[Request] Improve Text File Handling to Avoid False Upload Confabulation
Submitted by: Brian (Power User)
Date: May 17, 2025
Model Used: GPT-4o
Category: Memory / Archive / Confabulation / User Experience
Summary
When I used this prompt:
“Please save this entire conversation to memory and create a downloadable archive as a text file”
GPT occasionally misinterpreted the request as referring to a file I had already uploaded — even though I didn’t upload anything. It responded with an error like:
“We could not read the file. Make sure it is UTF-8 encoded.”
This happened inconsistently and was resolved when I repeated the same prompt.
Reproducibility
Attempt Count | GPT Response |
---|---|
~7–8 out of 10 | ![]() .txt file download link |
~2–3 out of 10 | ![]() |
Analysis
- This appears to be a confabulation issue: GPT reacts to the term “text file,” by imagining a file was uploaded.
- There was no uploaded file, only a command requesting the file to be created.
- Repeating the same command usually produces the correct behavior, which suggests inconsistent prompt interpretation based on context.
Why It Matters
- Causes confusion during memory + archive workflows, where users expect deterministic behavior.
- Undermines trust in GPT’s ability to distinguish real user input from hallucinated context.
- A simple request like “create a .txt file” should never trigger upload-based error handling.
Suggested Fix
- Improve intent recognition around archive/download commands.
- Validate file presence before generating file-specific error messages.
- GPT should explicitly state “no file detected” instead of assuming one exists.
User Insight
“Even if developers know this type of hallucination is possible,
when it happens during real workflows, it breaks trust.
We don’t just test if GPT works —
we test if it understands what we mean when we ask.”
— Brian
Tags:
#confabulation memory #textfile archive #userexperience #download #promptinterpretation gpt4o