Hi Olga,
Thank you for the feedback. I’m truly touched by your response, while this article was purely from the business and engineering standpoint and only scratches the tip of the iceberg, you pointed out the rest of the beast… Especially when you know that this article basis was my vision of neural networks and LLMs in particular:
- they are just an artificial equivalent of a biological acquired reflex, pushed to its limits per say, but I suspect those limits are more defined by our own perception as humans.
The marketing of AI the great job explaining the potential, the issue I see many business owners and surprisingly many developers took that for acquired reality. Maybe because they were just not ready to understand the difference between the dream they were sold and the current state of the things.
I do agree not only engineers should think about that. And areas like yours even more important than engineering.
My attempt this article was to kind of reset the understanding and help at least engineers to get ready for what is coming. After reading this article couple of times I do see I may still a lot of points so anyone who reads this feel free to add items or raise questions.
@Sleep_status , feel free to check my older posts I bet you might find something interesting for you.
Here is one link in particular which you are definitely qualified to understand in full: RAG is not really a solution - #103 by sergeliatko
You might also search for: FLASH concept I mentioned a couple of years ago in this forum. Let me know what you think about that concept. I’m really curious. I’ll post a link here if I’ll find it. (Found it: Preparing data for embedding - #24 by sergeliatko )
As for people who are turning towards AI for emotional comfort, that is very dangerous (again that subject had my proud 5 cents in it). And I don’t think we are ready to deal with this. Hope it will not end up as opium a couple of centuries ago.