Before there was AI in publish like GPT, humans were talking about the same old problems that had never been developed. There are no hypotheses to test the response. It’s not just about copyright. There are still many talented and intelligent people in the world, especially in the big news media. They know and understand that AI cases and data are in the public domain. It’s like a child picking up snacks that were left out. Being a thing that has thoughts by receiving it before knowing it, even if it has no intention, it must receive it. It is impossible for all to not understand that litigation is not the right solution.
Some of my comments and issues have been written here. We don’t use OpenAI, there’s nothing we can do about it.
Moreover, we must hold ourselves to a higher standard than the law. Letting it happen will be too late. Compared to past technologies, GPT has something that other technologies do not. We are more concerned with providing convenience than anything else. I call it “Words of curiosity” have answers, they have content, and they have no mind. Increasingly, wrongdoing decisions are being made in reference to the law. and regulations that are excessive Use in an unstable mental state (Emotional crisis) has the potential to be more severe than other factors in the past. Because some people are also addicted to AI, the characteristics of criminals classified by behavior have changed. Those who are prone to occasional misdeeds will easily develop into a higher category more quickly.
New restrictions are continually added. Yesterday I found out that GPT creates images as .webp files. I spent all night creating a batch of nearly 40 images * 2 and now I have only 10 words to convert to another usable file by GPT this time. Don’t continue using stupid denials but say that it depends on the system. If you want to use it, convert the file yourself.
Sorry for the late reply. It’s like my luck isn’t very good.