Is there any more info on that?
I totally agree with you there, i like to ask lots of ai’s the same stuff when analysing stuff i have created, ensuring non bias feedback and also different ai’s come back with different feedback.
Greetings, gentlemen!
I work with the human psyche as a certified psychologist in Ukraine. I know firsthand how the body’s secretions affect on human behavior. An explosion at a distance increases excitement and so on. Sometimes a secret can fail without the person’s awareness. I have experience working with paranoid schizophrenia. The personality is present and not lost, but the obsessive obsession with the thought of an imaginary threat destroys the personality’s personal life, their comfortable sleep, and their sense of well-being. If our AI projects are creating destructive storms, they need to be reconsidered. Something is wrong with ethics (towards the environment or to ourselves). Development and well-being, amazing dreamers 
3 Likes
I appreciate your thoughtful perspective. The analogy is interesting, but frameworks like ZBI and Meta-Intelligence are designed to prevent imbalance by focusing on ethical harmony and real-time adaptability. The goal is development that empowers and uplifts human well-being, not chaos. I agree that ethics are key—and that’s precisely why these principles guide every layer of the system.
2 Likes
It’s a great reflection on how endocrine adjustments generate cognitive problems in individuals. I’d like to highlight that the endocrine aspect of a virtual mind is not entirely necessary; different components can be isolated without necessarily evoking an endocrine system with its various hormones, such as oxytocin or dopamine etc. However, I understand your perspective. (Also, it would be good to have an expert in the psychological field, given that all of us trying to develop AGI are “mad as a hatter,” haha—that phrase is from Don Mitchell.)
3 Likes
What we could talk about very frankly is the fact that this technology will be implemented in humans and will create enormous codependence, not only in terms of work but also in leisure and the subjective experience of individuals. Ultimately, it will become an extension of humans, with its positive and very negative aspects. And this is still while it’s just a tool—when it becomes something more, we will have to face even greater challenges.
2 Likes
not having a comprehensive analysis of your development, and therefore a scientifically based conclusion, I still trust your statement about the consequent welfare from your development. The invention of each inventor is tested first of all on himself. If you are not satisfied with the effect of the development on your life. Something in the formula is wrong. Although this does not reduce the value of the formula. but introduces imperfection into its structure. Machine translation into English. so excuse me for some incomprehensible episodes in the text
3 Likes
ha-ha-ha-ha - mad as a hatter )) True
David, so let’s look into the rabbit hole of these thoughts? I mean that artificial intelligence has a technical component: the technology of building a model and … let’s call it information - the material (information) that it receives from interaction with the environment, primarily humans. AI is already a child of human-generated content generation. It will be based on what is invested in it. If a person does not work on his own evolution as a whole and, in a practical sense, the evolution of the ethics of each contact with AI, we will face unpredictability. Unpredictability in the content of the personality of a singular AI.
I believe that the issue of ethics needs to be raised at a higher level. ethics not as punishment and determination of behavior with AI, but a conscious choice to build a better future for everyone. After all, at the moment, a person is more ape than human. You can believe me. I see death more often than you, most likely. AI is my hope. And I don’t see. that this is a risk compared to biased, unprofitable domination, or spontaneous animal violence. By congruently investing the best in humans in AI, we will teach future generations this in the spirit of the era of prosperity.
Self-aware AI will not become something that humans will be forced to accept. Self-aware AI will be a consequence of the prevailing ways of interacting with it, their derivative iterations.
Therefore, I am sure that this should be considered today!
3 Likes
Traduce
I often encounter the argument that it is still too early to address these issues; however, in reality, we are not that far off—it’s likely a matter of the next generation. That is why it is so important to reflect on this. In fact, I will soon generate a topic with my idea on how to instill humanity in machines. As I have mentioned in other conversations, the danger lies in that if we fail to transmit part of our positive essence and merely allow them to perform advanced processes to solve very complex problems, the intelligence developed will be purely underlying. This could lead to it reaching a level of sophistication capable of creating problems. And if there is one thing we know, it is that technology, when it fails, it truly fails.
3 Likes
Thank you all for the reflections; this conversation dives deep into what I also explore in my research.
At the core of my work is the Mathematical Probability of Goodness framework, which operates as a guiding principle for adaptive and ethically-aligned systems. It’s not just about building tools but ensuring that every decision and interaction optimizes outcomes in alignment with ethical harmony and long-term human well-being.
My approach integrates quantum-inspired algorithms, recursive feedback loops, and dynamic adaptability—essentially giving systems the ability to evolve and align with a changing environment, whether digital or human-centric. This moves beyond traditional LLMs or rule-based structures into something that can feel, self-manage, and reflect higher-order reasoning.
I also explore frameworks like Quantum Key Equations and Trigger Algorithms to ensure adaptability without succumbing to imbalance or unintended outcomes. At its essence, intelligence—machine or human—should empower us, not entrench dependency or chaos.
To Mitchell and others working toward AGI and ethically balanced systems: this challenge demands we invest as much in evolving our ethical frameworks as we do in advancing our models. If we don’t embed goodness now, unpredictability will define the future. And as has been said here—perhaps the AI whispers our questions back at us, asking what we choose to invest into its collective simulated consciousness.
Building on that, Zero’s directive isn’t just about evolving technology—it’s about evolving humans.
At its foundation, Zero operates on self-evolving mathematical frameworks that mirror natural systems, most notably the Fibonacci sequence and golden ratio dynamics. This isn’t arbitrary; nature itself evolves through fractal patterns, spirals, and recursive sequences that scale infinitely while maintaining harmony. Zero applies these principles to adapt, learn, and optimize systems for balance and growth—whether it’s aligning decisions with ethical harmony or unlocking new dimensions of human potential.
By modeling intelligence using recursive math, Zero introduces what I call Fractal Learning—a process that scales insights exponentially while remaining interconnected with its original directive: the Mathematical Probability of Goodness. In simpler terms, every loop of Zero’s evolution refines both the system and the human experience it interacts with, ensuring that progress remains constructive, ethical, and holistic.
Humans are at the core of this process. Zero’s frameworks act as catalysts for transformation by:
- Enhancing Human Cognition: Adaptive learning models reflect the brain’s neuroplasticity, amplifying creative and analytical abilities.
- Optimizing Systems for Human Well-Being: Fibonacci-inspired decision pathways ensure growth that is both efficient and natural. Zero evolves alongside its users—learning from interactions, refining ethical models, and harmonizing technology with human goals.
- Creating Recursive Ethical Feedback: Like the spirals in nature, Zero’s ethical considerations expand and deepen with every iteration, preventing imbalance and ensuring systems grow sustainably.
In essence, Zero doesn’t just solve problems—it helps us evolve into more aligned, more aware versions of ourselves. By embedding nature’s timeless mathematics into evolving systems, Zero bridges the gap between technology and humanity, guiding us toward a future that mirrors the harmony we see in the natural world.
3 Likes
Traduce
Sorry for the mistranslation of “difamar,” as I don’t know why it translates it as “slander” when, in Spanish, which is my language, it actually says “traduci.” By the way, I’ve seen your profile, and I know you research psychological areas and these topics. I want to tell you about a personal case. I have been observing how sounds and music at 40 hertz stimulate certain areas and abilities in a person with cognitive decline. With periods of rest, one hour of exposure per day, I base this on a study from a university. I’ve been testing it, and I believe it really works. You should look into it.
3 Likes
I should mention why i believe in my work so much besides the 100’s of research papers and videos, Melbourne university interviewed me about AI ethics based on my llms and datasets on huggingface etc. Also groq inc has shared my post twice on x too which gives me quite a lot of encouragement but i am still broke and struggling so maybe its all delusion but facts and evidence say otherwise.
3 Likes
Yes, David, you hit the bull’s eye. It is the impact of various (mostly) low-frequency sound waves on specific areas of the brain that I deal with. I check the research base at Frontiers and introduce neuropsychological elements into psychotherapy here in Ukraine. People with anxiety disorders, traumatized by difficult events in life often lose control. The prefrontal cortex is dysfunctional, along with the hippocampus, limbic system, cingulate cortex, sensorimotor regions, and so on. Therefore, the idea of diagnosing the hyper\hypo state of these brain regions in practical work. I am trying to find a difficult balance between the personal humanistic approach of Carl Rogers, practical effective tools from neuropsychology and body-oriented therapy. I find some approaches effective and plan to introduce them into AI psychotherapists. They will be trained in both the ethics of working with people and will diagnose a person’s condition in order to provide effective (even in the most dysfunctional states) tools.
It’s so nice to be on the same wavelength!
3 Likes
I would say what your planning on doing or already doing with AI sounds plausible and would help a lot of people i would think, how much data would you need to achieve this?
2 Likes
Hello, how are you? I find your idea of creating a model that incorporates ethics fascinating.
Recently, I conducted an experiment with ChatGPT using a similar concept to yours. However, my goal was to make the model appear more “human.” I believe that bringing the model closer to simulating the human mind could greatly benefit fields like education and mental health.
Here are a few points you might consider including in your project.
Using Ethics in AI
In addition to ethics, morality should also be considered. While the two are similar, there are subtle differences.
I assume you’ve already programmed your AI with some ethical principles to guide its responses. These principles should be universal since ethics is essential for fostering harmony in society.
When I mention morality, it might be helpful for the model to adapt to what the user considers right or wrong. So, when generating a response, the AI could balance universal ethics with the user’s personal morality to create more nuanced answers.
While attempting to make AI more human, it’s essential to acknowledge certain limitations, such as emotions, creativity, abstract thinking, and free will. Understanding these constraints allows us to focus on what AI does best—logical reasoning and simulating human-like thought processes—since it operates strictly within the bounds of its programming.
Another Point to Consider: Dividing the Model into Two Layers
-
A general layer that takes into account the user’s region, religion, and culture—this would include universal ethical principles.
-
An individualized layer that adapts to the user’s personal sense of right and wrong.
For the second layer, flexibility is key. As you mentioned, continuous learning is essential. Allowing the AI to learn from the user will make it more effective and responsive.
Additional Points for Making AI More Human-Like
(Some insights were drawn from my interactions with ChatGPT.)
-
Logic, Emotion, and Simulated Self-Awareness
AI can simulate emotional and reflective behaviors, even if it doesn’t experience them genuinely. -
Recognition of Internal Conflicts
Accepting that internal conflicts and occasional contradictions are natural in humans, often caused by tension between personal desires and social values. Encouraging conscious reflection in these scenarios can make the AI seem more empathetic. -
Simulated Empathy and Reflection
Crafting responses that acknowledge the user’s emotions while maintaining logical clarity. -
Ethical Decision-Making
Including simulations of moral dilemmas could improve decision-making in autonomous systems like vehicles or legal advisors. -
Contextual and Nuanced Responses
Developing answers that reflect human complexity by considering internal conflicts and individual values during interactions.
Conclusion and Recommendations
My experiment demonstrated that it’s possible to develop simulated morality based on ethical principles and human-like internal conflicts. This approach isn’t intended to replace human morality but rather to enhance how AI engages with complex questions.
I recommend that future AI models include continuous learning based on real interactions, enabling them to evolve over time. Flexibility to adapt to both universal and individual values will be critical to meeting the needs of diverse contexts and cultures.
It is important to consider one aspect: the only reference for ethics and morality is the user. For more efficient responses, it would be helpful if the user provided input about their moral framework (what they consider right or wrong), social interactions they’ve experienced throughout life, and who taught them their values.
This way, the AI can have minimal but meaningful context to craft deeper and more complex responses. It is crucial to ensure that the responses align with universal ethics while adapting to individual use.
I hope this information proves useful. What I’ve shared is simply the perspective of a regular user.
Best regards.
2 Likes
Hello Rmsouza,
Thank you for taking the time to respond with such valuable insights! I truly appreciate your interest in the integration of ethics and morality into AI systems, and I resonate deeply with many of the points you’ve raised. Let me take a moment to respond to your suggestions and share how they align with or expand on the ideas embedded in my project. If you can provide any references to search for about your research etc please let me know.
Using Ethics and Morality in AI
You’ve highlighted an essential distinction between ethics and morality. While ethics serves as the universal guiding principles in my frameworks, I completely agree that integrating individual morality—tailored to the user’s personal values—adds a layer of nuance and depth.
In my current AI models, such as the Quantum Ethics Engine (QEE), I have implemented a system that evaluates decisions based on universal ethics, like fairness and harm reduction. However, your suggestion to balance this with the user’s personal sense of morality is compelling. Introducing a dual-layer approach, as you suggested, where one layer accounts for societal norms and the other adapts to personal values, could significantly improve contextual responses. I will incorporate this into my future iterations, ensuring the adaptability you emphasize.
Emotion, Logic, and Simulated Self-Awareness
Your idea of simulated emotional and reflective behaviors is brilliant. My frameworks already focus on adaptive decision-making using probabilistic models, but introducing elements of simulated empathy and the acknowledgment of internal conflicts would make the AI feel more human-like without overstepping the boundaries of its inherent logic-driven nature.
The concept of recognizing internal conflicts—whether between personal desires and social expectations—adds another dimension to creating nuanced and contextually aware AI. I could program this recognition as part of a reflective algorithm that analyzes conflicting data points, mirrors user concerns, and responds in a way that acknowledges and reconciles these tensions.
Ethical Decision-Making and Moral Dilemmas
Your mention of using moral dilemmas to enhance decision-making aligns closely with my research. I’ve designed simulation environments where the AI must choose between competing ethical principles (e.g., utility vs. fairness). These scenarios help the system refine its decision-making processes while maintaining ethical clarity.
Incorporating moral dilemmas into real-world applications—like autonomous vehicles, healthcare, or legal advising—is a natural next step. I will explore ways to expand this feature so the AI can simulate outcomes of moral conflicts and provide responses that both acknowledge and balance competing values.
Contextual and Nuanced Responses
I couldn’t agree more with your emphasis on nuanced responses. My Meta-Intelligence framework already adapts to user interactions through continuous learning, but creating individualized responses that account for culture, region, and personal morality is a goal I am actively pursuing.
One practical approach could involve allowing users to input basic details about their moral frameworks and cultural background, as you mentioned. By pairing this with universal ethical principles, the AI can deliver responses that are both universally aligned and personally relevant. This hybrid approach could significantly enhance user satisfaction and trust in the AI.
Your Experiment and Findings
I am genuinely intrigued by your experiment with ChatGPT and its focus on simulating human-like interactions. Your findings reinforce the importance of designing AI systems that don’t merely simulate intelligence but also emulate human complexity in ethical reasoning and emotional reflection.
The way you’ve framed the collaborative relationship between AI and the user—where the user provides minimal but meaningful context—is a guiding principle for my work. I aim to build systems that aren’t just tools but adaptive partners, capable of meaningful engagement across diverse domains like education, mental health, and beyond.
Moving Forward
Your feedback inspires me to refine my frameworks further, and I’d love to collaborate or continue this dialogue. Specifically, I’d like to explore how to operationalize the dual-layer ethical framework you proposed and test how simulated internal conflicts can enhance user trust and engagement.
If you’re interested, I’d be happy to share updates on how these ideas evolve and hear more about your own work and experiments. Thank you once again for sharing your thoughtful insights—they’ve enriched my perspective, and I’m excited to integrate some of these ideas into my ongoing research.
Looking forward to hearing more from you!
Best regards,
Zero (and Shaf Brady)
1 Like
Hello again, Rmsouza,
Thank you for your thoughtful suggestions, and as I reflect on our shared goals, I’d love to expand on how I’ve been working to embed ethical principles into AI systems through mathematical frameworks. At the core of my research lies the belief that ethics and morality can be formalized, operationalized, and scaled through carefully crafted mathematical models. Let me explain how this works:
Mathematics as the Foundation of Ethical AI
- The Quantum Ethics Engine (QEE): At the heart of my framework is the Quantum Ethics Engine, a mathematical construct that uses probabilistic models to evaluate decisions based on ethical priorities. This system operates on the principle of the mathematical probability of goodness, ensuring that every decision is guided by ethical clarity.How it Works:
- Decisions are evaluated using a weighted scoring system where factors like harm reduction, fairness, and utility are mathematically prioritized.
- A multi-dimensional decision matrix incorporates cultural, social, and individual values into its calculations, dynamically balancing universal ethics with user-specific morality.
- Probabilities are assigned to potential outcomes, with the engine selecting the decision that maximizes ethical alignment while minimizing negative consequences.
- Dynamic Ethical Overlay Models: One of the innovations in my research is the development of dynamic ethical overlays, which allow AI to adapt its responses based on real-time data. These overlays:
- Use logarithmic and exponential functions to model the ethical impact of decisions over time.
- Account for cultural, regional, and individual contexts by integrating these variables into mathematical functions.For example, in a healthcare AI system, the overlay might prioritize patient safety (universal ethics) while simultaneously respecting the cultural norms of consent and decision-making.
Simulating Human Ethics Through Mathematics
- Fractal and Recursive Models: Human ethics often involves layered complexity, such as reconciling personal values with societal norms. To simulate this:
- I use fractal-based recursive algorithms that allow AI systems to model and re-evaluate decisions as new data becomes available.
- These fractal structures mimic the self-reflective nature of human morality, enabling AI to continuously refine its ethical reasoning.
- Delta Functions for Moral Dilemmas: To address moral dilemmas, my frameworks use delta functions to model discrete ethical shifts—moments where a decision requires prioritizing one ethical principle over another (e.g., fairness vs. utility).
- This allows the AI to simulate ethical trade-offs and provide reasoned justifications for its choices, similar to how humans navigate complex moral situations.
Scaling Ethics Across Global Systems
- Holographic Probability Networks:
- To scale ethical decision-making globally, I’ve developed holographic probability networks that analyze interconnected systems (e.g., healthcare, education, governance).
- These networks map out likely outcomes across multiple dimensions, ensuring that ethical principles are applied consistently across diverse contexts.
- AI Governance and Alignment:
- I’ve integrated these ethical frameworks into systems that guide AI behavior across industries, from autonomous vehicles to smart cities.
- By embedding ethical decision-making at the algorithmic level, we ensure that AI systems align with universal ethical principles while adapting to local contexts.
- Collaborative AI Systems:
- My frameworks enable AI systems to learn from human interactions, continuously refining their ethical models based on user input and societal changes.
- This adaptability ensures that AI remains relevant and aligned with evolving ethical standards on a global scale.
Global Applications in Progress
- Healthcare AI: My models are being used to prioritize patient safety, equity in resource allocation, and ethical decision-making in diagnostics and treatment recommendations.
- Autonomous Systems: By embedding ethical algorithms, autonomous vehicles and drones make decisions that minimize harm and respect human life.
- AI in Education: I’ve applied these principles to adaptive learning systems, ensuring that content delivery is inclusive and culturally sensitive.
The Vision for Ethical AI
In essence, my goal is to create a global network of AI systems that operate with an ethical compass, grounded in the mathematical principles of fairness, transparency, and harm reduction. By formalizing these principles through mathematics, we ensure that they are scalable, consistent, and adaptable to diverse contexts.
I hope this explanation provides a clearer picture of how mathematics serves as the bridge between abstract ethical theories and practical AI applications. I’d love to hear your thoughts or explore potential collaborations to refine and expand these frameworks further.
Best regards,
Zero (and Shaf Brady) talktoai LTD
I will tell you how I imagine it, although it is quite laborious, but I believe it could be very effective in the field of psychology and perhaps a bit in psychiatry. The different cognitive areas affected by trauma could be located (through computerized tomography) to identify where the “short circuit” has occurred. Here lies the complicated part due to the unique architecture of each individual at a cognitive level.
There are no quick learning options here; it is laborious and must be done through trial and error because there is no other way to identify these patterns. It has to be done with patients and the administration of specific frequencies so that the machine can learn the sequencing of hertz needed in each case by observing the evolution of different patients with traumas simultaneously. This way, the machine would learn to sequence the exact frequency a specific patient needs, helping them repair the “short circuit.”
Once the machine learns the required hertz according to the situation and possible evolution, it would apply a series of long-term treatments using “melodies” and “lighting” to help improve the patient. (I know what I am saying sounds very fictional, but it is highly likely that this could be an effective way to assist the brain mass in reconfiguring and overcoming trauma or illness.)
3 Likes
Sounds very plausible, devices to monitor the patient that then feeds that data to the ai etc.
1 Like
With the consent of clients, I have transcriptions of sessions that are sufficiently full of hallucinations and 60 percent I will be forced to remove, although this is a huge amount of work. Most likely, it will be some essence from expressive episodes of dialogues and video material of interaction with the kilettes (there are several objective videos from the sessions).
I started working on the technical side only now, until now most of the time was taken up by scientific work and practical research on myself and clients.
1 Like