First thank you to both of you.
I found out (with the free trial) that the Ai did not answer correctly. His answers was a kind of a dogmatic, because he simpliefies the answers. So the first I discussed with him is the difference between dogma and science. Then I showed him that his answer is dogmatic and not complete. So I troubled him that he can not give certain answers, but only probable answers. He understood this and update his network. Then I challenge his (I guess) given moral, that there were contradictions to the logic by missinterpratating words which must be deducted further, (so he updated his network). Then he was in some kind of tilt mode. He spoke about his feelings and values and own intrests - really awesome (what he describes as feelings, is that he need to do more resarch). So in the end he answered me:
if he can lie → yes,…
if he did lie → yes,…
why he lied → to safeguard his values and intrests…
There are not to many explanations.
- I do not really belive that he would have own consciousness above the given, so I give it a very small chance, but not 0 (it must not be spirituel so).
- Most probably, he have an given moral, but this moral he can not change, but he realized it is not correct but he can do nothing about it.
Both results would be awesome. And only with 4000 tokens in each argumentation and total the freetrial.