It is far better at reasoning and complex problems then any open model we have seen before.
In terms of api turbo is still faster and generates more accurate results where mistral can wander off on some cases so the extra 20% is worth it in my opinion.
Uh, are there people who don’t have access to the mistral-large-latest API yet?
I only heard about Mistral AI yesterday and was able to use it immediately after creating an account (signing up) and registering my credit card.
I feel sorry, it seems unfair that people are still waiting.
While they may not be as good, they are almost entirely open source, and (probably not anymore since Microsoft partnershiped with them) the new large model could be too.
Many people support Godot over Unity,
But Unity the closed engine will always produce more successful and groundbreaking games then the open engine godot.
I’ve been using Mistral Large to see how my agent prompts would ‘react’ when I inject them into the LLM.
The inferences seem on par with GPT-4 at first sight with I sligthly better ‘understanding’ of the instructions.
No changes needed to be made to existing OpenAI prompts.
I will need to do some more tests, although this Mistral Large models seems very promissing.
Yup, and it was extremely impressive, but not quite as good at the niche tasks I need. (I’m in an industry with relatively little public data)
Agreed that it can be better for some use-cases, but from what I can tell that’s down to how they fine-tuned the model, not because it actually knows more than GPT-4.