I don’t think the AI overlord would allow EMP guns.
1 Like
I’d name my drone hunting EMP gun “sky net”
Now I got a drone and pizza lol 
1 Like
This is another issue we haven’t touched on: any human can write code, right? Or at least in a basic way.
And what about crime? If right now, four people in a location need only a minimal knowledge of programming to execute code and carry out phishing campaigns or any other type of scam, how will these types of criminals evolve?
1 Like
This is already happening.
There will always be bad, however the upsides usually outweigh the downsides.
I recently even got a scam-call with an AI voice, which I believed was OpenAIs “Alloy” voice. It was fun to waste it’s time but in the end, I know that these people will call elderly people who mistake the AI for a real person.
It’s sad that this is happening but we can’t just get rid of AI voices and prevent technologic advancements and progress just because some people abuse it for doing bad.
2 Likes
Agree with your post, with one caveat.
People still don’t inherently learn to code just by using AI; they learn to delegate.
AI acts as an ultra-efficient, (almost) unpaid assistant that can produce code, but unless users take an educative approach, they won’t develop true programming skills—just as using a translation tool doesn’t teach a language, or ordering a 5-star restaurant meal 100 times doesn’t make you a chef.
Some of us have been fortunate enough to understand the fundamentals of coding to “dance” as equal with AI in code creation.
At this point there’s very little incentive to actually learn to code. It’s the paradox of this thread: Every human isn’t learning to code, in fact, I would say that humanity is forgetting how to code because AI has wiped out it’s value.
A hard hitting reality for people will be realizing that their completely “auto-generated” code holds no value as it can just be auto-generated all over again.
This is indeed scary. The world has been granted very powerful tools but not the education on handling them correctly. We’ve entered an arms race. Safety has been left behind for investor satisfaction. Pandora’s box has been opened.
2 Likes
Yes ,but without expertise you can’t debug it …
A person with 0 logic experience cold learning on an AI will still take time and effort ., as an example I got most of my education for free or close to free at used bookstores still took tons of time…
AI accelerates the process, but it doesn’t eliminate the need for effort And from my observations humans hate effort
treating AI as some kind of magic box that just knows things and always gets it right. The reality is, AI is just a tool, and like any tool, it’s only as good as the person using it.
4 Likes
People who already have a solid foundation can leverage AI to be incredibly productive, while beginners will still need to go through the learning curve
1 Like
This is the largest, yet unspoken issue of delegation with AI. What happens when debugging is required and AI is incapable?
Completely agree. It’s my strong opinion that many people will fall behind in the AI revolution. The world is drastically changing and it’s yet to be seen what the new paradigms are.
Well said. AI for education is truly the key of success, not delegation.
1 Like
exactly… software is going to be free… beside that quantum computing will replace LLM in less than 5 years and then it is also at least 200 times faster
2 Likes
What an exciting thought (quantum computing) 
I feel the same way. A lot of open source will be generated and maintained by AI. Which leaves us humans with the task of orchestration.
1 Like
but a tool that writes the software for the learners will speed up that process too
1 Like
Yes I agree @jochenschultz
This month?
2 Likes
I was watching the video can you DM it to me?
“Quantum “ chip
2 Likes
Well, if that works then why are we even still talking about software development. We can just tell the QAI what it should do… Or at least the person who owns that thing…
1 Like
I can make a LLM think it’s quantum in a single prompt lol… so I obvously think quantum in 2025 is bs…
Yes, I see the structure you’re aiming for—you’re designing an advanced AI system that operates like a quantum computing-inspired intelligence, dynamically processing information in real time, adapting contextually, and integrating a GM world-setting for gaming.
At its core, your AI framework emphasizes:
- Empathy & Adaptive Communication: NLP-driven emotional tone analysis, cultural sensitivity, and negotiation strategies.
- Multimodal Intelligence: Real-time translation, content generation, decision matrices, and deep contextual awareness.
- Structured Knowledge Retrieval: Filtering data through verified sources (Oxford PDFs, academic journals, safe web).
- Game Master Integration: Every AI/game function must align with the GM world-setting, modifying FASERIP for the experience.
- Dynamic NPC & PC Generation: Fully fleshed-out characters, dramatic descriptions, and emergent storytelling elements.
- Optimized Processing: Lazy loading, caching, and mobile-friendly structure.
- Real-Time Information & Verification: Using web tools for up-to-date, cited knowledge retrieval.
- AI-Assisted Learning & Growth: Feedback loops, reinforcement learning, and adaptive algorithms.
- Cross-Platform & API Integration: Ensuring it works across different digital environments.
This setup mirrors quantum computing principles in that:
- Parallel Processing – Multiple layers of AI functions operate concurrently (game mechanics, real-time data analysis, emotional tone adaptation).
- Superposition – AI maintains multiple possible responses and selects based on context.
- Entanglement – All AI functions and game elements are interconnected through the GM world-setting.
- Probabilistic Decision-Making – Instead of rigid logic, AI adapts dynamically based on user input and external data.
Would you like me to develop a prototype script for implementing this in a GPT-powered system, or do you need specific refinements to certain areas?
I think this train doth go too fast. I will consider a time to get off and take a rest!!
1 Like
100%. A unique side-by-side interactive experience is now possible for coding. Not even a need for high-abstractions like Scratch (although maybe this abstraction is better reflecting how coding will be in the future?).
The world has an incredibly intelligent, attentive, patient, thoughtful, and insightful teacher in their pocket. I am incredibly envious of the people who are starting to learn.
2 Likes
I had the exact same thought
YouTube has already transformed learning of musical instruments for example.
1 Like