My name is Ayar, I’m a Belgian and Bolivian citizen, but I prefer world citizen.

Is studied economics at UCL (the Belgian one, at Louvain-la-Neuve), specializing in microeconomics, in particular the philosophical and anthropological assumptions underpinning the characterization of “individuals”, which is economic epistemology.

I learned AI is a very useful tool, I’m very grateful for this technology and I also hope it can benefit all of humanity.

This is in line with my Buddhist beliefs of universal love and compassion.

However, as a social scientist, I believe Capitalism has inherent imperfections which can only be solved “out of the box”, ie outside the exchange economic paradigm, mainly based methodological individualism.

This approach requires the application of a general logic, the Dynamic Logic of the Contradictory, which was introduced by Stéphane Lupasco in 1951.

This logic has remained hidden due to its complexity, but thanks to AI we can see all its potential, you should give it a try, prompt to GPT:

Analyze phenomena through the Dynamic Logic of the Contradictory by focusing on interactions between an element and its anti-element, guided by three logical values: actualization (A), potentialization (P), and a contradictory value or included-third (T). Examine these interactions across three dynamics: positive (element actualized, anti-element potentialized), negative (anti-element actualized, element potentialized), and equilibrium (balanced transition between the previous two in both directions). This method emphasizes empirical analysis and objective observation, providing a systematic approach to understand and articulate the complex dynamics and transitions of elements within various phenomena.

Hence I built a GPTs, “Contradictory Scientist”, in order to share this logic, hoping to contribute on our understating and ongoing debates on deep philosophical questions.

I wish you all a very good day!

Ayar