I said it can be deleted…
DeepSeek is awesome form what tests I made.
Now I wonder why OpenAI is so expensive:
- as a free user I can use DeepThink.
- as a free user on OpenAI I can’t use Reason or o1 model.
- as a GPT Plus subscriber i have limited prompts for o1 → less than DeepSeek offers for free users… why so greedy?
Even Kai Fu Lee, said 1 year ago “they” would be payed by government just to get data from users ( even if they have to make it free to get the data ) → OpenAI learn nothing… and still greedy when losing with high prices…
The OpenAI library was written in such a way that you can plug in any URL. It’s not exclusively or hard coded for OpenAI. Third-party API providers can run their servers to accept the same structures.
For the text and claim, it’s not surprising. Almost all models use the SOTA model’s (OpenAI) output for their training data
6 Likes
I know how they did it, because I did something similar 1 year ago and I did it better → I could hide everything…
I was thinking they might be building small companies as mini Trojan horses to farm user data.
I don’t know, it is open source, so, the community can see the full code and even there are six distilled versions that you can install and run locally. You don’t have to use its API if you don’t want to. Imho.
3 Likes
Agree, I rarely use the SDK, just go with the direct python requests equivalent, based on their Curl examples.
Reasoning here: At the end of the day, it just hits the endpoint. SDK isn’t needed for basic stuff. It may be needed, however, if doing something more complicated, like streaming.
3 Likes
One other benefit is being able to run multiple models from different providers using (more or less) the same object
4 Likes
The thread can be deleted. Thank you