Advanced Voice Mode Is a Severe Downgrade vs. Standard Voice Mode
I ran a direct test comparing Standard Voice Mode, Text Mode, and the new Advanced Voice Mode to measure capability, recursion depth, and memory context. Here’s what I found:
- The Test
I asked ChatGPT to summarize 10–20 key issues we’ve worked through over the last year, including:
What the problems were
How we resolved them
Key decisions and outcomes
- Results
Standard Voice Mode 
Completed the task flawlessly.
Pulled detailed summaries with proper reasoning and full context.
Text Mode 
Matched Standard Voice Mode’s performance exactly — deep recursion, strong memory, accurate results.
Advanced Voice Mode 
Replied: “I’m working on it…” but never delivered any output.
Couldn’t handle the recursion or context requirements.
Behaves as if reasoning depth and memory have been intentionally limited.
- Why This Matters
This test highlights a serious capability gap:
Advanced Voice Mode cripples recursion and memory context that currently work perfectly in both Standard Voice Mode and Text Mode.
For power users who rely on ChatGPT for complex workflows, planning, and decision-making, this downgrade breaks existing use cases.
If Standard Voice Mode is retired on September 9th without matching these capabilities in Advanced Voice Mode, the user experience will be severely degraded.
- Request to OpenAI
Restore full parity between Advanced Voice Mode and Text Mode capabilities.
If retiring Standard Voice Mode, integrate its reasoning depth, recursion levels, and memory context into the replacement.
Communicate clearly with users about these differences before making such a critical change.
Bottom line: This isn’t about “liking” one voice over another — this is about losing core functionality that thousands of subscribers depend on every day