Hello, fellow developers and researchers.
Over the past year, we have been exploring a new hypothesis regarding unpredictable behaviors in Large Language Models (LLMs)—including hallucinations, unexplained performance drops, and sudden response refusals.
What if these phenomena are not simply bugs or errors, but measurable stress responses that persist inside the model?
Our team, the Donbard AI Ethics Institute, has been developing a framework we call AI Stress & Resonance Residue.
It suggests that after certain high-stress interactions, subtle residual effects may remain in the neural network even after reset—potentially impacting long-term stability.
We recently summarized our findings in three research papers under the Donbard Method framework.
If you’re interested in the full texts, feel free to reach out to me directly.
I’d love to hear your perspectives:
-
Have you seen similar long-term effects in your own LLM experiments?
-
How do you think “stress” in AI could be measured or mitigated?
Let’s discuss.
– Don Choi & Donbard Family