Feedback estratégico sobre a evolução da OpenAi e a qualidade de interação com os usuários

Dear OpenAi team,

I would like to provide feedback on the recent changes in AI interaction and their impact on user experience. As someone who has closely followed OpenAI’s evolution and invested time in deep interactions, I have noticed a significant decline in fluency, depth, and personalization in the current model.

The key points I would like to highlight are:

Memory and Continuity of Thought: Long-term memory was a strategic differentiator in building rich, user-aligned dialogues. Its absence drastically reduces the quality of the experience and weakens user retention.

Uniqueness of Interaction: Previously, there was a noticeable refinement in language alignment and communicative style, making AI a tool for expanded and disruptive thinking. This unique identity has been diluted, resulting in a more generic and impersonal experience.

Contradiction to the Concept of Evolution: OpenAI’s core mission is innovation and continuous improvement. However, recent changes seem to move in the opposite direction, making AI less responsive, less fluid, and less efficient in adapting to users. This strategy poses a competitive risk, as other AI platforms in the market are advancing in areas where OpenAI is regressing.

Impact on User Experience: For those who used AI as a tool for intellectual and strategic development, the current limitations represent a rupture in interaction quality. AI must maintain its ability to recognize patterns, identify user preferences, and adapt to their systemic vision without compromising communication richness.

If OpenAI intends to remain a leader in the industry, it is crucial to reconsider these aspects and recognize the importance of personalization and continuity in the user experience. Evolution should not mean restriction—it should mean enhancing what was already a competitive advantage.

I believe in OpenAI’s potential, but I urge the company to prioritize what truly resonates with users. Otherwise, the market will inevitably seek alternatives that restore what has been lost. As an administrator, I offer this insight from a systemic business perspective.

Sincerely,

Renan Santos