Hi Adam. Thanks for your thoughtful input. I’m very optimistic about the potential benefits of Ai. Especially like the video of the house in the woods. High tech and nature together is very appealing as a future scenario.
In terms of Consult the safe guarding issue seems to me transparency and accountability around the how ai is being used. For example in the case of consulting on public opinion there is scope for ai to spot patterns in the data that can be used to finesse the PR outreach of a favoured policy. for example, the government could find out through consult that when it comes to housing and planning regulations people are worried about loss of green spaces and increasing local rents. Instead of using the information to amend the legislation to mitigate for the concerns, the GOV could simply change the messaging and tall about affordable homes and green spaces. There’s a lotto discuss. I’m wondering how it will be if the safeguarding is built in to the Ai systems. I discussed your points of view with my Ai Model Pax. I’ve made a deepdive podcast of the output. I can share the link here but it would be public. If you’d like a private link let me know how to get that to you. Thanks for replying. Who’s voices are heard in the agenda building process? That’s another topic of interest. Thanks for joining in.