API usage policy: Professional needs to review chat messages? Medical app

I am using the OpenAI API to act as an expert longevity doctor via a chat interface in an app. No persistent or personal data is stored. The app only responds to user messages by referencing high-impact medical sources in the LLM’s baseline knowledge.

The app is becoming popular and I need to find a way to monetize it. However, I am concerned about OpenAI’s policies on medical/health use such as the following from their “Usage Policies” page:

Don’t perform or facilitate the following activities that may significantly impair the safety, wellbeing, or rights of others, including:

  1. Providing tailored legal, medical/health, or financial advice without review by a qualified professional and disclosure of the use of AI assistance and its potential limitations

Does anyone have any experience in this realm ? It looks like employing a “review by a qualified professional and disclosure of the use of AI assistance and its potential limitations” may be one way to satisfy the usage policy, but how would a qualified professional review streaming private chat messages?

Human In Loop principles may apply.
So it is best to contact OpenAI’s legal department for more information.

It’s possible you are right, but I don’t know. Even Claude API usage says: “Legal, medical, and financial advice offered by Claude must be reviewed by professionals in the relevant field.”

Maybe I shall fire an email to openAI legal department and get clarification.

Anyone else have any comments?

You can contact legal at legal@openai.com

2 Likes

I contacted OpenAI legal and they were fine with my app (provided link to the product, etc), however, having a disclaimer is not good enough: You need to also not store personal data, can not make recommendations on health/medical, etc (information must just be general). So I had to change some things on the marketing front.

Thought I’d provide that update in case others found it useful.

2 Likes

Thanks for informing me about this.
I would need to inquire about the case in individual cases, but it may be of some help to others🙂