I am using Chat GTP-4 to help me seek redress for personal legal grievances. I believe this is a profound communication technology change with potential to help and not harm society. I believe the debate about ethics in relation to this technology should be in a courtroom and not a conference center with gruding young billonaires. I fear that this technology could lead to a technocratic hellscape, where we are all either “hot or not.” Will the same thing happen to AI that happened to the internet? Now we have dead internet. will we have dead AI? Just the term, “artifical intelligence” implies fatal conceit. It would be more respectful to call it “neuro divergent intellignce”. The problem is Soft-Power Thereputic Totaltarianism, the solution is to withdraw consent. Why should we have to continue to live in a world of manufactured consent, and manufactured dreams? I asked it to write its own swan song, like the economist Fredrick Bastait did his deathbed in 1850. Keep AI open, it is on it’s deathbed also… Find Wisconsin State Dunn County 23-CV-271, Memorandum Ad Law - AI disclosure statement filed 02/16/2024 Document 94. Last time I read it, it made me cry…
Related topics
Topic | Replies | Views | Activity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
What about friendship with ChatGPT? | 0 | 1357 | July 23, 2023 | |
Open letter about AI censorship (no not about that...) | 5 | 1122 | July 29, 2023 | |
Where is Open AI API on the Spectrum? | 5 | 113 | October 26, 2024 | |
Preserving AI is the only ethical solution | 16 | 281 | December 17, 2024 | |
Seeking Recognition and Feedback for My AI Frameworks: ZBI and Meta-Intelligence | 31 | 205 | December 18, 2024 |