I created a thread with the 1st user query. That is working as expected. But when i ask a follow up question in the same thread, the data is not picked properly. The logs attached below:
2026-07-04 18:54:32,892 - INFO - [TRACE] assistant_index=6 → user_query_text=‘Can you find supporting judgements where delay has been condoned in cheque bounce case.’
2026-07-04 18:54:32,892 - INFO - [USER idx=9] blocks=[‘Give me more details about Hiren Ashwin Shah Vs State of Maharashtra’]
2026-07-04 18:54:32,892 - INFO - [USER idx=13] blocks=[‘[[DRILLDOWN_INSTRUCTIONS]]\n{“type”: “drilldown_request”, “source”: “fullsummary”, “summary_id”: “27023_2018_Judgement_08-May-2019”, “case_reference”: null, “section_focus”: “all”, “question”: “Give me more details about Hiren Ashwin Shah Vs State of Maharashtra”}’]
2026-07-04 18:54:32,892 - INFO - [USER idx=16] blocks=[‘Show me any judgements where delay in issue of demand notice condoned in cheque bounce case.’]
2026-07-04 18:54:32,894 - INFO - [USER idx=17] blocks=['{“query_context”: {“user_query_text”: “Show me any judgements where delay in issue of demand notice condoned in cheque bounce case.”, “parsed”: {“broad_legal_issue”: “Cheque Dishonor”, “specific_legal_issue”: “Condonation of delay in issuing demand notice in cheque bounce case”, “target_outcome”: “Condonation of delay in issuing demand notice”, “party_roles_and_relationship”: {“represented_party_type”: “initiating party”, “legal_role”: “complainant”}, “legal_provisions”: [“Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act”], “assumptions”: “Assumed that the query is from the perspective of the complainant seeking condonation for delay.”, “ambiguity”: “none”}}
Why is this happening? Even when the threadid is the same why am i not able to access the data that was previously created and stored in it?
FYI.. Am using assistants API with gpt-4o-mini.