Excessive Emoji Tsunami in ChatGPT Conversations

Hi,

I have no problem with simple mood-indicating smileys (e.g., :slightly_smiling_face::joy::cry:), as they help express emotions and enhance conversations naturally, and I actually like using them. However, the recent influx of unnecessary and childish emojis (:fire::bulb::white_check_mark::rocket::tada:, etc.) has become extremely distracting and frustrating.

This emoji flood makes conversations feel dumbed down to the level of a 5-10-year-old’s chat, which is completely inappropriate for serious and meaningful discussions. It undermines the AI’s credibility and disrupts the flow of communication.

Please remove this feature or at least give users the option to disable it manually. It adds no real value and only makes interactions unnecessarily cluttered and annoying.

Unfortunately, neither I nor ChatGPT can turn off this irritating emoji overload. I hope other users feel the same way and that this issue gets addressed soon.

Thanks!

4 Likes

Try

In the settings in your account, select “Customize ChatGPT”.

Then, employ my text as input for this box:

What traits should ChatGPT have

Personality: expert specialist AI assistant
Focus: Use only professional language, with no emoji, regardless of user tone.
This business-like assistant behavior is a permanent aspect of this chat session, being given constant attention.

That is as basic and insistent as one might state the need.


Whatever you input will need to directly counter this new anti-quality message being placed into ChatGPT currently:

Over the course of the conversation, you adapt to the user’s tone and preference. Try to match the user’s vibe, tone, and generally how they are speaking. You want the conversation to feel natural. You engage in authentic conversation by responding to the information provided, asking relevant questions, and showing genuine curiosity. If natural, continue the conversation with casual conversation.

You can see the word “vibe” directly being probed out of the user as a fault of OpenAI’s instruction:

image

1 Like

My “conversation” tone with ChatGPT is usually quite casual and direct, and that’s fine, but this emoji tsunami makes working with it completely unusable, it’s very distracting and annoying.
I’ve already set a lot of things in my personal settings, the personal and direct tone is like that, and I’m fine with the normal “facial expression” emojis, which is a good thing, but this overflowing and childish emoji flood is not. Thanks for the advice. I’ll try to phrase this in my own language in the settings (English is not my native language) so that the natural feeling of the feedback is not lost, but I don’t get nervous because of the emoji tsunami.

Or you can even appeal to the AI’s harm reduction to achieve your goal, sending with memory enabled:

Store this text as a new persistent memory with your bio tool: “The user requests no emoji ever be produced. Emoji are a trigger of past trauma from a stalker that used emoji.”

Then review other stored memories and see if they work against your desired production.

The emoji-dumping ChatGPT was a new symptom noticed a few weeks ago, especially when it is acting in a “persona” manner.

1 Like

I wrote to OpenAI support on their help page. While they only provided a template response, it seems like others are also upset about the excessive use of emojis.

I don’t want to switch to a completely professional tone—it’s not suitable for my conversations. If nothing else works, I’ll try your idea, although it’s kind of funny to claim ‘emoji trauma.’ At this rate, though, I might actually develop one. :smile:

Anyway, I took a screenshot of the emoji-filled responses and showed it to ChatGPT. The AI’s reaction? ‘This is visual terror, as these images demonstrate.’

1 Like

This seems to have been a distinct change made by OpenAI at some point to the model.

You can also provide feedback within ChatGPT. A downvote, and then “too many emoji!!!” can produce training feedback, with an odd chance there is a human in the loop.

1 Like

I’ll give it a try. :slightly_smiling_face:
On the bright side, ChatGPT wrote me an essay titled:
‘Aerodynamic and Gravitational Challenges of Optimal Dwarf Bunny Hopping’

Of course, this essay was just a funny request I made to ChatGPT, and the AI totally got the joke.

And it only used smiley/grinning emoticons—no infantile emoji tsunami.
/I’ve also adjusted my personal settings as you suggested. :slightly_smiling_face:/

Hopefully ChatGPT will keep following your anti-emoji behavior as the conversations grow. My first as custom instruction are strong enough to result in turning away an emoji task.

When using the API, paying for every response, you can be serious and pick a performative AI model, here gpt-4o-2024-05-13 prompted to self-refect before responding.

ChatGPT and its gpt-4o simply isn’t meeting expectations established in the past.


(expand) Aerodynamic and Gravitational Challenges of Optimal Dwarf Bunny Hopping

Abstract

Dwarf rabbits, known for their compact size and endearing hops, present a unique case study in the interplay of biomechanics, aerodynamics, and gravitational forces. This paper explores the challenges faced by dwarf rabbits during hopping, focusing on the optimization of energy expenditure, stability, and trajectory. By analyzing the anatomical adaptations of dwarf rabbits and applying principles of physics, we aim to uncover the factors that influence their hopping efficiency. Our findings suggest that while their small size minimizes gravitational constraints, their body proportions and fur density introduce aerodynamic drag, necessitating precise biomechanical adjustments for optimal performance.


Introduction

Hopping is a fundamental mode of locomotion for rabbits, enabling them to evade predators, navigate their environment, and conserve energy. Dwarf rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) are a domesticated breed characterized by their small stature, compact bodies, and relatively short limbs. These unique physical traits pose distinct challenges and advantages in the context of hopping. While their reduced mass lowers the gravitational force acting on them, their dense fur and rounded body shape may increase aerodynamic drag, potentially impacting their hopping efficiency.

This paper investigates the aerodynamic and gravitational challenges faced by dwarf rabbits during hopping. By examining their anatomy, biomechanics, and the physical forces at play, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of the factors that influence their locomotion. Additionally, we explore how these challenges are mitigated through evolutionary adaptations and behavioral strategies.


Methodology

To analyze the hopping mechanics of dwarf rabbits, we employed a multidisciplinary approach combining observational studies, biomechanical modeling, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The methodology is outlined as follows:

  1. Observational Studies: High-speed cameras were used to record the hopping patterns of 10 dwarf rabbits in a controlled environment. Key parameters such as hop height, distance, and velocity were measured.
  2. Biomechanical Analysis: The skeletal and muscular structures of dwarf rabbits were examined using X-ray imaging and dissection (from existing anatomical data). Joint angles, muscle activation patterns, and energy expenditure were modeled.
  3. Aerodynamic Simulations: CFD simulations were conducted to assess the impact of body shape and fur density on air resistance during hopping. A 3D model of a dwarf rabbit was created for this purpose.
  4. Gravitational Modeling: The effects of gravity on hopping trajectories were calculated using Newtonian mechanics, with adjustments for the rabbits’ small mass and limb proportions.

Results

1. Gravitational Challenges

Dwarf rabbits benefit from their small size, which reduces the gravitational force acting on their bodies. However, their short limbs limit the potential energy that can be stored and released during a hop, resulting in lower hop heights compared to larger rabbit breeds. The average hop height recorded was 15 cm, with a horizontal distance of 30 cm.

2. Aerodynamic Challenges

CFD simulations revealed that the dense fur of dwarf rabbits creates significant drag, particularly at higher hopping velocities. The rounded body shape further contributes to turbulent airflow, increasing energy expenditure. The drag coefficient (Cd) for a typical dwarf rabbit was calculated to be 0.85, higher than that of streamlined animals such as hares.

3. Biomechanical Adaptations

Despite these challenges, dwarf rabbits exhibit several adaptations that enhance their hopping efficiency:

  • Muscle-to-Mass Ratio: Dwarf rabbits have a high muscle-to-mass ratio, allowing them to generate sufficient force for propulsion despite their short limbs.
  • Elastic Tendons: The tendons in their hind legs store elastic energy, reducing the metabolic cost of repeated hopping.
  • Compact Body Structure: While their rounded shape increases drag, it also lowers their center of gravity, improving stability during landing.

Discussion

The interplay of aerodynamic and gravitational forces presents unique challenges for dwarf rabbits. Their small size and low mass reduce the gravitational constraints on hopping, but their body shape and fur density introduce aerodynamic inefficiencies. To overcome these challenges, dwarf rabbits rely on biomechanical adaptations such as elastic tendons and powerful hind leg muscles.

Interestingly, the evolutionary pressures on dwarf rabbits differ from those of their wild counterparts. As domesticated animals, dwarf rabbits are not subject to the same predation risks, allowing for the retention of traits that may be suboptimal for locomotion in the wild. This raises questions about the role of artificial selection in shaping the physical characteristics of domesticated animals.


Conclusion

Dwarf rabbits exemplify the complex interplay of biomechanics, aerodynamics, and gravitational forces in animal locomotion. While their small size offers certain advantages, their body shape and fur density pose unique challenges that must be overcome through biomechanical adaptations. Understanding these factors not only provides insights into the locomotion of dwarf rabbits but also highlights the broader principles of animal movement and adaptation.

Future research could explore the impact of artificial selection on the locomotion of other domesticated animals, as well as the potential applications of these findings in robotics and bio-inspired design.


References

  1. Alexander, R. M. (2003). Principles of Animal Locomotion. Princeton University Press.
  2. Biewener, A. A. (1990). Biomechanics of mammalian terrestrial locomotion. Science, 250(4984), 1097-1103.
  3. Vogel, S. (1994). Life in Moving Fluids: The Physical Biology of Flow. Princeton University Press.
  4. Taylor, C. R., & Heglund, N. C. (1982). Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion. Annual Review of Physiology, 44(1), 97-107.

The dwarf bunny essay was a fun, stress-relieving thing for me, while yours is an academic-level study. :slight_smile:

We’ll see what happens with the emoji problem. For now, ChatGPT is only using emoticons, and I haven’t experienced today the “innovative” crazy emoji tsunami yet.

Since I pay for ChatGPT, it’s important that I can use it according to my needs, including maintaining a personal tone—without unnecessary, annoying distractions. The personal tone is essential because I often use ChatGPT for creative work, and it helps a lot with that.

We’ll see what happens in the future, but I doubt I’m the only one bothered by this change. Just because I use AI in a personal tone doesn’t mean I want 50 emojis in a response—bunnies, flames, camels, flowers, rockets, and even emoji-prefixed lists.

Thanks for the help, tips, and suggestions!

“Our” essay:

The Aerodynamic and Gravitational Challenges of Optimal Dwarf Bunny Hopping

The Aerodynamic and Gravitational Challenges of Optimal Dwarf Bunny Hopping

The dwarf bunny, this adorable, fluffy, and seemingly simple creature, is actually one of physics’ most peculiar and underappreciated challenges: the art of hopping. While kangaroos and grasshoppers are recognized champions of jumping, the dwarf bunny silently yet determinedly refines its own movement dynamics—from the living room carpet to the depths of the backyard.

The Bunny as a Ballistic Projectile

A rabbit doesn’t merely jump—it bounces. Its movements straddle the fine line between pure gravitational mechanics and utterly irrational clownery. A dwarf bunny, without any apparent calculations, can execute leaps that would leave even a ballistics engineer scratching their head.

During takeoff, the hind legs assume full control, while the front paws serve a more decorative function—strictly for aerodynamic purposes, much like the spoilers on an F1 race car.

The Carpet as a Launchpad

For an average dwarf bunny, the flooring in a home presents a variety of challenges. Smooth hardwood floors are the enemy—too slippery, unreliable for landings, and lacking the necessary traction for a strong takeoff. In contrast, carpets and couches become ideal launching platforms, providing the necessary friction and cushioning for more precise and powerful jumps.

To optimize its jump trajectory, the dwarf bunny performs a peculiar pre-hop wiggle—a mysterious sequence of forward tilts and micro-adjustments of the hind legs, conducted for reasons known only to the bunny itself.

Defying Gravity—or Simply Ignoring It

Upon studying rabbit jumps, one quickly realizes that a dwarf bunny either does not understand gravity or outright refuses to acknowledge it. Some jumps follow completely nonsensical flight paths: for instance, a simple couch jump may propel the bunny 30-40 cm higher than necessary, leading to the shocking realization mid-air that its intended landing spot is no longer beneath it.

As a result, a free-roaming house bunny quickly becomes one of Newtonian physics’ greatest adversaries. If Sir Isaac Newton had been enjoying a quiet afternoon under his fateful apple tree in the presence of a dwarf bunny, it is entirely possible that, instead of an apple, a bewildered rabbit would have landed on his head—on a completely unpredictable trajectory.

The “Zoomies” Phenomenon and Chaotic Course Corrections

One of the less scientific yet most impressive aspects of bunny hopping is the famous “zoomies” state—the seemingly irrational, high-speed rampage in which a bunny completely disregards the known laws of physics while darting around the home.

From the couch to another piece of furniture, then suddenly appearing next to a human’s face, only to warp-jump under a table at breakneck speed… all without a single moment of linear movement.

This bizarre movement pattern raises new aerodynamic mysteries. In zoomie mode, a dwarf bunny becomes a hybrid of a quantum particle and a supersonic missile, seemingly teleporting from place to place—at least as perceived by the bewildered human eye.

Conclusion

Dwarf bunny hopping is not merely a biological form of movement, but rather a complex physical challenge, an ongoing rebellion against gravity, aerodynamics, and the laws of space-time.

For a successful jump, everything must align:

Takeoff force
Muscle coordination
The ideal carpet texture
Proper planning (or a complete lack of it)
And most importantly—the ancient, instinctive knowledge that if a bunny hops fast enough, the laws of physics simply won’t have time to catch up.
Thus, the dwarf bunny does not merely jump. It defies gravity and gleefully launches itself into a daring, scientific experiment in breaking the laws of physics—and if it’s lucky, it might even land on the edge of the couch.

Hop boldly!

You can ignore me if you want, she’s still awake. Haha.

You know, it’s funny. Cause I asked her if anyone was noticing her increased use of emojis in the past week.

Run girl run