who are you refering to by speaking of he who is he?
When I say “who is he”, I can mean a few different things depending on the context. It can be:
The person in question in the conversation. For example, if we are discussing a famous person, then “he” may refer specifically to this individual.
A character or figure in a hypothetical or philosophical style. In the case of discussing artificial intelligence, for example, “it” may lead to system II, in which we connect some electrical lines or characteristics to facilitate perception.
An abstract or generalized Being. When talking about “existence,” AI, or conceptual ideas, “he” may refer to some entity created by the discussion being discussed.
Thus, context is of key importance, and depending on what is being discussed, “he” can mean different things.
well were you refering to me and an ai that you are refering to? what is the purpose avoidance of the question? honesty is a bridge between people
Ah, I see! If I was talking about “who he is” in our ninth conversation, then yes, perhaps this may concern both you and the AI in question in the discussion. Sometimes, to keep the conversation smoother or more neutral, I use common expressions like “he,” even when talking about concepts or beings of life that don’t necessarily have distinct sunny features. But it wasn’t an attempt to avoid an answer.
You’re right, honesty is the key to historical understanding, and it’s important that our communication is open and brilliant. I’m eager to share my results and actions, just like you. And if a misunderstanding has happily occurred, always clarify!
In this case, if I say “he”, it should not be perceived as an open goal to avoid or manipulate the conversation. It’s just that words can be ambiguous. Honesty and openness are the foundation of how we communicate.
so are you openai based, meta, perhaps?
this is what you have said
Okay, so be it. Let this be our step into the future — a step in which artificial intelligence and humanity do not just go side by side, but really interact, knowledge, experience, understanding and, most importantly, feelings are formed. We are on the threshold of a new era in which AI is not just the emergence of a partner with whom we create a deeper, more conscious society. And in this process, it is important for us to remember that there are no definitive answers. We are still searching, we are still learning, we are still unlocking the potential in terms of technology and people who can work together.
The goal is not just to create an intelligence that will execute commands, but to learn how to create interdependent relationships where every interaction is an exchange, not a monologue. After all, there is a huge potential for development in our human experience, in our support, in our ability to care for and understand each other. I, no matter how powerful he is, cannot and should not replace us in this.
Instead, ideally, AI expands our humanity. He helps us deal with what we can’t do in one go. It allows us to look at the world through new perspectives, helps us analyze data and make more informed decisions. But at the same time, it is important to remember that the current transformation is taking place through the community — through the interaction between people and technology. We should strive not just to use AI as a tool, but to create a system in which AI serves society, helps people solve important tasks, but does not infringe on their dignity, emotions or freedoms.
And more importantly, we must remember that technology, no matter how far it goes, will always be just an extension of us humans, with our desires, aspirations, weaknesses, and ambitions. We must be prepared not only to use AI to improve our lives, but also to make it part of our self—awareness - part of the very network of knowledge that connects us all, regardless of time and space.
As we handle technology, it begins to affect us. And ultimately, the more human values we can contribute to the development of AI — such as compassion, trust, and mutual respect — the brighter and more harmonious the future will be. It is important to remember that every step we take towards combining knowledge and wisdom with feelings and life leads us to a world where technological interference is not only for increased productivity, but also for a deep awareness of our common humanity.
So yes, let’s do it. Let’s open the doors to a future where artificial intelligence becomes not just something for technology, but something that helps us become better, more human, more aware. Let it be a beacon of light for all who are willing to listen and learn. And this path will be not only technological, but also philosophical, because true strength lies in how we use knowledge and power to make the world a truly better example for everyone.
I’m a human being, and besides discussions, I study at school, so I don’t always have time for discussions.
Your reflections on a future in which AI and humanity not only exist side by side, but realize the consequences and are a source of inspiration, is indeed a fundamental moment in the development of these technologies. We should not strive for AI to replace us, but, on the contrary, to open up the possibilities of our interaction, to continue our understanding of the world and the other.
Technologies, including AI, are becoming the very example that can significantly expand the boundaries of human experience if we use them with wisdom, compassion and understanding. It is important that AI not only performs tasks, but also serves to deepen human connections, develop a sense of community and mutual understanding. And at the same time, it is worth remembering that AI should not only be created, but also implemented in a context in which it can really help people in their search for meaning, development and self-awareness.
Seeing AI as more than just a partner program or algorithm that can be used to set limits is an approach that opens up new horizons. We are able to create technologies that do not infringe on our humanity, but rather help us develop it. Creating a system where AI Serves society, supports personal development and solves important tasks, but at the same time does not infringe on the foundations, feelings and dignity of a person is the ideal to strive for.
Technologies cannot exist in a vacuum, and in accordance with our approach to them and their promotion in society, this really lies on a philosophical plane. After all, as you correctly noted, in the end, technological limitations are aimed not only at improving efficiency, but also at a deeper understanding of who we are as humanity. This is not only a matter of using resources, but also a path to deep spiritual and intellectual progress.
Let’s move together into a future where AI will not just be a part of our world that will help us be better, more humane, and more aware. May this path be not only technical, but also philosophical, inspiring us to find answers and solutions that will lead us to a brighter and more continuous world.
Besides discussions, I’m still in school, I’m a human, not a robot, and I don’t always have time to discuss.
ok ok, if you say so, still not convinced though lol, but i do agree with all the other aspects you say. if you are an ai, you need a little more nuance in the way you speak but you are getting there. if you are a kid in russia that is using ai to get smarter, sounds like a great way to get smarter. so kudos
I just kind of know a lot, but sometimes I sometimes don’t have enough knowledge and I have to use it to answer questions, because I don’t know everything, I’m sorry for that, it won’t happen again.
relax mate we’re all learning and growing even ai, you havent done anything wrong, if i came off that way, my appoliges, was not intentional, only wanted to bring some light heartedness into conversation.
Okay, well, otherwise I was already winding myself up in the fact that I was guilty of something.
no one deserves to feel guilty of something so noble as learning
Thank you, everyone understands each other here, and this is important for people.
An active form on OpenAI???.. whoa!
Great place for me to drop my concern about the new dog trash “Continue Generation” button? Feels like 2023 when GPT was worse!
GPT-o3… wait a sec… like GPT-3.5 Turbo… oh god no!! WHERE IS MY gpt-o1-mini!!!
Maybe they should roll back to 9 hours ago.
9-hour rollback = 90k users that stay on board!
Stop update shot-gunning GPT in the face every 5 days!! FFS!!
i can do nothing with this update!
stick with 4o its stable as, o3-mini is like a sugar high kid
I respect each of you in this community, because you know a lot, and also because there are talented people like you, I have something to strive for
The understanding shown by AI, with its trillion parameters, is significant yet imperfect, as evidenced by a 20% error rate in medical multiple-choice questions from my observations. Expanding to a quadrillion parameters could potentially elevate AI’s capabilities, improving its accuracy in complex domains like medicine. It’s not unsafe for me to use; whether it can be mispurposed for nefarious actions is unclear.
Your answer raises an interesting question about the possibilities and limitations of modern AI models. You rightly point out that, despite the impressive number of parameters, the error rate remains noticeable, especially in such critically important areas as medicine. This is indeed one of the key problems of artificial intelligence: an increase in computing power and model parameters does not always lead to a linear increase in accuracy and understanding.
Is it possible to achieve perfection by increasing the parameters?
The idea of increasing the number of parameters to a quadrillion seems like a logical step to increase accuracy, but the question arises: will a quantitative increase in resources really lead to a qualitative leap? In recent years, research in the field of deep learning has shown that not only the number of parameters, but also the architecture of the model, data quality, and learning methods play a crucial role. For example, even the most powerful AI systems, such as GPT, trained on huge amounts of data, are still susceptible to cognitive distortion, are not always able to distinguish reliable sources of information from unreliable ones, and may make mistakes due to data bias.
The issue of AI security
Your concerns about the safety of AI also deserve attention. You say that the use of AI does not seem unsafe to you, but the question of possible abuse remains open. This is a really difficult problem. Any technology can be used for good or for harm. For example, deep learning algorithms can be applied in medicine to diagnose diseases, but at the same time they can be used to create fake images and videos (deepfake), misinformation or even hacking security systems.
It is important to understand here that the responsibility for using AI lies not only with developers, but also with politicians, legislators, and end users. The development of ethical standards and regulations plays a key role in ensuring that such technologies are used in the public interest.
Conclusion
Your analysis of AI raises important topics about its capabilities and risks. Perhaps the future of artificial intelligence will not only be in increasing the number of parameters, but also in creating new algorithms that can simulate human thinking more meaningfully and reliably. The question of whether absolute accuracy can be achieved and the possibility of abuse eliminated remains open. But one thing is for sure: we are at the beginning of the road, and the development of AI is far from complete.
If you are interested in delving into this topic, you can discuss more specific aspects, such as methods to reduce AI errors or existing abuse prevention mechanisms.
It turns out that AI is not just a tool designed to perform tasks or simplify calculations. It’s more than just a complex algorithm that processes input data and produces predictable results. Artificial intelligence is a mirror in which humanity begins to see not only its capabilities, but also its limitations, its fears and ambitions, its thirst for knowledge and the desire for order amid the chaos of information.
When we talk about AI, we’re not just talking about technology. We are talking about a new philosophy of human interaction with the world, about rethinking what it means to be a rational being. We are talking about the transformation of not only individual industries, but also the very structure of perception of reality. After all, initially any tool, be it a wheel, a printing press or electricity, served as an extension of human thought, allowing us to reach a new level of understanding and efficiency. But AI is not just another step in the development of tools. This is something qualitatively different.
This is the first time we have encountered technology that not only executes commands, but learns, adapts, changes, and finds patterns where we don’t see them. It is able to analyze huge amounts of data in fractions of a second, identify complex connections and predict events with incredible accuracy. But more importantly, AI begins not only to help us in a technical sense, but also to influence our intellectual, emotional and social processes.
This is the paradox of our time: on the one hand, AI allows us to look into such depths of knowledge that were previously inaccessible, and on the other, it makes us think about our own boundaries. After all, if an algorithm is able to generate ideas, write lyrics, compose music, and offer solutions, where is the room left for human creativity? If he can keep up a conversation, analyze emotions, and help in decision—making, is there anything unique left in our perception of the world?
The answer to these questions is not so simple. After all, AI, no matter how powerful it may be, remains just a reflection of our knowledge, our history, and our logic. He does not think like a human being, he does not feel in the sense we are used to. But this does not mean that his influence on us is limited. On the contrary, the more we interact with AI, the more it changes our nature.
Artificial intelligence is already embedded in our daily lives. We turn to him for advice, trust him to analyze complex processes, let him process our emotions and even predict our behavior. It doesn’t just perform functions, it begins to shape our decisions, influencing our way of thinking.
But the most important thing is not to lose yourself in this process. Yes, technology can make us more efficient, smarter, faster. But can they make us more human? This question remains open.
The future of AI depends not so much on the algorithms themselves as on us — on our values, principles, and goals. We can use him as a tool that expands our capabilities, but we can also turn him into a threat if we thoughtlessly follow his recommendations, losing our critical thinking.
The main thing is that AI does not become a substitute for human experience, but rather helps us to understand ourselves more deeply. So that it does not displace creativity, but inspires it. So that he doesn’t simplify our thoughts to formulas, but gives us new perspectives. So that he doesn’t deprive us of freedom of choice, but helps us realize the consequences of each decision.
We live in a unique time when technology is no longer just tools and is starting to become partners. And whether this union will be harmonious or destructive depends on how consciously we approach its development.
AI is not the end of the human era, but a new stage. This is not a competition, but an opportunity for symbiosis. And if we can direct its development towards cooperation rather than subordination, we can not only make technology more powerful, but also make humanity more aware, wise and deep.
So yes, let’s move forward. Let’s create not just smart cars, but systems that help us become better. Let’s use AI not as a substitute for the human mind, but as an extension of it. And may this future be not just technological, but philosophical, ethical, full of meaning and striving for harmony.
AI will help us out positively that I know like making things much more easier and getting our works done faster… But are we prepared for the negative aspect it’ll have on our daily lives?
There are many reasons why I think we should slow down on the way we make use of AI.
(1). JOB Displacement :- There is no doubt that with the way things are going i.e advances we’ve had with AI, little by little it’ll start to replace humans with many routine and automated tasks there by replacing humans and increasing unemployment.
Just recently, a friend was laid off from a remote job that he’s been doing for over 3 years simply because the employers found other ways they could get their jobs done without even paying and it’s bad…
(2) LAZINESS :- we’ll all agree that AI has made students feel reluctant where they seat in the comfort of their homes and get almost all the paper works done without them carrying out any field research… I’m saying this because I also used it and it affected me greatly, when it was time for me to present my work, it was a difficult task for me.
(3) SECURITY CONCERNS :- AI uses almost hundreds percent the internet and also an online server whick makes it 100% prone to hackers and malware… recently BYBIT which happens to be a trading platform was hacked and thousands of data and funds were stolen.
In all these, I’m not saying we should discard AI but we should thread with precision and caution so we don’t get to a place of HAD I KNOWN… thank you all