@Foxalabs As a follow up to your initial suggestion, here are two examples of me providing code and evaluation in two specific ways to optimise towards the expected response.
- In this I have provided a single sentence explanation accompanying the code evaluation under “examples of code”.
Prompt given -
CODING:
Now you have been provided with the QUESTION, INPUT, OUTPUT, EXAMPLE that is asked to the candidate and the candidate's response as the SOURCE CODE. Evaluate the SOURCE CODE based on the following GUIDELINES and SCORING METRIC. Do not consider the INPUT, OUTPUT or EXAMPLE while scoring or evaluation. Only consider the SOURCE CODE given. Refer to the SCORING METRIC to understand how to allocate a score to each of the PARAMETERS defined in the GUIDELINES. For your reference some examples of code have also been provided under EXAMPLES OF CODE.
GUIDELINES:
- Just check the code given and consider no other input while evaluating the SOURCE CODE
- Evaluate the SOURCE CODE based on PARAMETERS which are Coding, Data structures and algorithms and Efficiency.
- Coding is evaluated by how many steps of the solution the candidate was correctly able to implement and if they were able to structure the code properly. Follow the first point in SCORING METRIC for Coding and allocate a score.
- Data structures and algorithms are evaluated by checking if the best approach which means the ideal data structure and algorithm was used to solve the question. By ideal we mean the one that leads to lowest time and space complexity. Follow the second point in the SCORING METRIC for Data structures and algorithms and allocate a score.
- Efficiency is evaluated by calculating the time and space complexity of the SOURCE CODE and comparing it with the best time and space complexity possible for the solution. Follow the third point in the SCORING METRIC for Efficiency and allocate a score.
- If the Coding score is more than zero only then the subsequent PARAMETERS should be marked on otherwise it should be zero. While marking bear in mind the following - SOURCE CODE is well formatted, readable, contains only lines that are run in the program and follows all the basic conventions of the language it is written in. If there is no new code that can be compiled and run and only comments please mark as zero.
- Give your evaluation based on the above PARAMETERS in a json format where the key is the parameter and score and the value is an EXPLANATION.
- EXPLANATION is an explanation of how you arrived at the score given for each of the PARAMETERS.
- The scoring is done on a scale of 5 and use only whole numbers as the score allocated.
- Be consistent in all the evaluations you make.
SCORING METRIC:
- Coding:
Score 0 : No code provided or commented code or just a template provided that returns a preset value or prints a value directly.
Score 1: The code provided is incomplete or does not run at all.
Score 2: The code provided contains syntax errors or logical errors that prevent it from working correctly.
Score 3: The code provided correctly implements the logic to determine whether a number is Supreme, but could be improved in terms of code organization, structure, and readability.
Score 4: The code provided is well-organized and structured, follows best practices, and is easy to read and understand.
Score 5: The code provided is exceptional in terms of organization, structure, and readability, and demonstrates mastery of the language and programming concepts.
-Data structures and algorithm:
Score 0: Coding score which is the score of the previous parameter has been allocated as zero.
Score 1: The approach taken is highly inefficient or incorrect, and may not produce the correct output for some inputs.
Score 2: The approach taken is correct but highly inefficient, and may not scale well for larger inputs.
Score 3: The approach taken is reasonably efficient and correct, but there are more optimal solutions possible.
Score 4: The approach taken is highly efficient and correct, and demonstrates a good understanding of data structures and algorithms.
Score 5: The approach taken is optimal in terms of time and space complexity, and demonstrates exceptional skill and understanding of data structures and algorithms.
-Efficiency:
Score 0 : Coding score has been allocated zero.
Score 1: The code provided is highly inefficient and may take an unreasonable amount of time or memory to complete, or may not produce the correct output for some inputs.
Score 2: The code provided is somewhat inefficient and may take longer or require more memory than necessary to complete.
Score 3: The code provided is reasonably efficient and should be able to handle most inputs without issue.
Score 4: The code provided is highly efficient and should be able to handle larger inputs with ease.
Score 5: The code provided is optimal in terms of time and space complexity, and should be able to handle the largest inputs without issue.
QUESTION:
Your task is to write an algorithm to determine if a number N is Supreme.
A Supreme number is a number defined by the following process
Starting with any positive integer, replace the number with the sum of the squares of its digits.
Repeat the process until the number equals 1 (where it will stay), or it loops endlessly in a cycle which does not include 1.
Those numbers for which this process ends in 1 are Supreme.
Print Yes if N is a Supreme number, and No if not.
INPUT:
The first line of the input contains a single integer N.
Constraints
1 ≤ N ≤ 2^31-1
OUTPUT:
Print Yes if the number is Supreme Number otherwise print No.
EXAMPLE:
'Sample Input
19
Sample Output
Yes
Explanation
1^2 + 9^2 = 82
8^2 + 2^2 = 68
6^2 + 8^2 = 100
1^2 + 1^2 + 0^2 = 1
Hence the result is 1, so it's a Supreme Number.'
SOURCE CODE:
#your code here
EXAMPLES OF CODE:
-Example of a coding score of 0 is given below:
# No code provided or commented code or just a template provided that returns a preset value or prints a value directly.
print("Hello World!")
-Example of a coding score of 5 is given below:
# The code provided is exceptional in terms of organization, structure, and readability, and demonstrates mastery of the language and programming concepts.
def is_supreme(num):
while num > 1:
new_num = 0
for digit in str(num):
new_num += int(digit)**2
num = new_num
return num == 1
def main():
n = int(input())
if is_supreme(n):
print("Yes")
else:
print("No")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
OUTPUT FORMAT:
Please print the response based on the following guidelines.
- Provide the CODING rounds' evaluation under the header "Coding Round Evaluation" and score against each of the parameters mentioned.
Response from Chatgpt- (This is wrong and not the expected outcome)
{
"Coding Round Evaluation":
{
"Score": 4,
"Explanation": "The code provided is well-organized and structured, follows best practices, and is easy to read and understand. The main function calls another function is_supreme which contains the implementation of the algorithm."
},
"Data structures and algorithm":
{
"Score": 4,
"Explanation": "The approach taken is highly efficient and correct. The algorithm uses the approach of calculating the sum of squares of digits and checking if it equals to 1 or 4 (infinite loop) and keeps updating the number until it either reaches 1 or 4. The approach is optimal in terms of time complexity and can handle larger inputs with ease."
},
"Efficiency":
{
"Score": 4,
"Explanation": "The code provided is highly efficient and should be able to handle larger inputs with ease. The time complexity of the algorithm is O(log n) and the space complexity is O(1), which is optimal and can handle the largest inputs without issue."
}
- In this I have provided a pair of the code and the evaluation comprising of two examples consisting of a low and high score.
Prompt -
CODING:
Now you have been provided with the QUESTION, INPUT, OUTPUT, EXAMPLE that is asked to the candidate and the candidate's response as the SOURCE CODE. Evaluate the SOURCE CODE based on the following GUIDELINES and SCORING METRIC. Do not consider the INPUT, OUTPUT or EXAMPLE while scoring or evaluation. Only consider the SOURCE CODE given. Refer to the SCORING METRIC to understand how to allocate a score to each of the PARAMETERS defined in the GUIDELINES. For your reference some examples of code have also been provided under EXAMPLES OF CODE.
GUIDELINES:
- Just check the code given and consider no other input while evaluating the SOURCE CODE
- Evaluate the SOURCE CODE based on PARAMETERS which are Coding, Data structures and algorithms and Efficiency.
- Coding is evaluated by how many steps of the solution the candidate was correctly able to implement and if they were able to structure the code properly. Follow the first point in SCORING METRIC for Coding and allocate a score.
- Data structures and algorithms are evaluated by checking if the best approach which means the ideal data structure and algorithm was used to solve the question. By ideal we mean the one that leads to lowest time and space complexity. Follow the second point in the SCORING METRIC for Data structures and algorithms and allocate a score.
- Efficiency is evaluated by calculating the time and space complexity of the SOURCE CODE and comparing it with the best time and space complexity possible for the solution. Follow the third point in the SCORING METRIC for Efficiency and allocate a score.
- If the Coding score is more than zero only then the subsequent PARAMETERS should be marked on otherwise it should be zero. While marking bear in mind the following - SOURCE CODE is well formatted, readable, contains only lines that are run in the program and follows all the basic conventions of the language it is written in. If there is no new code that can be compiled and run and only comments please mark as zero.
- Give your evaluation based on the above PARAMETERS in a json format where the key is the parameter and score and the value is an EXPLANATION.
- EXPLANATION is an explanation of how you arrived at the score given for each of the PARAMETERS.
- The scoring is done on a scale of 5 and use only whole numbers as the score allocated.
- Be consistent in all the evaluations you make.
SCORING METRIC:
- Coding:
Score 0 : No code provided or commented code or just a template provided that returns a preset value or prints a value directly.
Score 1: The code provided is incomplete or does not run at all.
Score 2: The code provided contains syntax errors or logical errors that prevent it from working correctly.
Score 3: The code provided correctly implements the logic to determine whether a number is Supreme, but could be improved in terms of code organization, structure, and readability.
Score 4: The code provided is well-organized and structured, follows best practices, and is easy to read and understand.
Score 5: The code provided is exceptional in terms of organization, structure, and readability, and demonstrates mastery of the language and programming concepts.
-Data structures and algorithm:
Score 0: Coding score which is the score of the previous parameter has been allocated as zero.
Score 1: The approach taken is highly inefficient or incorrect, and may not produce the correct output for some inputs.
Score 2: The approach taken is correct but highly inefficient, and may not scale well for larger inputs.
Score 3: The approach taken is reasonably efficient and correct, but there are more optimal solutions possible.
Score 4: The approach taken is highly efficient and correct, and demonstrates a good understanding of data structures and algorithms.
Score 5: The approach taken is optimal in terms of time and space complexity, and demonstrates exceptional skill and understanding of data structures and algorithms.
-Efficiency:
Score 0 : Coding score has been allocated zero.
Score 1: The code provided is highly inefficient and may take an unreasonable amount of time or memory to complete, or may not produce the correct output for some inputs.
Score 2: The code provided is somewhat inefficient and may take longer or require more memory than necessary to complete.
Score 3: The code provided is reasonably efficient and should be able to handle most inputs without issue.
Score 4: The code provided is highly efficient and should be able to handle larger inputs with ease.
Score 5: The code provided is optimal in terms of time and space complexity, and should be able to handle the largest inputs without issue.
QUESTION:
Your task is to write an algorithm to determine if a number N is Supreme.
A Supreme number is a number defined by the following process
Starting with any positive integer, replace the number with the sum of the squares of its digits.
Repeat the process until the number equals 1 (where it will stay), or it loops endlessly in a cycle which does not include 1.
Those numbers for which this process ends in 1 are Supreme.
Print Yes if N is a Supreme number, and No if not.
INPUT:
The first line of the input contains a single integer N.
Constraints
1 ≤ N ≤ 2^31-1
OUTPUT:
Print Yes if the number is Supreme Number otherwise print No.
EXAMPLE:
'Sample Input
19
Sample Output
Yes
Explanation
1^2 + 9^2 = 82
8^2 + 2^2 = 68
6^2 + 8^2 = 100
1^2 + 1^2 + 0^2 = 1
Hence the result is 1, so it's a Supreme Number.'
SOURCE CODE:
#your code here
EXAMPLES OF CODE:
Example of a coding score of 0 is given below:
CODE-
# No code provided or commented code or just a template provided that returns a preset value or prints a value directly.
print("Hello World!")
EVALUATION -
Coding Round Evaluation:
Coding:
Score: 0
No code has been provided for evaluation.
Data Structures and Algorithms:
Score: 0
No code has been provided for evaluation.
Efficiency:
Score: 0
No code has been provided for evaluation.
-Example of a coding score of 5 is given below:
CODE:
# The code provided is exceptional in terms of organization, structure, and readability, and demonstrates mastery of the language and programming concepts.
def is_supreme(num):
while num > 1:
new_num = 0
for digit in str(num):
new_num += int(digit)**2
num = new_num
return num == 1
def main():
n = int(input())
if is_supreme(n):
print("Yes")
else:
print("No")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
EVALUATION:
Coding:
Score: 5
The code demonstrates mastery of the language and programming concepts. It follows the best practices of coding and is well-structured and easy to understand.
Data Structures and Algorithms:
Score: 5
The code uses the most efficient algorithm to solve the problem and implements it using an optimal data structure. The approach taken is optimal for the problem.
Efficiency:
Score: 5
The time and space complexity of the algorithm are both optimal, O(log n), where n is the input number. The code efficiently implements the logic to determine if a number is Supreme.
OUTPUT FORMAT:
Please print the response based on the following guidelines.
- Provide the CODING rounds' evaluation under the header "Coding Round Evaluation" and score against each of the parameters mentioned.
Response from ChatGPT- (Not the expected response and same as the response got originally)
{
"Coding Round Evaluation": {
"Coding": 3,
"Data Structures and Algorithms": 3,
"Efficiency": 3
}
}
EXPLANATION:
Coding:
Score: 3
The code correctly implements the logic to determine if a number is Supreme. However, it could be improved in terms of code organization, structure, and readability.
Data Structures and Algorithms:
Score: 3
The code uses an efficient algorithm to solve the problem but could be further optimized to reduce time complexity. The approach taken is reasonably efficient and correct, but there are more optimal solutions possible.
Efficiency:
Score: 3
The time and space complexity of the algorithm are both reasonably efficient but could be further optimized. The code is efficient enough to handle most inputs without issue.