I would like to suggest that OpenAI consider creating a separate, standalone community space — not just a subcategory — for users who work with OpenAI tools, especially ChatGPT, in non-developer roles.
Currently, there is no clear or well-structured place for people who use these tools extensively in their daily lives and work without engaging in coding or software development. That includes writers, educators, thinkers, concept creators, and many others who are seriously involved with AI, but not from a technical angle.
Because no such space exists, many of these users have started posting in the Developer Forum. Not because they’re confused — but because there’s simply nowhere else to go. The only alternative options seem to be fragmented social media spaces, which many thoughtful users intentionally avoid. I’m one of them.
The Developer Forum offers a clean, focused environment — which is exactly why people seek it out. But as more non-developers arrive, friction arises. Posts that fall outside development topics can disrupt ongoing conversations and trigger responses that aren’t constructive for anyone.
This isn’t about blame — it’s about fit. The Developer Forum does include a range of discussions, but its core focus is on development and technical work, which is entirely appropriate. However, there is now a clearly growing group of users working with AI in meaningful, serious ways that don’t fall into that category. That growth is visible — not speculative — and has become especially noticeable in the past few weeks.
I’m aware of the forum.openai.com/home space, but it doesn’t appear to host any public discussion either. If there’s already a designated place for non-developer users to engage in conversation with each other, I haven’t found it — and judging by recent activity, many others haven’t either.
A clearly defined, independent space would help everyone:
- Developer-focused discussions could stay streamlined
- Non-developers would have room to explore ideas relevant to their work
- And OpenAI would gain a better view of how its tools are used beyond technical contexts
Thanks for considering this. I believe it would be a meaningful addition to OpenAI’s community infrastructure.