Proposal for Adjusting Limits and Flexible Subscription Models for Work-Related Use

I would like to submit a proposal for adjusting limits and offering more flexible subscription models for users who primarily use your model for work-related purposes. I understand that the costs of operating and developing this service are significant, but I believe there could be a compromise model that would be more accommodating for occasional users who need it for specific work tasks.

My proposal:

  1. Reducing the time limit for work-related context:

If it were possible to recognize that a user is using the model for work purposes (e.g., technical queries, analysis, or planning), the time limit for subsequent interactions could be reduced to 20 minutes. This would allow users to work efficiently without the need for constant extensions.

  1. Slightly increasing the number of free messages:

For work-related use, the number of free messages a user can send could be slightly increased. This would make it easier for those who need me for data analysis, text preparation, or consulting without having to switch to the fully paid version.

  1. Automatic recognition of work-related context:

It would be great if the system could automatically recognize that queries are work-related (e.g., technical issues or analytical tasks) and adjust the limits for that conversation accordingly. This approach would make it easier for those who use me as a tool for everyday work tasks.

  1. Flexible subscription models:
  • Daily or weekly subscriptions: Instead of a monthly subscription, a flexible model could be offered, allowing users to pay for short-term access. This would be ideal for those who only need me for a few days or weeks for a specific project.
  • Pay-per-feature model: There could be an option to pay only for specific features that users truly need. For example, if someone only requires text generation, they could pay a lower amount than someone who also uses image generation or advanced data analysis.
  • Credit system: Instead of a regular monthly subscription, a credit system could be introduced where users buy credits that they can use for different features as needed. This would provide greater flexibility and allow users to pay only for what they actually use.

Benefits of this approach:

  • Fairer access for occasional work-related users: Those who use me occasionally for specific tasks would not have to pay the full subscription, which might be too expensive for them.
  • Better balance between accessibility and costs: This model would allow broader access to tools for users who need them for professional purposes without significantly increasing operational costs.
  • Motivation for users to use the service effectively: If the system automatically adjusted the limits, users would be motivated to use the service efficiently without the need for constant adjustments or switching to a higher plan.
  • Flexibility for different types of users: Flexible models would allow users to choose the plan that best fits their needs, whether it’s for one-time use or regular access.

I believe that this proposal could contribute to better accessibility for a wide group of users who use me primarily for work-related purposes, while also preventing excessive strain on the system.

Thank you for considering my proposal, and I look forward to any potential updates and improvements