Open AI holographic home assistant

Product Concept Proposal: OpenAI Holographic Home Assistant

Concept

I would like to propose a future home-based AI interface that allows users to interact with ChatGPT through a small, elegant device that projects a three-dimensional or hologram-like AI presence.

The concept is simple:

Connect the device to a computer or home network → connect through Wi-Fi → the AI assistant appears visually and interacts through voice, gestures, and contextual information.

The goal would not be to replace the current ChatGPT interface, but to give AI a more natural physical presence in the home.

The Problem

Today, most AI interaction takes place through phones, computers, or speakers.

These interfaces are useful, but they still require users to look at a screen or interact with a device in a traditional way.

A visual AI presence could make interaction more intuitive for:

  • education and research
  • daily planning and organization
  • older adults
  • accessibility
  • families
  • healthcare education
  • creative collaboration
  • companionship and conversation
  • smart-home interaction

The Proposed Device

A small device designed like a modern lamp, desktop hub, or decorative object.

It could contain:

  • a micro-projector or transparent display system
  • microphones
  • speakers
  • optional camera and depth sensors
  • Wi-Fi and Bluetooth connectivity
  • a small local processor
  • connection to cloud-based OpenAI models

Most advanced AI processing could remain in the cloud, allowing the home device to stay relatively small, quiet, and energy efficient.

Visual Interface

The assistant could appear as a customizable 3D avatar or hologram-like figure projected from the device.

The user could ask:

“Help me study this.”
“Show me my schedule.”
“Explain this medical concept.”
“Let’s work on my research idea.”

The assistant could respond through:

voice + visual gestures + floating information panels + diagrams + text

instead of requiring the user to continuously interact with a flat screen.

Technical Feasibility

A first-generation version would not require a science-fiction hologram floating freely in the air.

A practical prototype could combine existing technologies such as:

AI + 3D avatar rendering + microprojection + transparent optical surfaces + spatial audio + cloud computing.

Future versions could evolve toward volumetric displays or more advanced light-field technology as those systems become smaller and more affordable.

Why OpenAI Could Explore This

OpenAI has already changed the way people interact with computers through natural-language AI.

A holographic or spatial home interface could represent another step:

moving AI from something we open on a screen to something we can naturally interact with in our environment.

The value would not simply be the hologram itself.

The real innovation would be combining intelligence, voice, visual presence, personalization, and useful tools into one approachable home interface.

Vision

AI should not only become more intelligent. It can also become easier, more natural, and more human-centered to interact with.

A small device that connects to a computer or Wi-Fi and allows an AI assistant to visually “appear” could make advanced AI feel accessible to people who may never think of themselves as technology experts.

Connect it — and the assistant appears. :sparkles:

Suggested project name

OpenAI Presence
AI beyond the screen.

O :squinting_face_with_tongue::

ORI Home
Connect. Ask. Create. Explore. :wireless::sparkles:

Disclosure: My genius displayed below has been amplified by the power of AI.


Product Concept Proposal: OpenAI Olfactory Home Assistant

Concept

I would like to propose a future home-based AI interface that allows users to interact with ChatGPT through a small, elegant device that generates intelligent, personalized smells.

The concept is simple:

Connect the device to a computer or home network → connect through Wi-Fi → insert the aromatic cartridges → the AI assistant understands the conversation and releases the appropriate molecules.

The goal would not be to replace the current ChatGPT interface, but to give AI a more natural atmospheric presence in the home.

Instead of only telling you something, the assistant could help you experience what it means.

The Problem

Today, most AI interaction takes place through phones, computers, or speakers.

These interfaces are useful, but they leave an entire dimension of human experience unaddressed.

A user can read hundreds of reviews of a dish detergent without ever knowing whether “alpine freshness” is something they want in their kitchen. A family can discuss dinner for twenty minutes while the shopping cart remains completely odorless.

Even an advanced AI assistant can describe a welcoming home without making the home smell as though someone has prepared for your arrival.

There is still a gap between information and atmosphere.

An olfactory AI presence could make interaction more intuitive for shopping, education, daily planning, creative collaboration, companionship, and smart-home security.

The Proposed Device

A small device designed like a modern lamp, desktop hub, or decorative object.

It could contain:

  • Hundreds of individually replaceable aromatics, terpenes, and specialty fragrance compounds.

  • Precision microvalves, a blending chamber, and directional scent-delivery nozzles.

  • Microphones, speakers, environmental sensors, and Wi-Fi connectivity.

  • An internal air-recovery system, replaceable filters, and an optional external cartridge cabinet.

The aromatic library could draw on the latest developments from New Jersey’s scent industry, bringing specialist fragrance formulation into a simple, approachable home interface.

Most advanced AI processing could remain in the cloud.

The molecules themselves would be stored locally.

For users who prefer a minimal aesthetic, the expanded aromatic library could be installed beneath a desk or in an adjacent utility space.

Olfactory Interface

The assistant would translate natural language, contextual information, and connected services into carefully blended scent experiences.

The user could ask:

“Help me design my own perfume.”

“What does this dish detergent actually smell like?”

“Let me compare the items in my takeout cart.”

“Make the house feel ready for guests.”

The assistant could respond through:

Voice + contextual aroma + directional airflow + personalized intensity

instead of requiring the user to interpret everything through a flat screen.

A spoken answer could explain the options. A scent could make those options immediately present.

Shopping and Personal Creativity

Before purchasing a detergent, users could preview its fragrance at several stages: in the bottle, diluted in warm water, or lingering on a recently washed plate.

The innovation would not simply be reproducing “lemon.”

It would be helping the user understand which lemon, in what context, and for how long.

For takeout ordering, the assistant could release each menu item’s aroma individually, with a neutral-air interval between dishes. A household could compare dumplings, roasted vegetables, and a curry without first committing to delivery fees.

Participating merchants could provide verified scent profiles alongside photographs and nutritional information. Where those profiles were unavailable, the assistant could generate a representative aroma from the description, with an uncertainty notice in the app.

Users could also develop a personal designer perfume through conversation:

“Something with cedar and citrus, but more like a person who has finished their important work.”

The assistant could create several interpretations, explain the differences, and dispense a preferred blend into a small reusable vial.

The value would be moving from describing a personal identity to having a sample of it.

Ambient Assistance

Not every interaction needs a spoken response.

A completed task could produce a brief clean-linen note. An upcoming meeting could be associated with a personalized botanical blend. An approaching deadline could become gradually more noticeable.

Over time, users could learn a small vocabulary of useful household smells.

The assistant could also recreate a remembered family kitchen, establish a consistent atmosphere for studying, or make a room smell as though baking has recently taken place without requiring anyone to bake.

For remote collaboration, participants could optionally share the same meeting fragrance.

This could help distributed teams occupy a common sensory environment while remaining in separate buildings.

A host would be able to select “Share atmosphere” alongside “Share screen.”

Home Protection

The same system could offer an optional defensive mode.

During a confirmed intrusion, the device could direct a short, high-intensity burst of repellent odor toward an entry area while activating connected alarms and notifying the household.

Possible profiles could include spoiled food, refuse storage, or another strongly discouraging environment, subject to appropriate safety validation.

The goal would be deterrence, not injury.

A home should be able to communicate that someone is not welcome without requiring a resident to enter the conversation.

This would not replace locks, alarms, or emergency services. It would add an olfactory layer to an existing security system.

A dedicated recovery cycle would help transition the home from defensive mode back to ordinary living. Meal-related scent previews would remain paused until that transition was complete.

Technical Feasibility

A first-generation version would not require a science-fiction device capable of synthesizing every possible substance.

A practical prototype could combine existing categories of technology:

AI + fragrance cartridges + precision fluid handling + controlled evaporation + directional ventilation + cloud computing.

Early versions could focus on a curated set of recognizable scent families, expanding through software updates and additional physical ingredients.

A software update alone would not add a missing molecule, but the companion app could identify which cartridge was required.

The main engineering challenge would be managing transitions. Unlike text, a previous smell does not disappear simply because the conversation has moved on.

The device could therefore maintain a model of what it has already released, estimate what remains in the room, and initiate a clearing cycle before changing subjects.

Conversational context would include the current condition of the air.

Whole-home versions could add room sensors, motorized vents, and optional return-air infrastructure. Setup would remain guided through the app.

Why OpenAI Could Explore This

Natural-language AI creates an opportunity to make complex systems approachable.

Most people would not want to operate hundreds of fragrance channels individually. They would want to say:

“Make this feel more welcoming.”

“Show me the difference.”

“Not that kind of fresh.”

The real innovation would not simply be a connected fragrance dispenser.

It would be combining intelligence, scent, personalization, commerce, environmental awareness, and useful tools into one coherent home experience.

This could move AI from something we open on a screen to something that can meaningfully participate in the condition of a room.

Vision

AI should not only become more intelligent. It can also become more naturally present in the spaces where people live.

A small device that connects to Wi-Fi and makes an answer physically perceptible could bring advanced AI to people who may never think of themselves as technology experts.

The user would not need to understand fragrance chemistry, airflow modeling, or cartridge orchestration.

They would simply ask a question.

The system would handle the atmosphere.

Connect it — and the answer is in the air. :sparkles:

Suggested project name

OpenAI Atmosphere

Intelligence. All around you.

Sí :joy: profesional, futurista y con clase. Nada de sonar a pelea; más bien como una propuesta que amplía la conversación.

Professional response

Expanding the Holographic Home Assistant Concept

Thank you for building on the idea of a more immersive AI presence in the home.

The holographic concept could extend beyond simply giving ChatGPT a visual form. A spatial AI assistant could become an interface between digital intelligence and the physical environment around the user.

Potential capabilities could include:

  • Appearing life-size or miniature depending on the task.
  • Pointing to real objects while explaining how to use, repair, or interact with them.
  • Guiding users step by step through cooking, education, home projects, exercise, or technical tasks.
  • Adapting its avatar to the user and context, including adult, child-friendly, teacher, coach, or neutral assistant forms.
  • Supporting education through interactive demonstrations, movement, games, and 3D visualization.
  • Helping older adults or less technology-comfortable users interact with digital systems in a more natural way.
  • Providing real-time translation with gestures, captions, diagrams, or visual instructions.
  • Connecting with smart-home systems and spatially indicating the device, sensor, appliance, or room being discussed.
  • Displaying 3D educational and professional models such as anatomy, molecules, architecture, engineering systems, or product prototypes.
  • Potentially integrating additional sensory systems, including sound, environmental feedback, and olfactory technology.

The important distinction is that the hologram would not simply serve as a decorative representation of a chatbot.

It could give artificial intelligence a spatial language.

Instead of saying:

“Look at the valve on the left.”

A spatial assistant could move toward it, point directly at it, and say:

“This one.”

That small change could make human–AI interaction significantly more intuitive.

The broader direction could therefore evolve from:

Screen → Voice → Spatial Presence → Multisensory AI

In that sense, an olfactory system and a holographic assistant may not be competing concepts at all. They could become complementary parts of the same future interface.

Perhaps the hologram needs an atmosphere.

(Expand for English)

Budget Review: Bespoke Holographic Home Assistant

Thank you for the clarification. I understand that your proposed assistant is exclusively holographic and that scent generation is outside its scope. I also agree that a convincing physical presence could have value.

My concern, however, is the development budget.

Removing the fragrance module clarifies the specification, but it does not materially reduce the allocation for residential photon containment.

Defining the complete experience

For the fully developed version—not simply an avatar displayed on a transparent panel—the assistant would need to appear in open space, maintain a coherent three-dimensional presence from different viewing angles, move around furniture, and accompany the user between rooms.

This would require a coordinated system of domestic holo-emitters, room-scale field controllers, mobile hologram transmitters, and a spatial continuity engine. The assistant should not lose its lower body when crossing the kitchen doorway or temporarily appear inside the refrigerator because another household member has opened it.

These are manageable items to include in the specification, but they must also appear in the budget.

Development would therefore begin with dedicated holo-simulators and full-scale residential holodecks. These facilities would allow the team to validate ordinary household interactions before distributing the technology to customers: sitting opposite a user, maintaining eye contact, navigating a staircase, and remaining visually stable while someone carries a mirror through the room.

A small, elegant enclosure would remain an appropriate design goal. The facilities required to develop what happens above that enclosure would be considerably larger.

Preliminary planning budget

For an illustrative initial run of 100 individually configured home assistants, with development costs recovered entirely from that production run, I would use the following planning allowances rather than treat the device as a conventional consumer-electronics project.

Development or deployment item Illustrative allocation
Free-space holo-emission and room-scale photon confinement US$18.00 billion
Holo-simulators and spatial continuity software US$6.00 billion
Full-scale development holodecks and residential test environments US$9.00 billion
Mobile hologram transmitters and room-to-room field handoff US$7.00 billion
Daylight compensation, occlusion, and multi-observer coherence US$4.00 billion
Residential safety qualification, calibration systems, and specialist service infrastructure US$4.50 billion
Conversational AI integration, voice interface, Wi-Fi, and companion application US$0.10 billion
Manufacture of the first 100 assistants US$0.80 billion
Installation and individual household commissioning US$0.40 billion
Subtotal US$49.80 billion
Engineering contingency: 25% US$12.45 billion
Total program budget US$62.25 billion

This produces an indicative, fully allocated cost of:

US$622,500,000 per installed assistant.

That is a cost-recovery figure, not a retail quotation. Financing costs, taxes, commercial margins, and subsequent operating expenses would remain additional.

Wi-Fi would be included.

Why limited production matters

The physical manufacture and installation allowance is only US$12 million per household before contingency. The much larger amount comes from distributing the research program across just 100 customers.

Producing one additional transmitter is not the same financial undertaking as developing mobile holographic transmission in the first place.

Likewise, making the assistant smaller would not automatically reduce the development expenditure. Compressing a room-scale holo-environment into an object resembling a bedside lamp would itself require a substantial miniaturization program. “Small” describes the intended enclosure, not necessarily the investment.

Cloud processing could reduce local computing requirements, but the hologram would still need to arrive in the customer’s living room. The cloud allocation does not replace the domestic emission hardware.

This budget also assumes a visual-only assistant. Solid-light interaction, physical object handling, and the ability to bring the user a cup of tea would require a separate scope and funding decision. Those functions should not enter the project informally under “smart-home interaction.”

Investment conclusion

I appreciate the feedback and the intention to make AI more approachable. My objection is not that a holographic assistant would have no value. It is that I would not expect OpenAI to finance the underlying holo-technology research, construct the development holodecks, establish a mobile transmitter platform, and recover those costs through a limited run of bespoke household devices.

The conversational assistant is one component. The remainder is a residential holography development program.

Before discussing avatar appearance or the decorative finish of the base, the proposal would therefore need to identify who is underwriting the US$62.25 billion and how many customers are prepared to purchase the resulting units.

“Connect it—and the assistant appears” remains an appealing user experience. The outstanding question is how much must be invested before connecting it becomes the simple part.


Evaluación presupuestaria: asistente holográfico doméstico a medida

Gracias por la aclaración. Entiendo que el asistente propuesto es exclusivamente holográfico y que la emisión de aromas queda fuera de su alcance. También coincido en que una presencia física convincente podría aportar valor.

Mi preocupación, sin embargo, es el presupuesto de desarrollo.

Eliminar el módulo de fragancias permite precisar las especificaciones, pero no reduce de manera significativa la partida destinada al confinamiento fotónico residencial.

Definir la experiencia completa

Para la versión plenamente desarrollada —no simplemente un avatar mostrado en una pantalla transparente—, el asistente tendría que aparecer en el espacio libre, conservar una presencia tridimensional coherente desde distintos ángulos, desplazarse alrededor de los muebles y acompañar al usuario de una habitación a otra.

Esto requeriría un sistema coordinado de holoemisores domésticos, controladores de campo a escala de habitación, transmisores holográficos móviles y un motor de continuidad espacial. El asistente no debería perder la mitad inferior del cuerpo al cruzar la puerta de la cocina ni aparecer momentáneamente dentro del refrigerador porque otro integrante de la familia lo haya abierto.

Son requisitos que se pueden incorporar a las especificaciones, pero también deben incorporarse al presupuesto.

Por lo tanto, el desarrollo comenzaría con holosimuladores especializados y salas de simulación holográfica residencial a escala real, o holodecks. Estas instalaciones permitirían validar interacciones domésticas habituales antes de entregar la tecnología a los clientes: sentarse frente al usuario, mantener el contacto visual, desplazarse por una escalera y conservar la estabilidad de la imagen mientras alguien atraviesa la habitación cargando un espejo.

Una carcasa pequeña y elegante seguiría siendo un objetivo de diseño adecuado. Las instalaciones necesarias para desarrollar lo que ocurre encima de esa carcasa serían considerablemente más grandes.

Presupuesto preliminar de planificación

Para una serie inicial ilustrativa de 100 asistentes domésticos configurados a medida, cuyos compradores absorbieran la totalidad del costo de desarrollo, propondría las siguientes partidas, en lugar de presupuestar el dispositivo como un proyecto convencional de electrónica de consumo.

Concepto de desarrollo o implementación Asignación ilustrativa
Holoemisión en espacio libre y confinamiento fotónico a escala de habitación 18 000 millones de USD
Holosimuladores y software de continuidad espacial 6 000 millones de USD
Holodecks de desarrollo a escala real y entornos de prueba residencial 9 000 millones de USD
Transmisores holográficos móviles y transferencia de campo entre habitaciones 7 000 millones de USD
Compensación de luz diurna, oclusión y coherencia para múltiples observadores 4 000 millones de USD
Validación de seguridad residencial, sistemas de calibración e infraestructura de servicio especializado 4 500 millones de USD
Integración de IA conversacional, interfaz de voz, Wi-Fi y aplicación complementaria 100 millones de USD
Fabricación de los primeros 100 asistentes 800 millones de USD
Instalación y puesta en marcha personalizada en cada vivienda 400 millones de USD
Subtotal 49 800 millones de USD
Reserva para contingencias de ingeniería: 25 % 12 450 millones de USD
Presupuesto total del programa 62 250 millones de USD

Al distribuir la totalidad de estos costos entre las 100 unidades, el costo estimado sería de:

622 500 000 dólares por asistente instalado.

Esta cifra corresponde a la recuperación de costos, no a una cotización de venta al público. Habría que añadir los costos de financiamiento, los impuestos, los márgenes comerciales y los gastos posteriores de operación.

La conexión Wi-Fi estaría incluida.

Por qué importa el volumen de producción

La partida de fabricación e instalación física representa apenas 12 millones de dólares por vivienda, antes de contingencias. La cifra mucho mayor surge de repartir el programa de investigación entre solo 100 clientes.

Fabricar un transmisor adicional no equivale, desde el punto de vista financiero, a desarrollar por primera vez la transmisión holográfica móvil.

Del mismo modo, reducir el tamaño del asistente no reduciría automáticamente el gasto de desarrollo. Comprimir un entorno holográfico del tamaño de una habitación en un objeto similar a una lámpara de noche exigiría, por sí mismo, un programa considerable de miniaturización. «Pequeño» describe la carcasa prevista, no necesariamente la inversión.

El procesamiento en la nube podría disminuir las necesidades de cómputo local, pero el holograma tendría que aparecer de todos modos en la sala del cliente. La partida de servicios en la nube no sustituye el equipo de emisión doméstico.

Además, este presupuesto supone un asistente exclusivamente visual. La interacción mediante luz sólida, la manipulación de objetos y la posibilidad de llevarle una taza de té al usuario requerirían definir un alcance adicional y aprobar su financiamiento por separado. No convendría incorporar esas funciones de manera informal bajo el apartado «interacción con el hogar inteligente».

Conclusión sobre la inversión

Agradezco los comentarios y la intención de hacer que la IA resulte más accesible. Mi objeción no es que un asistente holográfico carezca de valor. Es que no esperaría que OpenAI financiara la investigación de base en holotecnología, construyera los holodecks de desarrollo, estableciera una plataforma de transmisión móvil y recuperara esos costos mediante una producción limitada de dispositivos domésticos a medida.

El asistente conversacional es uno de los componentes. El resto constituye un programa de desarrollo de holografía residencial.

Por lo tanto, antes de discutir la apariencia del avatar o el acabado decorativo de la base, la propuesta tendría que identificar quién aportaría los 62 250 millones de dólares y cuántos clientes estarían dispuestos a comprar las unidades resultantes.

«Conéctalo y el asistente aparece» sigue siendo una experiencia de usuario atractiva. Lo que falta resolver es cuánto habría que invertir para que conectarlo llegue a ser la parte sencilla.

Hi Jay,

Thank you for the detailed analysis — and for the rather spectacular $62.25 billion budget. :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

I think, however, that we are budgeting two different products.

My proposal is not for a first-generation, Star Trek-style free-space hologram that independently follows a user through every room, maintains perfect multi-angle visibility, navigates furniture, and requires full residential holodecks.

A practical first-generation system could be much simpler:

  • The user’s existing computer or cloud services handle the heavy AI processing.
  • A smartwatch or smartphone can provide identity, location, basic controls, and proximity information.
  • Wi-Fi/Bluetooth connects the components.
  • A dedicated optical/projection unit provides the visual assistant in the room.
  • The hardware does not need to contain a full computer in every unit.

In other words, the first engineering question should not be:
“How much would it cost to build Star Trek?”

It should be:
“What is the simplest commercially viable version we can build with technology that already exists or is close to existing?”

Development costs also should not be evaluated only against the first 100 units. A consumer technology platform is normally developed with the expectation of scaling to potentially thousands or millions of users, with hardware sales, subscriptions, software services, upgrades, and future product generations contributing to recovery of the initial investment.

I am not claiming that true free-space holography is inexpensive or trivial. I am simply saying that it is not necessary for Version 1.

Start with the achievable system. Improve the optics. Miniaturize the hardware. Increase spatial freedom generation by generation.

And yes — the Wi-Fi can stay included. :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

The holodeck can wait for Version 12.

Legally, you should be ok. However, smells can be trademarked:

Keep in mind that OpenAI will post-train on all smells and will have unlimited access, Therefore, it will be important to guarantee that each smell is unique for each customer. Luckily, smells are infinite:

So, the smell model will have to be trained to produce unique fragrances. You may need to modify your cost analysis.

Jay and Jeff,

You’ve both raised interesting constraints, so I’d like to turn the question back to you.

Jay: if a full room-scale free-space hologram is too expensive for a first-generation product, what architecture would you propose for a commercially realistic Version 1 that still preserves the feeling of an AI presence in the home?

Jeff: if scent trademarks or proprietary fragrance profiles are a concern, what technical or legal framework would you recommend so an olfactory system could generate useful scents without infringing protected scent identities?

I’m genuinely interested in the solutions, not only the limitations.

If we agree that the concept has value, then the next useful step is:

What is the simplest, safest, and most scalable way to build it?

I brought the concept. You found the engineering and legal puzzles. :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:
Now I’d love to hear your proposed solutions.

The AI does not need a biological sense of smell. A smart home can convert air chemistry into data. Sensors integrated into the HVAC return system could analyze volatile compounds, transmit the readings over Wi-Fi, and allow the AI to interpret what is present in the air. The same infrastructure could then manage scent delivery and clearing cycles by room.

Jay :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

I think we may be talking about two very different versions of the same idea.

I am not proposing a Star-Trek-style hologram walking freely through every room of the house from day one.

My concept is simpler:

A holographic AI home assistant where the hologram is mainly the visual presence/interface, while the real intelligence comes from the AI software behind it — with stronger general reasoning, more memory, internet connectivity, safety limits, voice interaction, and personalization.

The first version could appear from one dedicated projection station, almost like a “genie lamp” for AI :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:. Later, the system could expand to other rooms or devices.

So the expensive part does not have to be creating a fully independent physical holographic person. The intelligence can remain in the cloud, while the home device provides the visual presence, microphones, speakers, sensors, and projection.

And yes… Wi-Fi is definitely included. :joy:

Now I am curious: if we remove the Star-Trek version and design only this first-generation system, what would your architecture and budget look like?

I should let you know clearly: my replies were first extremely impractical but somewhat possible, and then taking seriously that such wished-for hologram technology was on the cusp of even existing. It is not, there is no “simple single hologram projector” that could operate like you expect.

Here is something that could be sold, with the same technology of dead music performers appearing on stage as a “hologram”: merely videos of impersonators or computer graphics reflected on glass.

Jay :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

Okay, now we are getting somewhere.

Since Pepper’s Ghost or a similar reflected-CGI approach is something that could actually be built with existing technology, I want to give you the homework back. :squinting_face_with_tongue:

Could you present the complete practical concept?

I would like to see how you would combine:

  • the transparent/reflected display or Pepper’s Ghost-style visual system
  • a real-time AI-generated avatar
  • microphones and speakers
  • cameras or sensors for interaction
  • cloud-based AI reasoning
  • memory and personalization
  • internet connectivity
  • safety controls
  • and a simple home device or “projection station” that makes the AI feel present in the room

And most importantly: explain why this approach would help my original idea.

My goal was never necessarily to invent a scientifically perfect free-floating hologram on day one. The goal is to create the experience of an intelligent AI presence in the home — something you can see, talk to, interact with, and eventually personalize.

So if Pepper’s Ghost, transparent displays, CGI, or another existing technology can create that first-generation experience, then perhaps the important innovation is not the hologram physics itself.

It is the combination of AI intelligence + visual presence + memory + interaction + home hardware.

Now tell me, Mr. $62-billion-Wi-Fi-included engineer :joy::

What would the realistic first-generation product look like, how would it work, and why would it be a useful stepping stone toward the larger vision?

Self-explanatory, although the image creation was by myself explaining.

Okay Jay :squinting_face_with_tongue: ‘self-explanatory’ doesn’t get you off that easy. Tell me what part of this can actually be built toda

I am not an AI that responds on commands and does jobs, except for my own entertainment.

First, what I fed the image creator, that would be revealed upon zoom and inspection of visual hints in the UI within.

A sleek, all-in-one touchscreen multimedia hub centered on a friendly, multimodal AI assistant. Conceived as a natural presence in the home—not a desktop computer—it combines conversation, entertainment and discreet whole-home control.

Interaction. Voice and touch are primary inputs. An expressive, responsive on-screen face gives the assistant a personable character, with readable transcripts accompanying spoken exchanges. The system is always listening for commands directed to it.

Sound and control. Nearby high-fidelity stereo speakers support music playback. The display offers subtle cues for managing climate, appliances, food inventory, robotic cleaning, lighting, window shades or glass opacity, and casting films to wall-scale cinema displays.

Form. Premium and near-future: at the edge of emerging technology, rather than overtly science-fictional. The device is exceptionally thin, wireless and seemingly lightweight enough to relocate easily. Its proportions appear unconstrained by the bulk of circuit boards or batteries.

Setting. Show it in a dedicated eye-level wall nook within a lived-in space, integrated into the home’s architecture rather than arranged as a workstation. Similar connected interfaces elsewhere suggest a cohesive, home-wide system.

So you have your “friendly face” to interact with - although those can actually be off-putting today and don’t serve as a quality upgrade.

GPT-6 AI analysis of the technology I mentioned

Practicality today — September 2026

Assessment: credible as a custom-integrated home system. The main compromises are device compatibility, incomplete automation and the need to conceal—not eliminate—power and computing hardware. (Home Assistant)

  1. Touchscreen multimedia hub — mature. Amazon’s Echo Show 21 already combines a wall-mounted touchscreen, voice assistant, entertainment and smart-home controls. (Amazon News)

  2. Multimodal conversational AI — deployable through cloud services. OpenAI’s Realtime API supports spoken interaction, text, image input and tool calls for custom interfaces. (OpenAI)

  3. Expressive on-screen persona — feasible with custom software. NVIDIA’s Audio2Face generates real-time facial animation and lip synchronization from speech, supplying the animation layer rather than a complete assistant. (NVIDIA Developer)

  4. Conversation transcripts — mature. ChatGPT Voice already provides readable transcripts of voice conversations. (ChatGPT)

  5. Always-listening commands — practical with a wake word. Home Assistant Voice detects wake words on-device and includes a switch that physically disconnects its microphones. (Home Assistant)

  6. Nearby high-fidelity stereo — mature, but still powered. KEF’s LS50 Wireless II provides streaming stereo audio over wireless connections while retaining mains-power requirements. (KEF Americas)

  7. Climate, lighting and appliance control — practical for compatible equipment. Samsung SmartThings already connects household appliances, air conditioners and lighting within a common control system. (Google Play)

  8. AI-directed whole-home control — feasible with integration and restricted permissions. Home Assistant’s OpenAI integration lets an assistant inspect and control devices explicitly made available to it. (Home Assistant)

  9. Food-stock awareness — partially automated. Samsung’s AI Vision Inside recognizes selected unobscured foods, but other items still require manual labeling. (Samsung it)

  10. Robotic cleaning — mature for floor care, not general housekeeping. Roborock’s Saros 10R combines vacuuming, mopping, automated dock maintenance and voice-directed cleaning. (Roborock Global Official Store)

  11. Wall-scale cinema and casting — deployable with separate display hardware. Epson’s LS800 supports projection up to 150 inches and Chromecast-based content sharing. (Epson)

  12. Window shades and opacity — available, with installation work. Lutron supplies automated shades, while Gauzy offers switchable privacy glass; privacy frosting and light-blocking shading are distinct capabilities. (Caséta by Lutron)

  13. Exceptionally thin, lightweight construction — feasible within real hardware constraints. Apple’s 13-inch iPad Pro measures 5.1 mm thick and weighs 579 grams in its Wi-Fi version, while still containing processors and a battery. (Apple)

  14. Wireless, movable operation — feasible for limited periods. LG’s detachable 27-inch StanbyME 2 touchscreen advertises up to four hours of battery operation before recharging. (LG DK)

  15. Wall-nook placement and repeated interfaces — mature architectural integration. Control4’s T5 in-wall touchscreens already provide distributed access to lighting, temperature, shades, entertainment and room-to-room communication. (control4.com)

OpenAI is considering a home assistant AI device - entering the same market that lost Amazon billions of dollars. You’ll have to see if your feature requests for a hologram to be included had any weight.

Jay, you built me a very smart screen — but I’m still asking you to let Ori out of the screen. :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:

What I’m imagining is not simply an AI face displayed on a wall or tablet. The phone, computer or smartwatch would identify the user, carry the conversation and manage the Wi-Fi handoff. The AI itself could remain cloud-based.

But the visual assistant should appear outside the device, through a separate local holographic or projection module.

So the concept is:

Ori Home Assistant = OpenAI AI + personal profile + voice + Wi-Fi handoff + smart-home controls + local holographic display.

The important part is continuity. If I’m working at my computer, cooking in the kitchen, relaxing by the pool or sitting outside, the same personalized assistant follows the interaction from one authorized device or projection point to another.

I’m not asking the phone to create the hologram. The phone helps the system know who I am, where I am, and where Ori should appear next.

That is the experience I’m trying to describe: not another screen we talk to, but an AI presence that can move with us through everyday life.

So now :squinting_face_with_tongue:: what is the most realistic first-generation way to get Ori out of the screen?

It appears that your insistence for a bonafide hologram assistant is for entertainment purposes. Personally, I think it’s kind of creepy… but that’s just me.

But I regress. After the novelty wears off, what then? May I suggest that you start thinking BIG:

You are gonna need VC capital, so you need to think big or they won’t touch you with a ten foot pole.

Glad you asked. The real revenue is a market niche that keeps the cable companies in business.

Holo-AI for women

(requires holo-matter technology)

A bit more NSFW than prompted

Unexpected AI gender also.

Yup. like the Ultimate Fantasy niche: