Codex limits change is a serious mistake

You first gave generous limits, then doubled them for 2 months (Feb 2 → Apr 2). People built workflows and projects around that capacity.

Now you’re not just reverting — you’re cutting usage ~8x from what users were actively using.

This is not normalization. It’s a regression.

Impact:

  • breaks trust in platform stability

  • discourages building on Codex

  • signals that capabilities can be arbitrarily taken away

There is also no proper mid-tier ($50 / $100). The choice is: use far less or leave.

Many will leave.

This is not just about limits — it’s about trust.

Current pattern looks like: give a lot → create dependency → sharply restrict

That damages reputation and pushes users to alternatives.

If Codex is meant to be a serious dev platform:

  • limits must be predictable

  • pricing must match real usage tiers

  • changes must be gradual

Right now, this change does the opposite.

4 Likes

10 posts were merged into an existing topic: Codex Rate Limits Discussion Thread