Im very excited for gpt4, i signed up with chatgpt+ and when i switch to the gpt4 model and ask it what it is it tells me its gpt3 and that gpt4 does not exist and it knows nothing past 2021
Hi, I was really hoping that GPT-4 would be compatible with the v1/completions endpoint (using text-davinci-003). I am not building a chat bot. Many other users are also not building chat bots, and there is much confusion in the community forum about this issue. Having to use v1/chat/completions and structure the inputs around 3 different roles, as if I was building a chat bot, in order to use OpenAI’s newest model, is frustrating. Can you give the community some insight as to whether GPT-4 will become available for use with the v1/completions endpoint any time soon? For people not building chat bots, the necessary changes to the code and parameters required for the v1/chat/completions endpoint take quite a bit of work and seem illogical. Obviously, we non-chat folks would much prefer not to have to make those changes. Thanks for you help.
Totally fair, I agree that it would be cool to have v1/completions, best thing to do would be to build around the existing chat completions and hopefully lean into the area where it can be more helpful to use the new format.
Hi. I was under the assumption that the new GPT-4 backed chatgpt+ would be capable of accessing links I give to it and using the information there as context.
However, I found this not to be true. For example:
Agree @mo0nman that the example they gave in the announcement is confusing. I’m guessing they pasted the whole thing in the prompt and chose to abbreviate it that way. Confusing nonetheless.
What it actually means is that it’s capable of handling larger text unlike GPT-3. So if you copy the body of text from Wikipedia, it summarizes it well.
Ah I see. Thank you for the clarification @curt.kennedy and @smuzani. The ambiguity in the announcement is unfortunate and will hopefully be made clearer in the future.
I figured I would be able to give it scientific articles to summarize since it said it allowed for use cases such as “document search and analysis”.