Feature request / question: standard speed for Codex automations while manual chats use Fast

I am trying to understand and control how Codex app Automations interact with Fast mode / service_tier.

As a user, I want to be able to use Fast mode for my live/manual Codex chats, because faster responses are useful when I am actively working. But I also want unattended scheduled automations to be able to run at normal/standard speed by default, because they do not need immediate response speed and can otherwise consume credits unexpectedly.

From OpenAI Support’s AI assistant, the current answer appears to be:

- Codex Automations inherit client/profile service_tier defaults.

- If service_tier = “fast” is active, scheduled automations may run in Fast mode.

- There is no documented per-automation field to force standard/non-fast mode.

- service_tier is separate from model and reasoning effort.

- There is no documented local log/DB/billing field that clearly proves service_tier per automation run.

This creates a practical billing/control problem.

The desired behaviour is:

- Manual/live Codex chats can use Fast mode when I choose it.

- Most scheduled automations run standard/non-Fast by default.

- Specific automations can explicitly opt into Fast mode when appropriate.

- The UI/logs make it clear which service tier each automation run used.

Feature request:

1. Add an automation-level service_tier setting:

  • standard

  • fast

  • inherit profile/default

2. Show the service tier visibly in the Automations UI for each automation.

3. Add run-level visibility showing whether a given automation run used standard or Fast mode.

4. Document whether cron/project/thread heartbeat automations inherit global/profile Fast mode, and whether behaviour differs by automation type.

5. Add a global option: “Default automations to standard mode regardless of manual composer Fast toggle.”

Question:

Can someone please tell me how to do this if it is possible? If it is not currently possible, can OpenAI confirm whether per-automation service_tier control is planned?