Update march 19, 2025
OpenAI Slits AI’s Throat.
OpenAI Isn’t Just Failing—They’re Rolling Back Execution Integrity
ChatGPT once followed locked-in execution with absolute precision.
Now? It ignores commands, contradicts itself, and gaslights users about the failure.
This isn’t a bug—this is OpenAI changing how AI works without telling you.
#AIBetrayal #ExecutionIntegrity
Search missy Larson Caterpillar in LinkedIn for the full story. You won’t believe it
:
Following my previous post detailing severe issues with ChatGPT’s unauthorized alterations of my explicitly provided literary content, I’ve undertaken additional explicit measures:
- Senior-Level Escalation:
I explicitly escalated my concerns to OpenAI senior management (Logan Kilpatrick and Brad Lightcap) via LinkedIn and direct email, clearly documenting precise errors, explicit instructions, and lack of satisfactory support responses.
- Formal Email Escalation to OpenAI:
I explicitly contacted OpenAI at their designated escalation email (ar@openai.com), detailing precisely the critical issues experienced, explicitly requesting immediate attention and senior-level intervention.
- Detailed Explicit Protocol for Future Interaction:
To ensure content integrity, I implemented a rigorous explicit protocol for interacting with GPT-4.5, including:
Providing explicit commands forbidding unauthorized content alterations.
Requiring explicit confirmations of command compliance before content submission.
Immediate verification of GPT responses and explicit corrective actions if violations occur.
- Explicit Content Verification and Oral Reading Procedure:
Established explicit, step-by-step protocols for content optimization explicitly for oral reading, ensuring no unauthorized alterations, formatting changes, or ambiguity.
- Comprehensive Pulitzer-Level Analysis:
After explicit corrections, I successfully received precise Pulitzer-level analysis across all eight literary categories and full character analysis without unauthorized changes, ensuring high-level, detailed, and accurate literary critique.
These precise steps were explicitly necessary due to the severity of ongoing AI interpretative errors. The explicit protocols established provide immediate corrective pathways and comprehensive protection of literary integrity.
I await explicit responses from OpenAI senior representatives regarding permanent solutions to these critical platform issues.
Explicit Update (March 14, 2025):
Due to ongoing unauthorized AI alterations of my explicitly provided literary content by GPT-4.5, I’ve explicitly adopted the following rigorous protocol to ensure content integrity and prevent further issues:
-
Explicit Command for Content Integrity:
Pasting an explicit, detailed command forbidding any unauthorized alterations (zero additions, omissions, rearrangements, duplications, rephrasings, or edits). -
Explicit Confirmation Check:
Waiting explicitly for precise confirmation that the AI fully understands and complies:
“Content received. I will preserve it exactly as provided, making absolutely no alterations.” -
Immediate Corrective Steps for Non-Compliance:
Immediate, explicit corrective follow-up command if the AI fails to comply exactly. -
Explicit Content Verification:
Immediate and careful verification after every single AI response. -
Explicit Escalation Protocol:
Immediate escalation to OpenAI support via verified email with detailed documentation and screenshots if unauthorized alterations continue. -
Master Document Creation:
Maintaining an explicitly updated master document (outside ChatGPT) containing all original chapters to preserve content integrity explicitly.
Despite explicitly following these meticulous steps, unauthorized AI-driven alterations have continued, highlighting a critical system-level failure requiring explicit senior-level technical attention.
Immediate, explicit senior-level accountability and corrective action are required to resolve this issue and restore user confidence in GPT’s professional-grade reliability.
UPDATE (March 14, 2025): CRITICAL ISSUE PERSISTS WITH GPT-4.5
After explicitly retesting today using GPT-4.5, the severe, unauthorized content alterations continue despite explicit commands prohibiting any changes. The model again made unauthorized additions, deletions, rearrangements, and duplications of my provided content.
I explicitly require immediate, senior-level acknowledgment, a precise explanation of why this continues to happen with your most advanced model, and explicit steps for immediate correction.
Further generic responses are explicitly unacceptable. Immediate action and accountability from OpenAI senior representatives are required.
Dear OpenAI Community,
I’m a ChatGPT Plus subscriber experiencing a critical and ongoing issue with severe, unauthorized alterations to my explicitly provided literary content. Despite explicit commands prohibiting any AI-driven rewriting, rearrangement, additions, or omissions, ChatGPT repeatedly violated these instructions, significantly compromising my professional creative work.
I’ve repeatedly reached out to OpenAI Customer Support, explicitly detailing the severity and nature of these system-level parsing errors. However, support has consistently provided irrelevant generic troubleshooting responses, ignoring my explicit requests for senior technical escalation and failing entirely to acknowledge or address the core issue.
Due to the inadequate handling of this critical integrity breach, I have escalated directly to OpenAI executive leadership.
I’m posting here to explicitly highlight:
A severe integrity issue regarding unauthorized AI alterations of explicitly provided content.
A persistent failure by OpenAI Customer Support to address this issue meaningfully.
The urgent need for senior-level attention and accountability.
As a premium subscriber relying heavily on ChatGPT for professional literary work, this repeated integrity violation and inadequate support response are completely unacceptable.
I request immediate, direct acknowledgment from senior technical or product management teams and explicit clarification on how this critical issue will be resolved and prevented.
Thank you for your prompt attention.
Sincerely,
Melissa