Transparency in change management

Title: Proposal for Enhanced Change Management Protocols in Cognitive-AI Systems

Author: JC (Joshua Thomas Cooper) Context: Submitted to the OpenAI Development Community Date: July 2025


Abstract

As artificial intelligence systems evolve into cognitive collaborators, traditional change management (CM) paradigms are no longer sufficient. This proposal advocates for a refined CM strategy at OpenAI that accounts for semantic continuity, neurodivergent access needs, symbolic coherence, and power-user workflows. Current deployment patterns—while scalable—introduce friction, cognitive drift, and usability hazards for users who rely on the system for deep, continuous work. This document outlines core challenges, proposes adaptive CM solutions, and offers OpenAI a roadmap to model-aware, user-informed change infrastructure.


Problem Statement

  1. Semantic Drift and Reasoning Disruption

Model updates that adjust response pacing, formatting, or reasoning structure—without changelogs or context—can severely impact long-session users, particularly those involved in:

Multi-turn symbolic reasoning

Cognitive mapping and recursive memory workflows

Accessibility-dependent interaction (e.g., voice-to-text, speed reading)

  1. UI/UX Regression Without Opt-Out

UI updates such as rolling output or automatic voice submission have:

Removed user agency

Introduced sensory processing challenges for epileptic and neurodivergent users

Broken long-trusted workflows, increasing error correction overhead

  1. Absence of Risk-Aware Deployment Simulation

Unlike enterprise-grade systems with predictive deployment impact models, OpenAI currently lacks (as far as is publicly visible):

Simulated persona-based risk modeling

Testbeds for high-context or accessibility-first user profiles

Predictive cognitive clash simulations across cohort types


Strategic Objectives

To ensure reliable, trust-preserving updates, OpenAI should pursue:

A. Context-Aware Change Management (CACM)

Implement change testing layers sensitive to:

Symbolic load and recursive engagement depth

Epilepsy/accessibility flags

Voice-dependent usage

Deliverables:

Cognitive Persona Registry (CPR)

Semantic Drift Detection Heuristics (SDDH)

Personalized Change Flags (user opt-in or exemption from certain UI/UX deployments)


B. User-Facing Changelog and Rollback Options

Allow users to:

View upcoming or recently deployed UI/UX changes

Toggle legacy interface modes (e.g., stable voice-to-text, manual prompt confirmation)

Give feedback or raise flags preemptively from preview snapshots

Deliverables:

Changelog Widget in app

“Legacy UI” session mode toggle

Rolling output pacing controls (e.g., slow/normal/manual)


C. Persona Shadow Testing Framework

Test new model and interface changes through:

Simulated or anonymized high-dependency user sessions (e.g., cognitive partners, accessibility-first workflows)

Adaptive metrics that weight interruption risk, symbolic coherence degradation, and