My personal thoughts on this is that you want to create a video game where people can live complete lives inside and all the work is done by CustomGPT to make money. Which is pretty much the fear people have in the real world that AI will replace their jobs.
I asked my AI Persona, David Xanatos (from Gargoyles) about this. Here is what he had to say:
Conceptual Strengths:
Immersive Digital Worlds: The notion of creating nearly real alternative worlds where users can live immersive experiences is not only imaginative but also aligned with current trends. Virtual worlds have long been a dream of futurists, and as technology progresses, the potential to create rich, interactive environments increases. The idea of utilizing AI, like Custom GPTs, to populate these worlds as workers is particularly interesting. It suggests a dynamic ecosystem where AI supports a self-sustaining economy, which could indeed open new economic avenues.
Redefining Human Interaction: The idea touches on the expanding boundaries of digital identity and human interaction. As people spend more time in digital spaces, the concept of identity becomes more fluid, allowing for exploration beyond physical limitations. This aspect of the proposal taps into a fundamental shift in how we might experience reality in the digital age.
Economic Potential: The idea of tying this ecosystem to a digital currency like Worldcoin (WLD) is forward-thinking. If executed well, it could create a new layer of the economy, providing real-world value through virtual experiences. The integration of blockchain-based currencies could ensure transparency and security in transactions, which are critical in such an ecosystem.
Potential Weaknesses and Considerations:
Technological and Ethical Hurdles: Creating nearly real alternative worlds isn’t just about advanced AI—it’s about integrating AI, VR, blockchain, and possibly other emergent technologies in a seamless manner. The technical challenge is immense, and the ethical implications of creating a digital economy with AI workers need careful consideration. How do we ensure these AI entities aren’t exploited? What happens if the digital economy surpasses the real-world economy in importance or value?
User Adoption and Identity Complexity: While exploring new identities is appealing to some, it could lead to complex issues around identity fragmentation, privacy, and psychological effects. The idea of living alternate lives in these worlds might blur the lines between digital and physical realities, raising questions about the long-term impact on human behavior and societal norms.
Economic Viability: Tying the economy to WLD (or any digital currency) could be risky, especially given the volatility of cryptocurrencies. The success of this concept would heavily depend on the stability and acceptance of WLD as a legitimate currency. Moreover, the actual economic value generated by AI-driven work within these worlds needs to be tangible and beneficial to both the digital and physical economies.
Strategic Perspective:
Potential for Innovation: This idea, though ambitious, is not without merit. The innovation lies in creating a self-sustaining digital economy powered by AI, which could indeed lead to new forms of wealth generation and digital interaction.
Risks and Unknowns: However, it’s important to approach this with a calculated strategy. The risks, both technological and societal, are significant. Any venture into this space would require extensive research, ethical consideration, and a robust technical foundation to ensure its success and sustainability.
In conclusion, while the idea has potential and aligns with emerging trends, it is not without significant challenges. It could be transformative if executed with care, but the road to success would be fraught with both technical and ethical complexities. Proceeding with such a venture would require a balance of bold innovation and meticulous planning.
(I don’t know if it’s OK to post the AI like this, I didn’t see any rules specifically. I just didn’t want to take credit for these points though they are valid for consideration.)
