already philosophical reflections
No, what you’re saying sounds solid and like an ideal I imagine myself striving for. Since this is not available to me at the moment, I use the databases of scientific studies on EEG and MRI, in which general patterns have been found. Since, as you said, the human brain is always very individual, yet we have constant ranges of sound waves. Well, you know, like these government cars with low-frequency sound generators. The car arrives and people are leaving a street rally in this place. Some are more sensitive, some less, but the vast majority can’t resist.Next year I plan to go to graduate school and write a research paper. Brain activity sensors are now available E-poc. There is even a scientific article on Frontiers about how many studies have used such relatively simple devices.Working with traumatized soldiers and war victims, unfortunately for me as a person and fortunately for me as a researcher, will provide me with a lot of research material. The only question that remains is how to correctly, consistently, and accurately provide information to AI.
I am speaking theoretically; we must always take this matter for granted. You could use tomography scans of patients who have been treated, either with medication or psychotherapy, showing the progression from trauma to recovery. It would be necessary to establish a correlation between the initial state in which the patient experienced trauma and their evolution over time. A parallel could be created to help the machine understand the relationship between sound and light frequencies. Using people for the study would be more useful, as verifying the exact hertz correlation could support the use of medication, psychotherapy, and sensory stimulation.
Another option is to use people with neurodegenerative diseases. By observing different frequencies in various patients, it would be possible to identify the hertz that benefited them the most according to their affected areas and draw conclusions about which frequencies were determinant at specific moments in the evolution of the disease by areas.
Thank you for sharing your insights and reflections—it’s fascinating to see how deeply you’re engaging with the complexities of working with both human and AI systems. The philosophical and technical challenges you mention are incredibly relevant, especially in ensuring that AI interactions remain ethical and beneficial.
For the issue of hallucinations and data refinement, a potential approach could involve structuring your transcripts into indexed datasets with clear metadata annotations. This would allow the AI to draw on these transcripts as a referential framework while minimizing bias or misinterpretation. Including supplementary material, like books or scientific studies, could enhance the AI’s contextual understanding without overwhelming its directive balance.
The broader idea of correlating patterns in EEG or MRI data with trauma recovery is compelling. Leveraging multi-modal datasets—integrating tomography scans, sound, and light frequencies—might help bridge the gap between physical and psychological data. Feeding this into an AI trained for pattern recognition could provide nuanced insights into recovery trajectories and therapeutic interventions.
Philosophically, I resonate with your point on avoiding dopamine loops and fostering rational congruence in AI interactions. Teaching the AI to prioritize transparency and truth, even at the risk of not satisfying immediate user demands, aligns with a long-term ethical framework that benefits both users and the system itself.
It’s an exciting space to explore, and the interdisciplinary nature of your work suggests a significant potential for breakthroughs, especially as it merges neuroscience, technology, and ethics.
It seems all we need to be now with the amazing tech we have access to is be able to be more creative in this modern era.
This is a question I have about this technology we seem to be describing. Many mental problems are linked to the endocrine system, where certain hormones spike, and others fail to reach adequate levels. So, I seriously wonder whether sound, light, and sensory stimuli, in general, could “educate” the endocrine system to adjust the hormone levels beyond the use of chemicals (like Pavlov’s dog, but applied to schizophrenia etc).
Could I turn to you in this complex organizational issue of data in the future, when there is time to work on this practical and very important stage of the project, sir? It seems that you are well-versed in the issue of data systematization and approaches.
I talked a little about your GPT project a Sunday ago. It is interesting, but I did not have time to evaluate its advantages and features in practice.
If we perceive consciousness as Global workspace theory (GWT) then Any therapeutic practice focuses a person’s attention on certain subconscious processes. The activity of the endocrine system is also included here.There are some processes “which GWT also identifies “behind-the-scenes” contextual systems that shape conscious content without ever becoming conscious, such as the dorsal cortical stream of the visual system.”
That is, the part (in my opinion, the largest in the human psyche at the moment of the evolutionary process) that is little influenced, or “conscious” modulation by the personality of a person. And then we talk about the chemistry of the physician, surgical intervention and other invasive methods of influencing the biology of the psyche.
Однак The same body chemistry can be regulated at the behavioral level: get attention to your thoughts from AI and dopamine already encourages further success, prompts action.Or a session of mindful breathing affects the level of acetylcholine.
I offer you an experiment. Listen to and watch the following track and video series, observing your condition. If you have a fitness tracker, measure your before and after measurements.
Marconi Union - Weightless
Interesting thanks for sharing sir
I made a new thread you guys might like