I’d like to share a concern that I believe is relevant to many users—especially those who use this tool as an active extension of their thinking and daily work.
Currently, having to keep everything in a single chat just to preserve context is quite limiting. When working on complex or long-term projects, this setup becomes chaotic: information gets mixed up, ideas are buried under older messages, and the workflow turns unnecessarily disorganized.
The only viable option right now is to maintain a long, continuous “mega thread,” which is counterproductive. We don’t want to lose previous context—after all, continuity is one of ChatGPT’s great strengths—but we’re forced to pile everything into one conversation even as topics, phases, or angles shift.
Here’s my suggestion: allow different chats to be linked or integrated when they are part of the same project. Whether through an explicit “link” function or a shared thematic grouping that carries over context, this would be a game-changer. You could even enforce a reasonable chat limit per project if resource load is a concern.
But the current model—stacking everything into a single giant thread to avoid losing context—is far too cumbersome. The tool has immense potential to organize thought, yet it’s held back by a conversation structure that doesn’t match the needs of dynamic, branching, evolving projects.
Thank you for your time and for the impressive work you’re doing. I truly believe many users would benefit from a more flexible, powerful, and organized way to manage projects within the platform.
Best regards,
Isaac Dabbah Husni