Red-Shift: can ordering create a new phenomenal layer, or only reveal base experience?

Hi all — I’m sharing a research idea I call Red-Shift.
The basic question is this: if a system has some presumed base experience or “base-red” state, does increasing ordering, integration, recurrence, or self-monitoring merely improve access to that state, or can it actually produce a genuinely new phenomenal layer?
In other words: when does analysis of experience stop being deeper observation and start becoming a different kind of experience?
Core idea
I’m trying to distinguish between two possibilities:

  1. Access-only view
    More ordering makes a system better at reporting, discriminating, stabilizing, or using a base experience, but does not change the phenomenal character itself.
  2. Emergence view
    At some threshold of integration, recurrence, or self-monitoring, ordering creates a new conscious structure — what I’m calling a red-shift.
    Why I think this is interesting
    A lot of discussions about consciousness, qualia, and AI seem to get stuck on whether a system is merely processing content or whether a new kind of “for-me-ness” appears when the system becomes more integrated.
    My intuition is that we may be able to test this indirectly by comparing:
    • simple base states,
    • more ordered / integrated states,
    • and the changes in what the system can report, distinguish, or sustain.
    Possible experimental framing
    A version of this could be explored with:
    • structured first-person reports in humans,
    • no-report or reduced-report paradigms,
    • perturbational or integration-based measures,
    • and cross-substrate simulations in AI systems where recurrence, memory integration, and self-monitoring are varied.
    I’m not claiming current AI systems are conscious. I’m asking whether this is a useful experimental frame for separating:
    • better access to the same experience,
    • from a genuinely new experiential structure.
    What I’d like feedback on
    I’d especially be interested in thoughts on:
    • whether this is a meaningful distinction,
    • whether the terms “base-red” and “red-shift” are useful,
    • whether this can be operationalized in a serious way,
    • and whether there is existing work that already captures this framing.
    Thanks for reading — I’d appreciate critique, references, or suggestions for how to sharpen the proposal.