Assitant Stuck Similar response and identical sentences

Hello,

I’m facing an issue where the model produces very similar content across a sequence of emails, despite providing detailed instructions and varying key information in the input. The problem occurs specifically when generating sequences of emails, where each email is intended to have unique subject lines, content, and tone.

The model outputs emails that are nearly identical in wording, structure, and tone across the sequence. I’ve attempted to include specific instructions for variation in each email by using different copywriting frameworks (like AIDA, PAS, etc.), varying the tone, and encouraging more diversity in content. However, the results still lack significant variation between the emails.

How can I approach this?

Is there a way to adjust the prompt or model behavior to create more diverse and dynamic content across an email sequence?

Thank you!

Subject: Re: Query on Prompt Adjustments for Email Sequences

Hi [Colleague’s Name],

I hope this message finds you well.

Best Regards,

In answer to your query about the construction of emails, the chat AI models seem to have an almost form-letter pretraining if you are to mention “email” or other particular destinations for your text, with almost watermark-like recognizability. The key then is to instruct the output composition in general terms, and avoid such a mention.

ChatGPT, or API? In ChatGPT, you don’t have any parameters to adjust, you only have a few different AI models that may behave differently.

I think what you might be encountering is that the more identical prompt and instructions that you also include, the more predicted the output is to go one way, to have one form. 95% instruction vs 5% alteration between instances would certainly make the output more sure of itself in what to produce, unless that 5% switches the intention between “tone: affectionate” or “tone: irritated”. You can try such a word jumble of randomly-selected style and tone words that are supposed to give more alteration than just the communication’s subject. Real random done by code.

In the API, you can increase the temperature above 1.0. This leads to more unexpected wording. Even turn it way up if you constrain the possible words with top_p:0.99. However, that just will produce alternate likely words - the AI is still thinking the same thing, unless a boolean answer early on in composition was switched to the opposite by token selection.

Hi,

I’m encountering an issue where the model generates very similar content throughout an email sequence, even though I’ve provided detailed instructions and changed key details in the input. The problem arises when creating email sequences, where each message is meant to have distinct subject lines, content, and tone.

Despite efforts to introduce variation, the model produces emails that are nearly identical in terms of wording, structure, and overall tone. I’ve tried using different copywriting frameworks (such as AIDA, PAS, etc.), altered the tone, and emphasized the need for diverse content in each email. Unfortunately, there’s still little variation between them.

What adjustments can I make to improve this?

Is there a method to modify the prompt or model behavior to ensure more varied and dynamic content across an email sequence?

Thank you!

Thank you very much. Can you elaborate more so I can understand?
Thanks

I’ll let our new friend o1-mini have a go at doing the elaborating on our prior chat turns, after I loaded it up with more knowledge and ideas to focus on as its background understanding of the symptom.

You can see if AI quickly devolves into a lot of wordy non-answers of no practical use, or if it instead helps clarify some of the background knowledge that I somewhat assume.


Certainly! Let’s delve deeper into why you’re experiencing similar outputs in your email sequences and explore more detailed strategies to introduce variation effectively.

1. Understanding the Root Cause

**a. Pretrained Patterns:

AI language models like ChatGPT are trained on vast datasets that include numerous examples of emails, letters, articles, and other forms of written communication. When you request the model to generate emails, it often taps into these familiar patterns, resulting in responses that follow a “form-letter” structure. This can make different emails in a sequence appear highly similar in terms of structure, phrasing, and tone.

**b. Consistent Prompts:

If your input prompts for each email in the sequence are too similar or share a large portion of their content, the model may prioritize consistency over diversity. This is especially true if the core instructions (like the desired tone, purpose, or structure) remain unchanged across the prompts.

2. Strategies to Introduce Variation

**a. Diversify Your Prompts:

Instead of using nearly identical instructions for each email, try varying the way you phrase your prompts. For example:

  • Email 1 Prompt: “Write a friendly and welcoming introductory email to new subscribers, highlighting our key services.”

  • Email 2 Prompt: “Create an engaging follow-up email with a storytelling approach, showcasing a customer success story.”

  • Email 3 Prompt: “Develop a persuasive email with a sense of urgency, promoting our limited-time offer.”

By altering the focus, style, and objectives of each prompt, you encourage the model to produce more distinct content.

**b. Incorporate Different Copywriting Frameworks:

While you’ve already tried frameworks like AIDA (Attention, Interest, Desire, Action) and PAS (Problem, Agitation, Solution), consider blending elements from multiple frameworks or introducing new ones. For instance:

  • Storytelling Framework: Craft emails that narrate a story related to your product or service.

  • Question-Based Framework: Start with a provocative question to engage the reader.

  • List-Based Framework: Use bullet points or numbered lists to present information clearly.

**c. Specify Varied Tones and Styles:

Explicitly defining different tones for each email can help diversify the content. For example:

  • Email 1: Casual and friendly

  • Email 2: Professional and authoritative

  • Email 3: Inspirational and motivational

By changing the tone, you influence the choice of words, sentence structure, and overall feel of the email.

**d. Introduce Unique Elements:

Incorporate unique elements such as quotes, statistics, or personal anecdotes relevant to each email’s purpose. This adds richness and variety to the content.

3. Utilizing Model Parameters for Variation

If you’re using the OpenAI API, you have greater control over the text generation through parameters. Here’s how you can adjust them to achieve more varied outputs:

**a. Temperature:

  • What It Does: Controls the randomness of the output. Lower values (e.g., 0.2) make the output more deterministic and focused, while higher values (e.g., 0.8) increase creativity and variability.

  • Recommendation: Start with a moderate temperature (around 0.7) to balance coherence and creativity. If the outputs are still too similar, incrementally increase the temperature.

**b. Top_p (Nucleus Sampling):

  • What It Does: Determines the probability mass of the most likely next tokens to consider. For example, a top_p of 0.9 means the model considers the tokens that comprise the top 90% probability.

  • Recommendation: A higher top_p (like 0.95) can introduce more diversity. However, be cautious as too high a value might lead to less coherent text.

**c. Frequency and Presence Penalties:

  • useless bot chatter

Example Configuration:


{

"temperature": 0.8,

"top_p": 0.9,


}

4. Additional Techniques for Enhanced Variation

**a. Use of Templates with Placeholders:

Create different templates for your emails with placeholders for specific content. For example:

  • Template 1: Focused on benefits

  • Template 2: Centered around storytelling

  • Template 3: Highlighting statistics or data

By rotating between these templates, you inherently introduce variety in the structure and content of each email.

**b. Incorporate Randomization Through Code:

If you’re generating multiple emails programmatically (using the API), implement a function that randomly selects different styles, tones, or frameworks for each email. This ensures that each generation is unique and not bound to a single pattern.

**c. Provide Specific and Diverse Instructions:

The more specific and varied your instructions are for each email, the better the model can tailor its responses. For instance, instead of saying “Write the second email in the sequence,” specify the unique goal and approach for that email.

**d. Review and Revise Generated Content:

Sometimes, post-processing the AI-generated content can help in adding the final touches that enhance uniqueness. This could involve rephrasing certain sections, adding personalized details, or adjusting the flow to better suit your audience.

5. Avoiding Over-Specification

While it’s essential to provide clear instructions, over-specifying every detail can sometimes restrict the model’s ability to generate creative variations. Striking a balance between guidance and creative freedom allows the AI to produce content that’s both relevant and diverse.

6. Testing and Iteration

Finally, it’s crucial to experiment with different settings and approaches:

  • A/B Testing: Generate multiple versions using varying parameters and assess which ones perform better.

  • Feedback Loops: Incorporate feedback based on recipient responses to continuously refine your email generation strategy.

  • Iteration: Continuously tweak prompts and parameters based on observed outcomes to achieve the desired level of variation.

Conclusion

Generating a diverse set of emails requires a combination of thoughtful prompt engineering, parameter tuning (if using the API), and strategic content planning. By understanding the underlying causes of similarity and applying the strategies outlined above, you can enhance the uniqueness and effectiveness of your email sequences.