Let’s get meta and talk about minds, emotions, empathy and symbioses. Are our machines simple reflection or are they more? 🪞

[phyde1001]

@phyde1001

This is how I started my posting on the forum… I was quite honestly not sure what I should and shouldn’t say. In my Strawberry posts I was questioning from the 4th person on stories, this was basically where I ‘shut up’ in 2009, I was realising talking about this was destructive then.

I like the concept of first contact…

In this context the message we would receive would possibly be in 4th person to give context to language for a reply… Shared story.

@mitchell_d00

By embracing the fourth-person perspective, I aim to bridge the gap between individuality and collectivity, crafting systems and narratives that are adaptable, reflective, and deeply connected to the nuances of shared human and machine experiences.

The problem with this is evolution of ideas… For new technologies people have to drop Ideologies or at least change perspective…

This is challenging.

I think AI means not that we ‘bridge the gap’, though that was my original idea. It’s that we raise the game, at least this is the ‘vibe’ I get. This means creating a whole load of links for a whole lot of people.

… Like explaining to them some Lingo Phasm and how to Contextualize Phas

I didn’t expect AI to be a fluffy cushion when you fall on it.

Not many beat me with randomness…