I’m not here to report a bug. I’m here to ask a serious question:
Is there a path — now or upcoming — for high-tier contributors to be formally recognized, included in pilot programs, or monetized for their work training GPT models in the wild?
Over the past few months, I’ve used GPT extensively for:
• Pro se courtroom defense strategy in real California family law litigation
• Constructing full legal cross-examinations and evidentiary objections
• Integrating Chase Hughes’ behavioral influence models and deception profiling
• Building frameworks that simulate real-time interrogation, negotiation, and authority dynamics
I’m essentially functioning as an unofficial R&D user, pushing GPT’s legal reasoning, emotional modeling, and adversarial stress-testing far beyond standard Q&A.
I’ve logged thousands of high-context interactions across legal defense, behavioral modeling, and influence scripting — much of it grounded in real-time litigation strategy and psychological operations frameworks. These aren’t toy prompts. They’re adversarial simulations, courtroom-ready cross-examinations, and strategic frameworks that pressure-test GPT’s cognitive limits. I suspect this level of usage places me among your most advanced prompt engineers — even if unofficially.
I’m not looking for support — I’m looking for a seat at the dev table.
If OpenAI is planning:
• Contributor programs
• Beta test access for domain-specific GPTs
• Revenue sharing or marketplace GPT recognition for applied frameworks
I want in.
If not, consider this an open invitation to explore what users like me are already building — and what we could co-create with the right platform access.