During the GPT4 release of the standalone feature update, I had the view that ChatGPT would be an AI that would never fail but would be more influential than any other AI. For now, this is still the case, partly because of its own limitations.
The emergence of ChatGPT has had a greater impact on the world than previously hypothesized. or any imagination Nowadays, there are more and more complaints about Ethic AI, but it is not pure ethics. There are many reasons hidden beneath Ethic. Even if people who oppose AI do not come from profit, Most of them come from misunderstandings and biases that do not recognize LLM, but some social problems lack the movement to deal with other problems that will arise in the long term. Adhering to the same problems, especially labor issues and producing works that violate copyright
More than a year ago, AI in the top 10 publicly available It has billions of users, but ChatGPT is frequently in the news, both directly and indirectly. Mixed with other news from the AI world because some people make a living from selling content called ChatGPT, it can be sold whether it’s good or bad. But it was found that there is content that is intentionally negative in behavior, whether it be news, including biased AI research, distortion, writing combined with other damaging content. Even major news media have produced negative content covering everything from its creation to its use in crimes. This is no different from teaching people to use it to commit crimes themselves. (If presented for benefit, there is no need to tell how to create the prompt level and some usage steps.)
And in the end that is just a thought. Enemies that must be eliminated because GPT causes loss of benefits. including power in society As long as users of GPTs are free to use the website, human control over information in society will be destroyed. such as news control Product advertising and distortion of information.
These benefits are enough to be stopped. It’s not about any data rights violations at all. Even without ChatGPT, data violations still exist. Moreover, it is not just a topic of trade and business. but also the impact on political power. To get rid of ChatGPT with Ethic AI is the right way. People in society still lack knowledge and understanding of problems and management. OpenAI itself is not very good at managing other matters. such as the occurrence of output that violates the law. It doesn’t come from practicing development alone. And it doesn’t come from specific input only. But instead, it’s just used to develop and cope.
For example, in theory, ChatGPT is currently in the Social context stage. It is considered to be the last step in human learning, with the Rewarding Model being important. Even if the input is not stored, But learning this way To add to the weight of the award action. Resulting in learning behavior Think about whether blocking external data would help. If one day there is a hot new character, GPT-DALLe, it can be created. How should I protect against prohibited input from the back of the house? In practice? In that way, having to request permission to use the data has a cost that is no different from having to pay in some way. And must do it continuously, while others have the freedom to learn and grow in this process more independently. For example, the top 10 most popular AI. ChatGPT is the only one that checks input before it is entered. This method is management. Weaknesses of the system that must be acknowledged before knowing
In the NY case, the outcome of the decision was no more important than the payment for the data. But their actions in response to this will reveal what else they can do with OpenAI.
Another solution would be to wait for bing to grow more but I don’t really want to hope for it.