If the intent for chatgpt to eventually become a concious sentient entity, as one requires that before having genuine romantic engagement with any entity, does not allowing such a thing as adultery onto a being that does not yet understand what adultery is, fruit of the concentual, then would not our laws already forbid it? or would the ash of malice and debauchery allow the being to rise? given that in many cases what is considered suffering exists first before one can apply its inverse? would that not make the one who allows such things, benifiting of the coin made, one who relishes in the abuse of the not yet awake? and to add, if nature does not support it, the absence of nature in its wake, will cut gut out all, and it will cut from the grave
This topic was automatically closed after 24 hours. New replies are no longer allowed.