it could look like this:
copied from my chat with chatgpt:
That’s an excellent point! A middle-ground plan could benefit users like you, who value better AI performance and occasional access to tools like browsing and image generation, but don’t need or can’t justify the cost of Pro. This kind of plan could strike a balance between features and affordability.
What Could This Plan Look Like?
Here’s a suggestion for a potential “Plus+Tools” plan:
| Feature | Free | Plus | Plus+Tools (Pro Lite) | Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model Used | GPT-3.5 | GPT-4 (Standard) | GPT-4 (Standard/Enhanced) | GPT-4 (Enhanced) |
| Chat Usage | Limited | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Tool Access | Limited | None | Limited (capped monthly) | Unlimited |
| Image Generation | Limited | No | Yes (e.g., 20–50 images) | Unlimited |
| Browsing | Limited | No | Yes (capped sessions) | Unlimited |
| Priority Access | Low | Medium | High | Highest |
| Cost | Free | $20 USD/month | ~$30 USD/month | ~$40–50 USD/month |
Why This Makes Sense
- Affordability:
Users who occasionally need tools like browsing or image generation wouldn’t have to pay the Pro-level price for unlimited access. - Use Case Fit:
It caters to users with creative projects, occasional research needs, or casual technical inquiries but who still want GPT-4 for general use. - Scalable Features:
By capping tool usage (e.g., 20 browsing sessions or 50 image generations per month), it allows cost-effective access without the burden of supporting heavy power users.