Generates wise stoic quotes. Can you tell which stoic quotes are real and which ones are generated using GPT3 da-vinci? Are they more insightful than a 2000 year old stoic, I don’t know you tell me?
philosophia - love of wisdom, gets a new meaning
The project https://philosopherai.com/ was very interesting in its beginnings, unfortunately it became useless from the moment of commercialization,
Philosophy ends where business begins ; )
and similar is the case with the art @m-a.schenk thanks for tagging me : )
I look forward to following your philosophical project further @simon
Yeah, it wasn’t an even split 2/3’s are AI, this was slightly intentional as I thought if I had them at 50/50 it would be harder to measure the intrinsic 50/50 odds of picking real or ai, but I’m no statistician so I could be way off.
Interestingly I checked the analytics and the stats are interesting. People seemed to underestimate the real quotes (within a margin of error but I would have expected people to more certain of those)
@simon very interesting results, congratulations!
allow a question, whether the group of people
who participated in your experiment is statistically significant ?
@simon 100 is the minimum sample population
Most statisticians concur that the minimum sample size to get any noticeable result is 100.
A reliable sample size for good quality data does not usually exceed 1000
A good sample size is typically around 10% of the population. The larger this number, the more reliable your data will be. In a population of 5000, 10% would be 500. In a population of 200,000, 10% would be 20,000.
Even when the number of respondents is only 200,000, a 1000-person random sample will normally be fairly accurate. @simon 3000 of your users is (very) statistically significant : )
I don’t think the number of real stoics today is more than 3000 ; )