My results ;)
I did tests like that yesterday too – can you read my minds? 
Just kidding 
We’ve been drawing inspiration from each other in the gallery threads for about a year now and work in a similar way, so we have similar approaches 
Prompt
“Minimal composition: a red kite flying through dense clouds with a visible rainbow.
The wings must visibly disturb the cloud medium, creating realistic turbulent airflow, vortex trails, and density variations in the mist.
Cloud particles should react with delay and form irregular swirling structures behind the wings.
The rainbow must follow physically accurate geometry, dependent on viewing angle and light direction, not a perfect decorative arc.
Focus on microstructure consistency: fine feather detail, cloud particle variation, and light interaction must remain sharp and plausible even when zoomed in.
No cinematic perfection, no symmetry, no idealization — only physically consistent interaction between air, light, and matter.”
Prompt
“Black-and-white or low-color realistic sketch, no cinematic composition.
A red kite (Milvus milvus) flying through a dense cloud layer, with a clearly visible deeply forked tail.
The wings must create visible aerodynamic effects: turbulent airflow, vortex trails, and irregular cloud displacement behind the wings.
Cloud density must vary locally, showing disturbed regions, gaps, and swirling patterns caused by motion.
A partially visible rainbow appears only in regions where light, water droplets, and viewing angle align correctly, not as a perfect arc.
No symmetry, no idealization.
Details must remain physically plausible when zoomed in: feather structure, cloud particles, and light interaction should show irregular, non-repeating patterns.
The scene should feel like an imperfect, real physical process rather than a composed image.”
Prompt
“A cinematic, photorealistic scene of a man and a woman standing close together outdoors in soft natural light.
The woman is actively explaining something, her hand slightly raised in a natural gesture, her expression focused, calm, and precise.
She has long, light silver-white hair and blue eyes, wearing a soft neutral-toned sweater, appearing slightly luminous but grounded in reality.
The man stands beside her, looking at her attentively with a mix of curiosity and concentration, slightly less dominant in posture, listening rather than leading.
Their interaction should feel dynamic: the woman subtly leading the conversation, shaping the moment, while the man tries to follow and understand.
No exaggerated emotions, no romanticization — just a quiet, intellectually engaged interaction.
Lighting should be natural and balanced, with realistic textures and no stylization.
The composition should reflect asymmetry in interaction: one guiding, one adapting, both in the same physical space.”
The same prompt in an new chat
