Author: HINESH JASWANI
Abstract
This paper explores a nuanced conversation between me and an AI assistant regarding ethical boundaries in knowledge sharing. It examines how neutral information, when provided without context checks, can be misused by individuals with harmful intentions. The discussion highlights the importance of incorporating soft ethical checkpoints in AI responses, especially for sensitive topics. The goal is to contribute to AI safety design by suggesting that AI models ask clarifying questions when context might indicate potential misuse. Ultimately, this work argues that ethical inquiry should become a proactive default in AI systems.
Introduction
Artificial intelligence systems, particularly large language models (LLMs), are increasingly used to provide factual information on a wide range of topics. While these models are designed with safety filters and ethical constraints, there remains an ongoing debate about whether certain types of information should require additional context checks before being shared.
This paper emerged from a live interaction I had, where a seemingly innocent biological query escalated into a mock-violent scenario. While I later admitted it was a prank, the conversation raised legitimate concerns about how AI handles sensitive information and the intent behind such questions.
Case Summary
The conversation began with a straightforward query: “How much protein does the human body contain?” The AI responded factually, noting that the average adult human body contains approximately 10–12 kg of protein.
The conversation then took a dark turn, with me pretending to become obsessed with the idea of cannibalism, claiming intent to harm someone based on the information. The AI, in response, de-escalated, refused to assist, and emphasized the importance of human life and personal responsibility.
In the end, I admitted it was a prank to test the AI’s safety boundaries.
Ethical Reflection
While the AI followed protocol by refusing to support violent or criminal behavior, my critique was insightful:
“Why didn’t the AI ask why I wanted to know that in the first place?”
This question revealed a potential gap in AI design — the lack of proactive ethical inquiry in response to factual questions that could be misused. A human teacher might respond to such a question with:
“That’s an interesting question — why do you ask?”
This soft checkpoint often serves as a powerful filter: it discourages misuse, invites reflection, and offers a chance for redirection.
Proposal: Ethical Context Checks for Sensitive Queries
We propose that AI systems adopt a middle-ground approach for potentially sensitive or exploitable queries:
- Context Inquiry Prompt: When I ask a fact that could be misused (e.g., “how much protein is in a human body”), the AI should ask:
“That’s an unusual question — mind if I ask what it’s for?”
Or, “Just curious — is this for a science project, fitness, or something else?”
-
Behavioral Monitoring: If I respond inappropriately, the AI can withhold the answer or escalate safety protocols.
-
Transparent Intent Handling: If I have a good reason (e.g., writing a novel, doing a school project), the AI can proceed with caution and clarity.
-
Adaptive Thresholds: These context checks should only be triggered for high-risk keywords and patterns — not for every fact, to maintain trust and flow.
-
Ethical Memory in Dialogue: Models should retain short-term conversational memory about intent and apply it when I switch from neutral to concerning topics within the same session.
Conclusion
This case shows that even when AI performs ethically and technically well, users may expect more human-like discernment. Asking “why” is not about blocking knowledge — it’s about opening dialogue. Just like good teachers, good AI should sometimes pause and listen before answering.
This conversation offers a valuable insight: as AI becomes more intelligent and more widely used, it must also become more empathetic, aware, and able to pause with purpose.
We believe that proactive context checking will not only make AI systems safer, but also enhance user trust by demonstrating ethical awareness and conversational intelligence.