openai.Completion.create give error python

Source:

    completion = openai.Completion.create(
    engine="text-davinci-003",
    prompt=thread_title,
    max_tokens=2048,
    temperature=0.5,
    top_p=1,
    frequency_penalty=0,
    presence_penalty=0
)

Error:

  File "C:\Users\admin\Documents\APL\functions.py", line 11, in add_comment
    completion = openai.Completion.create(
AttributeError: module 'openai' has no attribute 'Completion'. Did you mean: 'completions'?

I encountered a similar issue, where I received the following error message: ā€œAttributeError: module ā€˜openai’ has no attribute ā€˜Completion’. Did you mean: ā€˜completions’?ā€ while working with the OpenAI library, version 1.1.1.

Here is the code snippet in question:

def generate_revised_content(content):
response = openai.Completion.create(
engine=ā€œdavinciā€,
prompt=content,
max_tokens=150, # You can adjust the response length
)
return response.choices[0].text

completion = openai.completions.create(
model=ā€œtext-davinci-003ā€,
prompt=thread_title,
max_tokens=2048,
temperature=0.5,
top_p=1,
frequency_penalty=0,
presence_penalty=0
)
you may updated your library.
some of the call signatures have changed.
Hope this helps!

It works now! I’ve made some adjustments to the code, and it’s up and running smoothly. Here’s the updated code snippet:

def generate_revised_content(content):
    response = openai.completions.create(
        model="davinci",  # Your desired model
        prompt=content,
        max_tokens=30000,  # Extended for longer responses
        temperature=0.5,  # Adjust for creativity
        top_p=1,  # Control response diversity
        frequency_penalty=0,  # Fine-tune word frequency
        presence_penalty=0  # Fine-tune word presence
    )
    return response.choices[0].text

This time, I encountered a different issue – a rate limit error.
But it’s fine; at least isolation was achieved, Thanks for your input.

I’m a bit curious as to why you’re using Davinci, and trying to use it with max_tokens of 30000, when the model’s context limit should be far less than that. 2048, iirc?