Hi,
how would I need to setup the API parameters so that the replies are at the level of ChatGPT?
I have experienced a higher level of quality when using ChatGPT rather than the text-davinci-003. So I would like to use the API with ChatGPT quality.
Thank you!
And, BTW, amazing tool no one can say too much about it and its future impact…
1 Like
The difference between API GPT and chatGPT is that chatGPT has been further fine-tuned using human response based reinforced learning, making it’s text generator better. Currently, there is no way to mimic that using the API calls to GPT3. However, a possible chatGPT API is in the works as mentioned in one of the pinned topics in the forum. I am personally waiting for the chatGPT API as well.
2 Likes
Cannot wait. The output is so much more substantial.
1 Like
Welcome to the forum Nathalie !
If you haven’t seen it already, there is a waitlist where you can apply for ChatGPT API. Be sure to subscribe !
1 Like
All registered. 
Thanks for that tip @udm17 .
Does anyone know if there is an ETA for roll out yet?
From the above table we can see that the sample mean levels of PFOS of Australian water sources = 0.052 which is slightly less than the sample mean levels of PFOS in USA’s water sources = 0.059. But it is not sufficient to say that µ1 is significantly less than µ2. To draw this conclusion, we will move to the next step of the test. Where, µ1 =mean levels of PFOS in Australian water sources and µ2 = mean levels of PFOS in USA’s water sources. did u write this?