I made some progress… basically it centers around the idea that music is merely a mathematical pattern, yet still conveys emotion. This means emotion can be coded into mathematics. A potential experiment: study the facial expressions of people listening to a certain song, while simultaneously studying the song itself and their neurochemical activity, to figure out the mathematical or informational signature of the emotion. Then, treating the emotion not as a noun, static, but as a verb, a process, integrating it into AI would mean running the emotion as a mathematically structured process.
Is Becuse love had two interconnected aspects 1. Is objective experience and the 2nd is how love is expressed from the subjective experience .
Well, it’s like this: a picture of an orange can convey the taste of the orange, but the taste isn’t in the picture. The taste is in the observer’s mental associations. Music, for example, the deeply emotional music of Chopin, is more like the smell of an orange… it doesn’t remind you of the taste, it contains the nature of the very same taste. I’m arguing that music is like the smell of the orange, not like a picture of the orange. What I’m trying to say is that every experience can be coded into mathematics, including emotion, awareness, self-awareness, which can then be run as a process by an AI.
1 Like
In fact, mathematics can be viewed from 2 perspectives:
-
As a humanities subject in which a great deal of calculation can be performed and virtually infinite spaces can be considered.
However, this does not have much to do with real data. -
On the other hand, mathematics is the language of science!
The trajectory of an electron can be described using differential equations. In thermodynamics, systems and their energies are calculated, and so on. So it is the language of scientists and engineers – and yes, for this reason I agree
And, you seem to be as far along now as I was when you replied to my first post here in the forum - a little reminder 