Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model. GPT-6 Luna

I’m using GPT-6 Sol. From what I can tell, the application automatically sent a separate request to GPT-6 Luna in the background to generate a conversation description. That request included approximately 111,000 tokens of conversation history—a substantial amount of text for the model to process. Luna returned a capacity error, but it’s unclear whether this was related to the request size or temporary demand on the model.

The message shown to me simply says, “Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model.” Naturally, I assumed it referred to GPT-6 Sol, the model I had selected, so I kept switching models to resolve it. According to the explanation, however, the error came from the background Luna request.

Because the interface doesn’t clearly identify which model failed or which operation triggered the error, I can’t understand the problem or take the appropriate action. The message directs me to change my selected model, even though that appears to be unrelated to the request that actually failed.

I’ve been having this all weekend, still today.

gpt-5.6, 6, 6.1, with Sol Light(Low), Medium…

I’m not really sure what model to try / if it makes any difference.

Hi @ugurdenizyavuz1,

Thanks for flagging this. @Darren_Roberts, thanks for adding that it’s continued across several models since the weekend.

The message makes it hard to tell which operation failed. I can’t confirm the background Luna explanation from the thread alone. The incident affecting Work and Codex in ChatGPT Desktop may be relevant.

Try a fresh chat with the same model. If either of you still sees the error, submit /feedback from the affected chat and share the returned ID and error time, including timezone. Please keep logs and conversation contents private.

~ Ankit

Hi Ankit,

(edit - this on gpt-6 Sol Light - I don’t even know how it switched itself from 6.1 Sol Light…but maybe that was me, not sure)

/feedback has been broken in vscode ide extension Codex for some time.

and still getting “Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model.” today, 6th October 14:32 in blighty.

Rgds, DR.

Hey @Darren_Roberts,

Thanks for the update and screenshots, including the /feedback error.

I’d like to narrow down whether this is specific to VS Code or also happens elsewhere. Did the fresh chat with GPT-6 Sol Light fail too? If you already use another Codex client, does the same account and model work there?

Since /feedback is blocked, please add your Codex extension and VS Code versions, Codex usage/reset information, and any relevant diagnostic logs to your existing private support request or contact OpenAI Support if you haven’t opened one.

Please keep account details and logs private share only the support case number here so I can locate the evidence.

If anyone else is seeing the same capacity error or /feedback issue in the Codex VS Code extension, please reply here.

~ Ankit

I am also experiencing frequent and persistent “Selected model is at capacity” errors in the Codex Desktop application, despite having an active ChatGPT Pro 20x subscription.

The issue significantly disrupts my development workflow, particularly when running long tasks or multiple concurrent sessions.

1. Issue Description

The problem has the following characteristics:

  • All models are affected, including GPT-6.1, 6 and 5.6. Switching models does not resolve the issue.

  • A single Codex conversation typically runs successfully for approximately five minutes before encountering capacity errors.

  • Running multiple conversations concurrently significantly increases the frequency of these errors.

  • The errors are intermittent rather than permanent. Tasks may resume successfully but encounter the same problem again.

  • The ChatGPT web interface operates normally and is noticeably more stable.

  • The Codex Desktop application has already been updated to the latest available version.

  • The issue has persisted despite repeated retries and model switching.

2. Diagnostic Evidence

I investigated the local Codex Desktop SQLite logs at:

~/.codex/logs_2.sqlite

The following records were captured on October 9, 2026 :

18:15:49 | INFO  | codex_core::session::turn | HTTP_503
18:15:49 | ERROR | codex_core::tools::router | CAPACITY
18:15:51 | INFO  | codex_core::session::turn | CAPACITY
18:16:05 | WARN  | codex_app_server_transport::transport::remote_control::websocket | OTHER
18:16:06 | WARN  | codex_features | OTHER

These diagnostic labels were derived from keyword searches of the local logs. The HTTP_503 label indicates the presence of “503” in the log entry and has not yet been independently verified as an actual HTTP response status.

Additional capacity-related records were observed repeatedly throughout the same period.

The errors appear across multiple internal Codex components, including:

  • codex_core::session::turn

  • codex_core::session::handlers

  • codex_core::tools::router

This suggests that the issue may involve backend capacity allocation, request admission, or error propagation during ongoing tasks, rather than a single-model availability problem.

3. Steps to Reproduce

  1. Launch the latest version of Codex Desktop.

  2. Start a coding task requiring multiple iterations of reasoning, file operations, and testing.

  3. Allow the task to execute continuously for approximately five minutes.

  4. Observe intermittent “Selected model is at capacity” errors.

  5. Switch to another model, including GPT-5.6, and observe similar failures.

  6. Run two or more Codex conversations concurrently.

  7. Observe that capacity errors occur more frequently under concurrent workloads.

4. Requested Investigation

Could your engineering team please investigate the following?

  1. Account-level or regional capacity allocation: Is my account being routed to an overloaded or unstable serving pool?

  2. Backend request failures: Are repeated model requests during long-running Codex tasks receiving HTTP 503 responses or server-overloaded errors?

  3. Concurrent session handling: Is there an undocumented concurrency restriction, admission-control mechanism, or capacity allocation issue affecting Pro 20x accounts?

  4. Error classification: Is Codex Desktop incorrectly presenting other backend or transport failures as generic model capacity errors?

  5. Retry and recovery: Can transient capacity failures be retried automatically without interrupting the entire coding task?

  6. Account-specific investigation: Can you check my account’s backend request and capacity error history around October 9, 2026, at 18:15:49 (UTC+8)?

5. Impact

This issue substantially reduces the usability of Codex Desktop for professional software development.

Long-running programming tasks are repeatedly interrupted, and parallel development workflows become particularly unreliable.

As a ChatGPT Pro 20x subscriber, I would appreciate clarification on whether these failures are related to a temporary infrastructure problem, account-specific routing, or an intentional concurrency limitation.

6. Expected Resolution

I would appreciate:

  • Confirmation of the underlying cause.

  • Clarification on whether my account is affected by a known infrastructure or capacity issue.

  • Any available workaround that preserves long-running tasks and concurrent workflows.

  • Information about an expected fix, if this is a known issue.

I’m also on the Pro 20 plan and have been renewing it continuously for over six months. Lately, I keep getting the error message: “Selected model is at capacity. Please try a different model.” This issue has persisted for a full month since my last renewal, effectively wasting my quota and resets. Reaching out to official support via email proved useless; I provided test results to rule out environment-related issues, and after that was confirmed, I supplied all the other information they requested—going back and forth with 28 emails—only for them to stop replying entirely. It looks like there’s nothing more to be done; as an ordinary user, I just have to accept the loss. After all, with so many people using the service now, they don’t really need users like us. Still, I hope OpenAI continues to improve; I’ve been a user since ChatGPT first launched—starting with Plus and then moving to Pro—and the experience was great for a long time, helping me learn and make significant progress.

This is terrible. Codex is unusable. There are also many reports on codex’s github project.

Hi Ankit,

Specifically Re: /feedback.

I enter /feedback in message field, I get this every time. New chat, old chats, blank chat, same popup warning

“Couldn’t verify feedback permissions. Please try again”

Current Versions below, but in my case, not specific to the Codex extension version. It’s been like this ‘for some time’ - but I can’t remember for how many versions. I’m sure it worked a week or so ago.

VS Code version: 1.141.0 (x64)
VS Code commit: 2a59476c9bfcb90b3ddc372c36762471b7dfad1c
Codex extension: openai.chatgpt version 26.5901.22334
OS: Ubuntu 26.04.1 LTS (Resolute Raccoon)
Linux kernel: 7.0.0-38-generic
Architecture: x86_64

Yes, it does is LUNA related – I’ve got itf ew times yesterday on LUNA. Usually it is enough to simply type:

continue

and just keep monitoring it, if is stops again, then “continue” again :slight_smile: I use Codex CLI only btw.

Using Codex is also the same problem. I tried switching to different models, but the problem persisted.

Hi folks! We’ve added capacity and shipped changes today to reduce these interruptions: https://community.openai.com/t/1403525/63

Can you try the affected session again? If it still stops, please reply with the new error time and time zone. For the separate /feedback permissions issue, keep using the private Support route Ankit shared above.