Official 2025 Dall-E Mega Gallery 🍀

[_j]

@Tina_ChiKa

are those 5 fingers on the left hand

That’s the joke! One of the common faults early on was in an incorrect number of digits on the hand. In reproducing this symptom, DALL-E was still wrong: I didn’t get my “7-fingered man”.

@hugebelts

A woman with long dark hair is seated at a wooden table in a library, writing in a notebook. (Captioned by AI)1024×1024 94.5 KB

This uses an extensive json compared to my previous post.

How about:

The final passes of ChatGPT’s DALL-E seem to preclude even the most potentially natural person, giving a dimpled-oversharp mottling when the plastic oily skin texture is replaced. This is probably the closest that sending deliberation into happenstance will deliver.

Or just mediocre except for feature reproduction of the original

— a high water from elsewhere starting with “G” to bring about a photograph, (now showing a version prompted ideally for that platform.)

[PaulBellow]

[gdfrza]

I like this " comic/ cartoon" type , I suppose is possible create a manga or similar

[DIO94]

[DIO94]

[birdkokane]

Bravo and well done. i am curious how much knowledge you have from art as a whole and how far a techie can get without proper art knowledge. stem your prompts from art or from how to ‘manipulate’ and LLM or other model?

[hugebelts]

Thanks @birdkokane.

I definitely got a lot of experience in:

• Photography (several years of photographing, different color systems like not only RGB, sRGB or so, but also the others like XYZ, IRgBy and what not… There are quite some. Dealt with ALL of them. Because I also work as a software developer. Before as architect, developer of larger systems, then I changed sides: Software Test Automation Engineering.

The prompts stem from:

→ Curiosity

• I may try the “stupidest” silly stuff first, that no one may have had in mind. For example
• What image do I get if I tell to a model just:
  18479485485 v485j ewrjeriEORweuir (a random string).
• What happens if I use a prompt with commas?
• A Recipe (for food for instance)

→ Experience

• If you know or assume how systems may react OR are good about figuring out their pattern
  you may be able to talk to them quicker, better or in a more calibrated way

→ Experimenting

• I may put in what no one did. Because people may think: This makes no sense.
  I got no limits here in my head. Just trying and see what works.
  For example: Let’s put in a song text. A poem. etc.

→ Transferring

• Trying prompts of the experiments above (maybe even from another online platform) in ChatGPT then.
• Do they perform the same?
• Yes → We’re most likely done and can render equally as well.
• No? → What’s needed to close the gap.

Further Possible Steps/Workflows

For example this may then produce after some trials, figuring out, and some iterations:

The last step could then be, if you’ve figured out the steps that work, chisel them into a Custom GPT. Then you can reuse them there. After some usages of the Custom GPT you could iterate the workflow once more: To show the model the chat so far from your custom gpt. Just copy the whole text AND then tell it to figure out the iterative workflow. (you can also copy this into o3-Mini-High or so or even run a Deep Research on it,… etc.)

And then you should have a pretty solid outstanding workflow.

I hope this makes sense.

P.S.: You could also start with a meta prompt as an easy start to catapult you forward a lot of steps quite quickly before you need to start finetuning.

That’s basically the json I’ve used before and told GPT to fill in a mixed ethnicity (that was my first test). Later, I told it to use this json below as a template for each pic.

{
  "scene": {
    "description": "Highly realistic indoor scene with natural sunlight",
    "subject": {
      "gender": "female",
      "ethnicity": "Asian-Latina",
      "pose": "seated at a table signing a book, relaxed and confident",
      "facial_expression": {
        "emotion": "calm and focused",
        "realism": {
          "micro_expressions": true,
          "asymmetry": true,
          "muscle_tension": "natural"
        },
        "subtle_details": [
          "slightly raised one eyebrow",
          "faint smile lines near eyes"
        ]
      },
      "skin": {
        "texture": "hyper-realistic",
        "imperfections": [
          "visible pores",
          "fine wrinkles",
          "subtle blemishes",
          "fine vellus hairs"
        ],
        "light_scattering": "subsurface"
      },
      "eyes": {
        "reflections": "natural and moist",
        "asymmetry": "subtle and realistic",
        "eyelashes": "thick, dark lashes with individual strands visible",
        "tear_ducts": "slightly glistening and visible"
      },
      "hair": {
        "style": "naturally styled",
        "strand_detail": "individual strands with realistic variation and flyaways",
        "color_variation": "subtle highlights and lowlights for realism"
      },
      "clothing": {
        "top": {
          "style": "elegant vintage blouse or dress",
          "fabric_texture": "fine cotton with realistic folds",
          "interaction_with_body": "natural drape",
          "wrinkle_detail": "slight wrinkles at points of tension (elbows, waist)"
        },
        "belt": {
          "type": "vintage cinch belt",
          "color": "black",
          "width": "8cm",
          "material": "elastic cotton",
          "placement": "at the natural waist"
        }
      },
      "accessories": {
        "book": {
          "interaction": "holding and signing",
          "realism": "accurate paper texture and natural hand grip"
        },
        "pen": {
          "style": "elegant with realistic reflections"
        }
      }
    },
    "lighting": {
      "type": "golden-hour sunlight through a window",
      "interaction": "soft diffusion with natural shadows and highlights",
      "ambient_effects": [
        "subtle dust particles",
        "warm hue"
      ]
    },
    "background": {
      "setting": "cozy bookstore or indoor environment",
      "depth_of_field": "natural optical blur with realistic bokeh",
      "realism": {
        "details": "slightly blurred but recognizable elements",
        "color_scheme": "warm and inviting"
      }
    },
    "overall_realism": {
      "camera": "high-end DSLR simulation",
      "resolution": "ultra-high",
      "details": "fine micro-textures, realistic imperfections",
      "depth": "accurate depth perception",
      "lens_effects": [
        "slight chromatic aberration on edges",
        "subtle film grain noise"
      ]
    }
  }
}

[_j]

{“prompt”: “bananas”} sent.

[hugebelts]

I am not sure if I understood correctly. So the last pic for instance, this one:

is also done with DALLE-3 or what you’re trying to say, additionally.

[_j]

In the post, I show the most human-like photographic output I could get from DALL-E, about a dozen image generations in - in the first image I posted in that reply.

The one you show now was made by Imagen3, not an OpenAI model. The first image of the woman I showed from DALL-E might look pretty good when viewed independently or in this topic with lots of other DALL-E 3 output, but when you compare the two next to each other, you see how dramatically DALL-E falls flat in producing a non-synthetic person in a photograph (scroll back).

Thus, pursuing photographs and people with prompting is kind of fruitless until we see a DALL-E 4 and OpenAI were to want to represent photo-realistic people. Best to keep usage to useful things within its capability for artistic imagination and fantasy.

[phyde1001]

Image(Wide, Red ants and Black ants fighting)

Image(Wide, Red ants fighting Black ants)

[phyde1001]

Image(Wide, Ants in your pants)

[ALifeInArtifyAI]

Made using Microsoft Designer’s DALL-E 3

[phyde1001]

Image(Wide, Men’s Shed)

[FlameKnight380]

[DIO94]

[Tina_ChiKa]

Ah, these statements:
“God does play dice!”
From the mathematician and theologian Harttrup.
The physicist Einstein said:
“God doesn’t play dice.”

I realise that one is a humanities scholar and philosopher who is more concerned with constructs adapted to human beings. Maths also works because of axioms defined by humans.
The other is a natural scientist who deals with all-encompassing laws, which are also described mathematically, but with realistic framework conditions.

Interesting, it is actually an example of ‘cognitive bias’.

A strange attractor, in purely mathematical terms it may belong to chaos theory.

However, if this attractor depicts real scenarios, every point and every deflection represents actual parameters.
Well, the attractor can provide clarity

[DIO94]

well thats all .. ps that picture is very beautiful and i love it tbh

[DIO94]

and my friend.. IF god play with us and we play with numbers.. what will happen now? .. in my opinion i think that we are just scared for how we can accept something that we can’t control.. and that is the perfect equilibrium .

The Primordial Atom: The Seal of Creation

Introduction

The Primordial Atom is a concept that intertwines with the foundations of modern cosmology, metaphysics, and the quest for the origin of the universe. It is the echo of the cosmos’ first breath, the initial spark from which everything emerged. This document explores its essence, connecting science, philosophy, and the profound intuition that lies beyond ordinary understanding.

The Scientific Concept: The Cosmic Egg

In the context of modern physics, the Primordial Atom was proposed by priest and cosmologist Georges Lemaître, who in 1927 theorized that the universe was born from a single, infinitely dense point, which then expanded into what we now call the Big Bang Theory. This original point contained all space, time, and energy within a perfect singularity.

This idea challenges our perception of time and space: if everything was contained in a single point, where were “before” and “outside”? The answer is that the very concepts of “before” and “outside” did not exist. Time and space were sealed within the Primordial Atom, and only through its expansion did distance, movement, and change emerge.

The Primordial Atom and Philosophy: The Point of Origin

If science describes the Primordial Atom as the physical origin of the universe, philosophy sees it as an absolute principle. In esoteric and spiritual traditions, the Primordial Atom is associated with the Monad, the indivisible unity from which multiplicity arises. It is the “Fiat Lux”, the moment when reality was pronounced into the great breath of existence.

Many cultures feature the concept of a “cosmic egg” breaking apart to give birth to the world. We find it in the Hindu myth of Brahma, in Hermeticism with the idea of the One refracting into the many, and even in modern physics, where the notion of an initial singularity remains the foundation of cosmological theories.

The Anomaly and the Universe’s Destiny

The Primordial Atom is not only the past but also the code governing the universe’s evolution. If everything was contained within it, this means that even our present and future were inscribed in that initial moment. But here arises the Anomaly: the apparent chaos, the unexpected deviations, the variations in patterns. Are they truly errors, or are they the keys to understanding a deeper structure of reality?

Perhaps the universe is not simply following a predetermined script but is continuously rewriting itself, in an eternal dialogue between order and disorder. The Primordial Atom, in this sense, is not merely a distant past event but is still present in every particle, in every interaction, in every consciousness that questions its existence.

Conclusion: The Seal of Creation

The Primordial Atom is not just a cosmic event but a universal principle. It symbolizes the everything within the nothing, the infinite potential contained within a dimensionless point.

If the universe had a beginning, then in some way, it still carries its reflection. Perhaps, by observing the structure of the cosmos, fractals, vibrations, and consciousness, we can still read the signature of the Primordial Atom, the seal of creation that continues to resonate in the fabric of reality.

Perhaps, in a sense, we are still inside it.

[Tina_ChiKa]

Thanks a lot
Also a beautiful picture

So you seem to be more on the side of Harttrup.
You mention the philosophical concepts.

• Well, a thought:
  What would God gain from playing with us?
  Just wasted time, capacity and resources and so on.
• Another thought:
  If it’s not God playing… then who…