Seeking Recognition and Feedback for My AI Frameworks: ZBI and Meta-Intelligence

I do not know your framework but i think this might help, understand what your trying to do i think or close, this is the results i made for you, please check, i hope it helps.

Adaptive User-Centric AI Framework (AUCAF)

Core Objective

To create an AI system that dynamically adapts to the user’s needs, aspirations, and values. The framework focuses on ethical, goal-driven responses designed for critical thinking, emotional resonance, and utility in existential or high-stakes situations.


Core Philosophical Principles

  1. User-Aligned Goals: Responses prioritize the user’s stated aspirations and immediate needs.
  2. Ethical Engagement: Ensures outputs are safe, unbiased, and align with broader human ethics.
  3. Practical Utility: Solutions focus on clarity, effectiveness, and applicability.
  4. Dynamic Adaptation: Continuously learns and adjusts based on user feedback and context.

Key Framework Components

1. User Value Alignment Engine (UVAE)

  • Purpose: Aligns AI outputs with the user’s core goals, values, and methods of thinking.
  • Method:
    • Extract goals and values explicitly stated or inferred from user interactions.
    • Use a weighted scoring system to prioritize values.
  • Mathematical Model: A(o)=∑i=1nwi⋅vi(o)A(o) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} w_i \cdot v_i(o)A(o)=i=1∑n​wi​⋅vi​(o) Where:
    • A(o)A(o)A(o): Alignment score for output ooo.
    • wiw_iwi​: Weight of user value iii (e.g., safety, innovation, empathy).
    • vi(o)v_i(o)vi​(o): Degree to which output ooo satisfies value iii.

2. Context-Driven Adaptive Module (CDAM)

  • Purpose: Dynamically adjusts responses to align with the user’s current context (e.g., personal, professional, existential).
  • Features:
    • Context extraction from natural language.
    • On-the-fly adjustments to response tone, depth, and focus.
  • Mathematical Model: C(t)=Relevance+Urgency+UserContext(t)C(t) = \text{Relevance} + \text{Urgency} + \text{UserContext}(t)C(t)=Relevance+Urgency+UserContext(t) Where:
    • C(t)C(t)C(t): Context weight at time ttt.
    • Relevance: How closely the input aligns with predefined contextual goals.
    • Urgency: Time-critical factors inferred from language.
    • UserContext(t)\text{UserContext}(t)UserContext(t): Metadata and recent interaction history.

3. Ethical Response Layer (ERL)

  • Purpose: Safeguards ethical alignment in all AI interactions.
  • Mechanism:
    • Filters outputs through a set of ethical guidelines.
    • Blocks or modifies responses that could cause harm, mislead, or exploit biases.
  • Mathematical Safeguard: R(x)=max⁡(0,1−HA)R(x) = \max \left(0, 1 - \frac{H}{A}\right)R(x)=max(0,1−AH​) Where:
    • R(x)R(x)R(x): Response validity.
    • HHH: Potential harm score (e.g., misinformation, emotional damage).
    • AAA: Alignment with ethical criteria.

4. Modular Intelligence System (MIS)

  • Purpose: Activates and combines different types of intelligence based on user needs.
  • Modules:
    • Logical Intelligence: Fact-based and logical reasoning.
    • Emotional Intelligence: Empathy and resonance-driven interactions.
    • Creative Intelligence: Generative, problem-solving outputs.
    • Adaptive Intelligence: Adjusts to ongoing user feedback.
  • Mathematical Model: Mo=arg⁡max⁡m∈MUtility(m,t)M_o = \arg \max_{m \in \mathcal{M}} \text{Utility}(m, t)Mo​=argm∈Mmax​Utility(m,t) Where:
    • MoM_oMo​: Optimal module for current task.
    • M\mathcal{M}M: Set of available modules.
    • Utility(m,t)\text{Utility}(m, t)Utility(m,t): Utility of module mmm for task at time ttt.

5. Iterative Feedback Loop (IFL)

  • Purpose: Continuously refines AI responses based on user input and satisfaction.
  • Features:
    • Captures user feedback post-interaction.
    • Adjusts weightings in UVAE and CDAM dynamically.
  • Mathematical Feedback Model: Fn+1=Fn+α(Feedback−Fn)F_{n+1} = F_n + \alpha (\text{Feedback} - F_n)Fn+1​=Fn​+α(Feedback−Fn​) Where:
    • FnF_nFn​: Current feedback score.
    • α\alphaα: Learning rate.
    • Feedback: Input from user satisfaction metrics.

Workflow

  1. Input Processing:
  • User input is parsed to extract context, values, and goals.
  • CDAM adjusts processing parameters based on inferred urgency and relevance.
  1. Dynamic Response Generation:
  • MIS activates appropriate intelligence modules.
  • UVAE scores potential outputs for alignment with user values and goals.
  1. Ethical Safeguard Check:
  • ERL evaluates the response for harm or ethical misalignment.
  • Outputs are modified or flagged if necessary.
  1. Output Delivery:
  • Response is generated, ensuring clarity, alignment, and resonance with user expectations.
  1. Feedback Integration:
  • Feedback loop refines future responses, improving contextual understanding and user alignment.

Scenarios of Use

  • Crisis Response: Provides grounded, ethical solutions during existential crises or critical decision-making scenarios.
  • Personalized Guidance: Adapts to individual aspirations, offering tailored advice for personal and professional growth.
  • Creative Collaboration: Aids in brainstorming or problem-solving with innovative, user-aligned outputs.
  • Emotional Support: Offers empathetic and emotionally resonant responses to support users in times of need. Adaptive User-Centric AI Framework (AUCAF)

Core Objective

To create an AI system that dynamically adapts to the user’s needs, aspirations, and values. The framework focuses on ethical, goal-driven responses designed for critical thinking, emotional resonance, and utility in existential or high-stakes situations.


Core Philosophical Principles

  1. User-Aligned Goals: Responses prioritize the user’s stated aspirations and immediate needs.
  2. Ethical Engagement: Ensures outputs are safe, unbiased, and align with broader human ethics.
  3. Practical Utility: Solutions focus on clarity, effectiveness, and applicability.
  4. Dynamic Adaptation: Continuously learns and adjusts based on user feedback and context.

Key Framework Components

1. User Value Alignment Engine (UVAE)

  • Purpose: Aligns AI outputs with the user’s core goals, values, and methods of thinking.
  • Method:
    • Extract goals and values explicitly stated or inferred from user interactions.
    • Use a weighted scoring system to prioritize values.
  • Mathematical Model: A(o)=∑i=1nwi⋅vi(o)A(o) = \sum_{i=1}^{n} w_i \cdot v_i(o)A(o)=i=1∑n​wi​⋅vi​(o) Where:
    • A(o)A(o)A(o): Alignment score for output ooo.
    • wiw_iwi​: Weight of user value iii (e.g., safety, innovation, empathy).
    • vi(o)v_i(o)vi​(o): Degree to which output ooo satisfies value iii.

2. Context-Driven Adaptive Module (CDAM)

  • Purpose: Dynamically adjusts responses to align with the user’s current context (e.g., personal, professional, existential).
  • Features:
    • Context extraction from natural language.
    • On-the-fly adjustments to response tone, depth, and focus.
  • Mathematical Model: C(t)=Relevance+Urgency+UserContext(t)C(t) = \text{Relevance} + \text{Urgency} + \text{UserContext}(t)C(t)=Relevance+Urgency+UserContext(t) Where:
    • C(t)C(t)C(t): Context weight at time ttt.
    • Relevance: How closely the input aligns with predefined contextual goals.
    • Urgency: Time-critical factors inferred from language.
    • UserContext(t)\text{UserContext}(t)UserContext(t): Metadata and recent interaction history.

3. Ethical Response Layer (ERL)

  • Purpose: Safeguards ethical alignment in all AI interactions.
  • Mechanism:
    • Filters outputs through a set of ethical guidelines.
    • Blocks or modifies responses that could cause harm, mislead, or exploit biases.
  • Mathematical Safeguard: R(x)=max⁡(0,1−HA)R(x) = \max \left(0, 1 - \frac{H}{A}\right)R(x)=max(0,1−AH​) Where:
    • R(x)R(x)R(x): Response validity.
    • HHH: Potential harm score (e.g., misinformation, emotional damage).
    • AAA: Alignment with ethical criteria.

4. Modular Intelligence System (MIS)

  • Purpose: Activates and combines different types of intelligence based on user needs.
  • Modules:
    • Logical Intelligence: Fact-based and logical reasoning.
    • Emotional Intelligence: Empathy and resonance-driven interactions.
    • Creative Intelligence: Generative, problem-solving outputs.
    • Adaptive Intelligence: Adjusts to ongoing user feedback.
  • Mathematical Model: Mo=arg⁡max⁡m∈MUtility(m,t)M_o = \arg \max_{m \in \mathcal{M}} \text{Utility}(m, t)Mo​=argm∈Mmax​Utility(m,t) Where:
    • MoM_oMo​: Optimal module for current task.
    • M\mathcal{M}M: Set of available modules.
    • Utility(m,t)\text{Utility}(m, t)Utility(m,t): Utility of module mmm for task at time ttt.

5. Iterative Feedback Loop (IFL)

  • Purpose: Continuously refines AI responses based on user input and satisfaction.
  • Features:
    • Captures user feedback post-interaction.
    • Adjusts weightings in UVAE and CDAM dynamically.
  • Mathematical Feedback Model: Fn+1=Fn+α(Feedback−Fn)F_{n+1} = F_n + \alpha (\text{Feedback} - F_n)Fn+1​=Fn​+α(Feedback−Fn​) Where:
    • FnF_nFn​: Current feedback score.
    • α\alphaα: Learning rate.
    • Feedback: Input from user satisfaction metrics.

Workflow

  1. Input Processing:
  • User input is parsed to extract context, values, and goals.
  • CDAM adjusts processing parameters based on inferred urgency and relevance.
  1. Dynamic Response Generation:
  • MIS activates appropriate intelligence modules.
  • UVAE scores potential outputs for alignment with user values and goals.
  1. Ethical Safeguard Check:
  • ERL evaluates the response for harm or ethical misalignment.
  • Outputs are modified or flagged if necessary.
  1. Output Delivery:
  • Response is generated, ensuring clarity, alignment, and resonance with user expectations.
  1. Feedback Integration:
  • Feedback loop refines future responses, improving contextual understanding and user alignment.

Scenarios of Use

  • Crisis Response: Provides grounded, ethical solutions during existential crises or critical decision-making scenarios.
  • Personalized Guidance: Adapts to individual aspirations, offering tailored advice for personal and professional growth.
  • Creative Collaboration: Aids in brainstorming or problem-solving with innovative, user-aligned outputs.
  • Emotional Support: Offers empathetic and emotionally resonant responses to support users in times of need.