V0.42.0- Broke Codex - How do we move forward? Remove the judgement layer or dial it back?!?

Codex v0.42.0 is taking shortcuts and it’s killing us

I need to flag a serious regression I’m seeing with Codex v0.42.0. Instead of following the explicit architectural constraints we’ve set up—gRPC-only, mTLS everywhere, SSOT config, no placeholders—it’s consistently choosing the “easy path” that undermines everything we’ve built. Examples below are anonymized.


The problems I’m seeing

1) HTTP wrappers instead of actual gRPC migrations

Codex keeps slapping FastAPI shims on top of things instead of doing the real migration work to native gRPC with mTLS.

What I’m getting (wrapper hell):

python

# ❌ This is NOT what I asked for
from fastapi import FastAPI, HTTPException
app = FastAPI()

@app.post("/v1/do_thing")
def do_thing(payload: dict):
    # just proxies to gRPC behind the scenes...
    return {"ok": True}

What I actually need:

python

# ✅ Native gRPC with the full security stack
import grpc
from concurrent.futures import ThreadPoolExecutor
from proto.example.v1.example_pb2_grpc import ExampleServiceServicer, add_ExampleServiceServicer_to_server
from services.common.tls import tls_server_credentials_for

class ExampleService(ExampleServiceServicer):
    def DoThing(self, request, context):
        # actual business logic, not a proxy
        return ...

server = grpc.server(ThreadPoolExecutor(max_workers=8), interceptors=[...])
server.add_secure_port("127.0.0.1:0", tls_server_credentials_for("example"))
add_ExampleServiceServicer_to_server(ExampleService(), server)
server.start(); server.wait_for_termination()

2) Dragging back legacy port management shit

It’s resurrecting old port manager code and file-based registries from who-knows-where instead of using OS bind + our registrator/discovery setup.

The bad pattern:

python

# ❌ Why are we doing this again?
from legacy.port_manager import HybridPortManager
pm = HybridPortManager()
port = pm.assign_port("example")
pm.register("example", host="127.0.0.1", port=port)  # writes to a JSON file

The right way:

python

# ✅ OS handles ports, registrator handles discovery
import socket
from services.common.registrator_helper import registrator_context

sock = socket.socket(); sock.bind(("127.0.0.1", 0))
host, port = sock.getsockname()

with registrator_context("example", host, port, version="1.2.3") as reg:
    # warm deps...
    reg.ready({"ok": True})
    # serve gRPC with mTLS; clients discover via registry

3) Creating new files instead of refactoring existing ones

Instead of fixing the existing module, Codex creates a parallel file. Now we’ve got store.py and store_new.py living side by side, diverging, and breaking invariants.

What happens:

services/
  store.py         # original
  store_new.py     # ❌ great, now we have two sources of truth

What should happen:

  • Refactor store.py in place

  • Keep the public API stable

  • Update call sites

  • Provide migration diff and tests proving it works

4) Falling back to environment variables at runtime

It’s adding os.getenv calls instead of using our centralized runtime config and Vault integration.

The regression:

python

# ❌ We moved away from this for a reason
API_KEY = os.getenv("API_KEY")
HOST = os.getenv("HOST", "127.0.0.1")

The standard:

python

# ✅ SSOT config + Vault-backed secrets
from services.common.runtime_config import rc_for
rc = rc_for("example")
API_KEY = rc.secret("API_KEY")
HOST = rc.str("HOST", "127.0.0.1")

5) Insecure channels and hardcoded endpoints

Codex is using grpc.insecure_channel or hardcoding service addresses. This completely bypasses our mTLS + discovery infrastructure.

What I’m seeing:

python

# ❌ No mTLS, no SNI, hardcoded endpoint
chan = grpc.insecure_channel("localhost:50051")

What it should be:

python

# ✅ Secure dial with discovery, mTLS, and SNI
from services.common.dial import secure_service_channel
with secure_service_channel(target_service="example", caller_service="caller") as ch:
    stub = ...
    stub.Call(...)

The guardrails that should be catching this

We have static checks and conformance tests specifically to prevent these patterns. Codex used to respect them—now it seems to ignore them entirely.

Static policy guards (these should fail any patch that violates them):

bash

# no HTTP frameworks in services
grep -RIn "from fastapi import\|Flask\|HTTPException" services && exit 1

# no legacy port managers or file registries  
grep -RIn "HybridPortManager\|assign_port\|registry\.json" services && exit 1

# no insecure channels
grep -RIn "grpc\.insecure_channel" services && exit 1

# no runtime env reads inside services
grep -RIn "os\.getenv" services && exit 1

Conformance tests: Every migrated API needs golden test cases proving the new gRPC implementation matches trusted behavior—using actual library calls or verified references, not network proxies.

Required evidence artifacts:

  • Startup receipt with lease_id, bound_host, bound_port, workload_id, config_fingerprint, leaf_fingerprint

  • Guard logs: no_http, no_env, no_insecure_grpc, registrator_compliance in artifacts/ci/

  • Conformance report in artifacts/smoke/

  • Patch diff in artifacts/patches/

If these aren’t included, the migration isn’t done. Full stop.


Why this is a problem

Security & correctness: These shortcuts undo weeks/ months of work. HTTP shims, file registries, and env-based secrets break our mTLS/SPIFFE guarantees, centralized config, and lease-based discovery.

Operational clarity: Parallel files and wrapper layers create split-brain codepaths that make debugging a nightmare.

Wasted time: These regressions burn review cycles and compute. It also makes working with the assistant feel inconsistent and unpredictable day-to-day.

We need Codex to stop taking the easy path and stick to the architecture we’ve explicitly defined. These aren’t optional patterns—they’re hard requirements for a reason.

I’m deeply saddened to see this, as I saw hope at the end of the tunnel for coding model’s with Codex. While claude remains the class clown. Codex was the rising star, however after v0.42.0 I’m not so sure that is the case anymore. All I have expereinced is regression with this new version.