I would like to add a clear path to different monetization options besides the announced revenue sharing mechanism.
For example, hiding special knowledge behind a paywall in order to enable GPT supported consultations by a human expert.
Following the path of monetization there are so many options and it would be great to know what we can develop to recover development and upkeep costs.
One comment about âlow-effortâ GPTs: I personally believe that the market should take care off this. If my GPT was just a lazy prompt behind a soft paywall itâs very unlikely that large amounts of profits can be made and the storeâs mechanics to discover really helpful GPTs should accommodate this.
Looking forward to what the other members of the community have to say!
Hoping for some kind of general idea that helps me know what could cause any issues. Something that protects the users privacy but helps builders understand which part needs performance improvement
Yes, this is a great list. Did anyone else receive the survey they sent out? I asked a couple of those questions. Yea biggest thing for me is monetization. Will they simply pick the ones that are the most popular? And if so, how will they ensure itâs protected from other copy cat ones? Most of the ideas are very easily duplicated.
No, currently the store is only going to be available to subscription users.
My hope for the GPT store is for it to be minimalistic, with the ability to find other peopleâs GPTs, but not have them all showing on a few pages. I think having a search bar to find a specific one.
Edit: After seeing the GPT store all my hopes are verified.
I see GPTs being very useful on an individual basis/for personal projects or business purposes. Otherwise I donât see them being popular - much like the ChatGPT plugins failed. This is because you can do anything in a normal ChatGPT chat.
People could just make their own bread. but they donât. Or they donât know how. Or they canât be bothered. Or they could, but itâs easier to get someone else to do it. Or they prefer the better quality of others.
Soon AI will provide the full solution, but thereâs an interim period currently, where the solution is partly human, partly AI.
I hope that GPT developers are given a period of pre-release notification about exactly how the App Store will work before itâs released, so GPT developers can ramp up in the appropriate direction(s).
This is the reason I donât think the GPT Store will be the gold rush that some people think it will be. 20 bucks a month is a big barrier to widespread adoption.
Agreed. I paid $20 to create a GPT, but I would never pay anything, really, to play one. If the GPTs are not free, the GPT store will only be available, basically, to other GPT developers, which is not going to work well for anyone except OpenAI with what will amount to a âprofit-via-empoweringâ smokescreen.
I just donât see them making them free because if billions of people are running the GPT without paying 20 bucks a month who is eating that cost to run the GPT?
Donât think too much. No matter what youâre worried about The matter you want or things you are curious about You try exploring the website that is a marketplace for buying and selling prompts. That is a picture similar to what you would see in the official store. You canât be too quick to decide if itâs going to sell when you know it. Everyone knows differently. Other people donât know the same as us. Iâve been experimenting with creating prompts to get accepted for sales. Even though those images were originally recreated in just a few words, the elements of the images were always constant. But those methods cannot be sold. Making prompts into easy-to-use and stable templates Itâs not easy. And there is always someone ready to pay for it.
The biggest reason I believe that GPTâs are not going to be available for free users is the fact that GPTâs run GPT-4, Code Interpreter, DALL-E, and Web Browsing. These are all features only available to Plus users.
But, arenât tokens still a thing with the GPT store? And if so, how could it be free? Who would pay for the tokens used for each query? And, if people know itâs free, wouldnât that result in a LOT of tokens being expended?