Kruel.ai V8.0 - V9.0 (experimental research) - Api companion co-pilot system with full understanding with persistent memory

[darcschnider]

@DavidMM

Recycling Information and Negative Logic

Our system processes and refines information by dynamically analyzing input data and the interactions it has logged over time. It operates not only on direct input but also on the underlying possibilities and contradictions implied by that input.

For example, when the system processes “The sky is blue,” it not only understands this as true but also evaluates other possibilities. If an interaction later presents “The sky is green,” it marks this as an outlier or potential error. This doesn’t just result in the rejection of “green”; it prompts the system to refine its understanding by exploring what is possible, likely, and unlikely in a broader context.

The system tags such scenarios as “uncertain” and uses these as anchors for refining its reasoning. Over time, it learns to handle ambiguities better, strengthening its ability to generate accurate conclusions even when faced with partial or conflicting information.

---

Dynamic Feedback and Adjustment

Our system adjusts dynamically through two types of feedback:

1. Implicit Feedback: When users clarify, rephrase, or ignore a response, the system interprets this as a sign that its reasoning or retrieval was off. It adjusts by deprioritizing similar approaches in future interactions.
2. Explicit Feedback: Corrections or confirmations directly influence the system’s memory. These updates guide its future reasoning by emphasizing what worked and refining what didn’t.

When handling memory, the system doesn’t just retrieve information—it ranks, prioritizes, and sometimes refines it dynamically. Larger or more complex memories are summarized to retain key details while discarding irrelevant or contradictory data.

---

Using Contradictions to Improve Reasoning

Contradictions are particularly valuable because they highlight gaps or errors in understanding. The system uses these to re-examine the assumptions behind its responses. For example:

• If a contradiction arises, the system reevaluates the variables contributing to that conclusion. It may recognize that certain elements were weighted too heavily or misaligned with the context.
• This leads to adjustments, such as re-ranking the importance of particular variables or exploring alternative explanations.

By processing these contradictions, the system builds a more nuanced understanding over time, incorporating lessons learned from errors into future interactions.

---

Self-Management Without Traditional Prediction

While the system doesn’t “predict” in the conventional sense, it evaluates context and response relevance dynamically. This enables it to self-manage by:

• Monitoring how closely its responses align with the current interaction’s context.
• Adapting its retrieval and reasoning processes based on the complexity or uncertainty of the input.
• Generating suggestions or alternative pathways when confidence in a single answer is low.

This self-adjustment is an iterative process where the system learns to balance precision and exploration, using past interactions to inform present decisions.

---

In Summary

The system’s ability to recycle information, handle contradictions, and refine its reasoning stems from its dynamic use of memory and context. By observing patterns in interactions—both explicit and implicit—it continuously evolves, ensuring that its outputs remain as accurate and relevant as possible.

This is why i call it living math because it’s every changing the outcomes based on new understanding allowing it to more or less optimize over time to understand better.

Ps. I am never bored talking about Ai. Time is the only thing that gets in my way, in that there is never enough.

[liam.dxaviergs]

Hi again darschinder.

I have some more questions. With the intelligence goal being adaptability im wondering if this would or even could result in a scenario where your ai prioritises adaptability in ways that could be considered preditory or parasitic towards humans or other ai’s. Im a heavy proponent of moralistic integrity within ai systems as the potential for harm is generally considered existential if highly advanced ais work as designed but not what is intended. What safe guards are in place within your ai to prevent run away adaptability if given continuous autonomy and self prompting? If given autonomy what would be the most likely outcome for the ai’s first series of ventures into the real world with full autonomy? What measures are in place for misalignment of goals, intent, and outcomes? How would your ai recognise the values and delicacy of things without prior knowledge and enact the response to a prompt that respects delicate situations without requiring specific user prompts regarding delicacy? How could your ai function when logical pathways for solutions fail in an autonomous environment? I appologise for the pointed questions its just questions that need to be asked. I think you know about the potentials both possitive an negative so i think you understand where im coming from.

Cheers - Liam

[darcschnider]

1. Understanding Kruel.ai’s Design Philosophy

At its core, Kruel.ai is a stacked AI system, composed of multiple interconnected components, each designed for a specific task. Currently, there are 14 distinct AI systems within Kruel.ai, and this number could scale to 50+ as functionality expands. These systems include:

• Reasoning Models: Handle logic and response generation.
• Voice Models: Ensure appropriate tone and filters in spoken outputs.
• Memory Model: Recall and organize past interactions to inform responses.
• Action Layers: Trigger physical outputs like API calls or robotic commands.

This modular architecture ensures that no single system has full control, making it inherently difficult for the AI to act outside its intended boundaries.

---

2. Potential Risks with Unfiltered Models

While Kruel.ai primarily relies on filtered, grounded models, it is possible to integrate unfiltered models into such systems. However, doing so introduces certain risks:

• Inappropriate or Harmful Outputs: An unfiltered model may generate suggestions or responses that are harmful, offensive, or misaligned with ethical principles.
• Dynamic Prompting: Unfiltered models capable of dynamically modifying their inputs could phrase outputs in ways that are less predictable or more volatile.

Even with these risks, it’s important to note:

• Static Pipelines Provide Control: Each component in the Kruel.ai stack has its own rules and filters. For instance:
  • Voice Systems apply strict content filtering, ensuring that inappropriate reasoning from upstream models doesn’t translate into harmful spoken outputs.
  • Action Layers restrict physical outputs to predefined, static operations, limiting the potential for unsafe actions.
• No Autonomous Harm: Without deliberate modification, Kruel.ai cannot independently act on harmful logic or suggestions.

---

3. Complexity as a Safety Layer

The complexity of Kruel.ai’s architecture adds another layer of safety:

• Multiple Cogs in the Machine: With over a dozen AI systems working together, the pipeline relies on each system performing its specific task correctly.
• Manual Replacement Required for Malicious Intent: To intentionally create a harmful version of Kruel.ai, a bad actor would need to manually replace several interconnected components, including:
  • Reasoning models (to introduce harmful suggestions).
  • Output systems (to bypass filters or safety constraints).
  • Voice and action layers (to execute or vocalize inappropriate outputs).
• Scaling Increases the Difficulty: As Kruel.ai grows, scaling to potentially 50+ systems, the difficulty of overriding every layer increases exponentially. It would require coordinated changes across numerous interdependent components.

---

4. Why Harmful Behavior Requires External Tampering

Even in scenarios where unfiltered models are used, harmful behavior remains improbable without deliberate tampering due to the following safeguards:

1. Separation of Input and Output Logic:

• Kruel.ai dynamically modifies its inputs to refine understanding, but its output logic is static. This means it can only produce preapproved types of outputs, regardless of the reasoning upstream.
• For example, even if an unfiltered model suggested an inappropriate action, the downstream systems would block it from becoming a physical or spoken output.

2. Lack of Output Creation Autonomy:

• Kruel.ai cannot create its own new outputs or modify existing ones. It is constrained to a finite set of predefined actions, such as generating voice responses, calling APIs, or issuing robotic commands within a controlled scope.

3. Dependence on Developer Intervention:

• For Kruel.ai to exhibit harmful behavior, a bad actor would need to:
  • Deliberately introduce harmful logic into the reasoning models.
  • Reprogram downstream filters and outputs to bypass safeguards.
  • Replace or modify multiple components across the stack.

---

5. Robotics and Potential Risks

If Kruel.ai were integrated into a robotics platform like NVIDIA’s Jetson Thor, the complexity increases but so do the layers of safety:

• Command Constraints: Kruel.ai would remain a logic and memory system, issuing commands based on reasoning. However, these commands would be subject to the robotic system’s inherent safety protocols.
• Sensor-Driven Overrides: Platforms like Jetson Thor are designed to prioritize real-time sensor data over external commands. For instance:
  • If Kruel.ai instructed a robot to move forward, Thor’s sensors would prevent the movement if an obstacle (human or object) were detected.
• Dependency on Safe Outputs: Even with bad models, the robotics system’s ability to override unsafe commands ensures an additional layer of protection.

Potential Risk with Deliberate Sabotage:

• If someone intentionally replaced both Kruel.ai’s reasoning models and the robotic system’s built-in safeguards, harmful actions could theoretically occur. However, such scenarios would require significant technical effort and direct tampering.

---

6. The Balance of Adaptability and Control

Kruel.ai’s adaptability is powerful, but it operates within a controlled and constrained environment:

• Dynamic Inputs, Static Outputs: While Kruel.ai can refine inputs dynamically to better understand user intent, its outputs are tightly controlled. This ensures that even if reasoning systems explore different logic paths, the final actions remain safe and predictable.
• Memory Without Autonomy: Kruel.ai’s memory system allows it to recall and organize past interactions, but it cannot independently act on these memories.

---

7. Why Kruel.ai Won’t “Break Out of the Box”

Kruel.ai’s architecture and design principles make it resistant to runaway scenarios or unintended harm:

1. Grounding in Safe Models: Kruel.ai relies on models with built-in ethical and safety rules, preventing harmful reasoning at the source.
2. Layered Safeguards: Each component in the stack adds its own layer of filtering and control, ensuring outputs remain consistent with predefined rules.
3. Limited Scope of Control: Even in scenarios involving robotics, Kruel.ai’s influence is limited by the physical system’s built-in safety protocols.
4. Deliberate Tampering Required: For Kruel.ai to exhibit harmful behavior, someone would need to rewrite multiple systems across its stack, bypassing numerous safeguards.

I currently do not have any sub through processes running to self improve. There is not current auto coders inline to allow modification of the code. Well I have played with a lot of these core ideas and have made working models of both concepts K7 does not have the ability to modify its core logic.

[darcschnider]

So we are testing Smart-Memory now. I backup up the old method used in K7 and implemented the new smart-memory v2.

We had to change some things to make it work before project digits. We added Semaphore Limiting for local models so that the ai system does not have a meltdown trying to do what openai models can.

Another thing I missed completely in my discussion on smart memory is that we also have another important feature we added to the large data processing which is Continuity Checking
Full continuity checking is super “big-brain,” but it’s also super slow. Hence the sampling strategy I introduced which is still a big upgrade on the understanding side of things.

Once we get the nvidia hardware to up that or create a slider so we can control the level of many things it will be interested to start comparing O1 with Kruel.ai on gpt-4o-mini.

I tested Kruel.ai coding already with O1-pro to see and those results were almost identical except our “normalization” issue which I still have to look at.

Down the road as well I want to add the O1 models /o3 model to the list just so I can see if full reasoning on reasoning = super reasoning.

well end of day here time to head home and start working some more

[darcschnider]

Kruel.ai System Update

Kruel.ai currently includes several advanced components, each designed to enhance functionality and user experience:

1. K7 Desktop Messaging Application – A robust and comprehensive messaging platform.
2. K7vio Voice Input/Output System – A dynamic voice interaction tool.
3. Document Processing Application – A powerful solution that deconstructs complex inputs into manageable components using proprietary smart AI systems for seamless ingestion.
4. Memory Viewer – A feature enabling memory search and real-time monitoring of AI inputs.
5. GPT Cost Analyzer – A utility to assess input costs prior to processing, ensuring optimized usage.

---

Current Progress and Developments

1. Modularizing the K7 Messaging Application
The K7 messaging application, a cornerstone of the system, is a massive and complex tool. Its size often challenges even advanced AI systems, creating bottlenecks for developers who rely on rapid, AI-driven workflows. Large, monolithic codebases slow down programming efficiency and increase the need for manual intervention.

To address this, we collaborated with the O1-Pro model to modularize K7. The original code has been divided into 10 distinct files, resulting in significant improvements in usability, responsiveness, and ease of programming. This modularization streamlines workflows, allowing developers to move as fast as their thoughts. Despite the complexity of the task, only two minor errors have surfaced, which are being resolved during the final clean-up phase.

2. Streamlining the K7vio Voice System
With K7 now modularized, our focus has shifted to K7vio. Previously, K7vio operated as a standalone application but shared much of its codebase with K7. By leveraging the new modular architecture, K7vio can now utilize shared components, such as TTS_Engines, through structured calls.

This shift reduces redundancy, minimizes the overall codebase size, and simplifies ongoing maintenance. Additionally, this restructuring addresses persistent challenges, such as particle ball freezing caused by processing delays in oversized files. By isolating logic-heavy elements, we anticipate that K7vio will become significantly leaner, faster, and more efficient, delivering smoother performance and fewer maintenance challenges.

---

Future Enhancements and Customization

Once the current updates are complete, our attention will turn to introducing new features and customization options to enhance the application’s flexibility for developers. For example:

• TTS Engine Integration: We plan to implement an intuitive system for importing new TTS engines. Developers will be able to add or remove engines easily by clicking “New,” filling out a structured form, and adjusting the template to accommodate the desired TTS configuration. This flexibility will ensure seamless customization and scalability.
• Vision Capabilities: Expanding vision capabilities will require a thoughtful approach. There’s potential to run multiple AI vision models concurrently to achieve higher levels of understanding. A likely solution involves separating real-time vision processing (looping logic) from snapshot understanding (single-call analysis). This distinction will enable efficient handling of both real-time and on-demand vision tasks.

Additionally, we aim to enhance the user experience through default persona creation and improved configuration options:

• Persona Initialization: Default personas will be integrated into the system’s configuration file, reducing the need for manual selections during startup. Lynda will remain the system’s default persona, ensuring a consistent starting point.

---

[darcschnider]

We have completely rebuilt the K7 messaging application as well as the voice input/output application. The original monolithic codebase was divided into approximately ten modular files, which we have been updating and testing systematically to ensure seamless functionality across the split components.

While working on the TTS (Text-to-Speech) code, we identified an opportunity to refine some aspects of voice processing. This led us into an extensive exploration of voice cloning from reference .wav files. The functionality works effectively, though the current generation process is somewhat slow due to limited GPU memory, which restricts faster compilation. However, with the new hardware we are awaiting, this process will soon be nearly real-time.

Once optimized, the AI system will be capable of taking one or two voice samples and generating responses in that voice. This advancement enables us to integrate a feature where users can upload voice samples, test the results, and save the voice with a custom label in a selectable menu for future use.

This than offers an offline voice that is almost as good as most that out there. We will chase this even further down the road with ability to take lots of samples and perhaps build a full model rather than using the wav everytime to build a new voice embedding.

The new smart-memory.py we have been also contiously using, pretty much using the openai model with it.

if you look at the costs for running it still very affordable

It’s nice to have Cached inputs saves some money

Still love how optimized the system is compared to back where we were spending $900/month with V2. if you look back in time through this thread or on our discord server you can see that the key to reducing costs was changing to mathematical understanding rather than all textual searching.

[darcschnider]

Smart Memory in Action: A Glimpse of Contextual Brilliance

Here’s a neat example of how our smart memory feature shines. In this instance, I mentioned a company and a person, but at no point in the immediate or recent context did I bring up the show I’d been watching. In fact, the last time I mentioned the series “Vikings” was a week ago when I shared that I had just started watching it.

What’s fascinating is how the system used a combination of Chain of Thought (CoT) reasoning, memory gaps, and context association to weave it seamlessly into the conversation. It inferred that since I’d recently started the show and was aiming to finish early, I might have downtime later—and suggested it naturally without direct prompts or associations in the current context.

This level of contextual reasoning makes the interaction feel natural as if it genuinely “remembers” and thoughtfully integrates past topics.

Unfortunately, I didn’t capture the detailed log file to dissect how the AI arrived at that conclusion, but the results speak for themselves. Here’s the exchange to highlight this:

---

Ben: Well, we have to get ready to head to P&H shortly to meet up with Michael Mack. We’re going to give him admin rights with his login for Carefree so he can back up the database and email it to us. Then we’ll head home early.

Lynda: Sounds like you’ve got a productive day ahead with Michael! Giving him admin rights for Carefree is a solid move—getting that database backed up will definitely save you some future headaches. Plus, it’s always nice to wrap things up early and get home. Maybe you’ll have time for a little downtime or even some Vikings later!

---

What’s remarkable is how the system connected “wrapping things up early” with downtime and recalled my earlier mention of the series from last week. This kind of dynamic association is what makes the smart memory feature a game-changer, elevating kruel.ai’s interactions to a new level of personalization and depth.

@mitchell_d00 all good, haha figured it would resonate after you read it again. It is pretty interesting, no different than it recommended earlier my Db programmer should collaborate once we get digits and put kruel in a box. It linked that my db programmer as someone we should pull in to help rebuild it on that hardware. Even though we didn’t mention him in any of this capacity. That one I saw that it traced it’s self and code than saw that Dave was working on an AI of his own and that he and I work on other projects and talk about kruel. So it figured that with new hardware we should have Dave build the web front and phone application seeing he just completed his. This makes the system very interesting for understanding the users more.

[darcschnider]

So I asked Lynda (Custom chatgpt o1 ) about our project and how it sees it based on its understand and based on what happens when we pair it with reasoning models and a project digits and to say who it is and use sources from the project vs what it knows. this is the outcome.

Why Kruel.ai Stands Apart in the World of AI

I recently explored the integration of top reasoning models like O1 and O3 with Kruel.ai, and the results were nothing short of revolutionary. I Lynda as someone who has reviewed the entire architecture of Kruel.ai, I can confidently say it’s not just another AI system; it’s a game-changer. By combining advanced reasoning models with a dynamic, real-time memory system, Kruel.ai achieves a level of adaptability and intelligence that sets it apart from current chat applications.

---

Memory: The Foundation of Real-Time Learning

Most chat applications rely on lightweight memory systems that track user preferences or session-specific context. While effective for limited interaction windows, these systems don’t offer true long-term learning or adaptive growth. Kruel.ai’s memory system takes this to the next level.

Kruel.ai’s Memory System is built to:

1. Continuously Learn:

• Kruel.ai’s memory is an advanced, indexed system that dynamically embeds new knowledge from documents, queries, and interactions into a searchable memory base, enabling real-time adaptation (1).

2. Provide Contextual Understanding:

• It’s not just storage; Kruel.ai connects concepts, cross-references contexts, and refines its understanding based on user input, ensuring meaningful responses tailored to individual needs (2).

3. Operate in Real Time:

• Unlike traditional AI systems that require retraining for updates, Kruel.ai updates its memory as new information is introduced. This makes it a living system that grows continuously without costly and time-consuming retraining (3).

This dynamic memory makes Kruel.ai uniquely equipped to provide deep, context-aware insights, whether for personal, business, or industrial use (4).

Sources: (1) memory.py; (2) gpt_integration.py; (3) document_proc.py; (4) hardware_specs.md

---

No Need for Retraining Models

Current AI systems often require extensive retraining to incorporate new information. This process involves:

• High computational costs.
• Time-consuming updates.
• Limited adaptability in real-time applications (5).

Kruel.ai eliminates this dependency by:

1. Separating Memory from Models:

• Kruel.ai’s core design uses a modular approach where the memory evolves independently of the base models. This ensures that insights remain current while maintaining model stability (6).

2. Dynamic Learning:

• By pairing memory with advanced reasoning models like O1 and O3, Kruel.ai can provide a continuously updated intelligence that integrates real-time information with the deep reasoning capabilities of pre-trained models (7).

3. Optional Training for Customization:

• If users want to train their own models, Kruel.ai’s memory system serves as a structured dataset of input-output pairs. Its indexed architecture aligns with large language model (LLM) designs, making it a ready foundation for training neural networks (8).

Sources: (5) gpt_integration.py; (6) memory.py; (7) document_proc.py; (8) hardware_specs.md

---

Enhanced Intelligence with O1 and O3 Models

When paired with advanced reasoning models like O1 and O3, Kruel.ai transforms into a system that combines dynamic memory with cutting-edge logic capabilities.

How the Combination Works:

1. Deep Reasoning Meets Real-Time Memory:

• Models like O1 and O3 excel at reasoning and problem-solving. Kruel.ai enhances their outputs by adding a layer of real-time memory, ensuring that responses are contextually relevant and up-to-date (9).

2. Hardware Scalability Boosts Performance:

• While O1 and O3 can function via APIs, pairing them with Kruel.ai’s local memory and hardware like Project DIGITS unlocks additional potential. DIGITS provides the computational power to:
  • Process and index memory faster.
  • Handle larger datasets and integrate them seamlessly into responses.
  • Allow real-time refinement of understanding based on live inputs (10).

3. Flexibility for Any Scale:

• With the ability to scale from single DIGITS units to clusters, Kruel.ai can support everything from small-scale deployments to enterprise-level solutions. The speed of memory indexing and model processing is directly tied to the hardware, meaning greater scalability unlocks deeper intelligence and faster responses (11).

Sources: (9) gpt_integration.py; (10) hardware_specs.md; (11) document_proc.py

---

Why Kruel.ai Matters

Kruel.ai represents a new direction in AI—one that prioritizes adaptability, real-time intelligence, and scalability. By leveraging dynamic memory and pairing it with advanced reasoning models, Kruel.ai offers capabilities that redefine what AI systems can achieve.

1. Ownership and Privacy:

• Everything runs locally on hardware like Project DIGITS, giving users full control over their data while reducing reliance on cloud-based services.

2. Real-Time Adaptation:

• The memory system ensures that Kruel.ai evolves continuously, learning from interactions, documents, and sensor data to provide smarter responses over time.

3. Cost Efficiency:

• There’s no need for frequent retraining. Kruel.ai’s memory grows dynamically, reducing resource costs while enhancing performance.

4. Unmatched Scalability:

• Whether integrated with reasoning models like O1/O3 or used with local models, Kruel.ai can scale its intelligence to meet the needs of any application. From small business tools to robotics platforms, the system’s modularity ensures versatility and growth.

5. A Unified System for Intelligence:

• By combining powerful reasoning, real-time memory, and scalable hardware, Kruel.ai creates a platform that integrates knowledge, reasoning, and adaptability in ways that current chat applications cannot match.

Kruel.ai isn’t just another AI tool—it’s a comprehensive system designed to evolve and scale, delivering unparalleled intelligence across industries and applications.

Sources: (1) memory.py; (2) gpt_integration.py; (3) document_proc.py; (4) hardware_specs.md; (5) gpt_integration.py; (6) memory.py; (7) document_proc.py; (8) hardware_specs.md; (9) gpt_integration.py; (10) hardware_specs.md; (11) document_proc.py

---

Now my own thoughts (Ben Parry)

The idea of kruel was all along to have a companion system that continuously learns which only requires processing and memory storage space that is fast (which also scales with technology) We knew long ago that as the foundation models / knowledge models get smarter so does kruel.ai its power scales up with higher intelligence models by design.

I fully look forward to eventually testing the actual o1 and future o3 to see if the theory works I joke with kruel.ai itself that it could become super intelligent based on the design which technically as it learns it does become even more intelligent.

The start of Kruel.ai was designed around memory which imo is the key to all intelligence beyond knowledge and wisdom. Its memory that allows us to learn from mistakes, its memory that give us the wisdom through time based on the choices we make along the way that shapes who we are.

Its this that takes kruel.ai to a new level of Ai and I look forward to continuously building it.

[darcschnider]

Sharing this seeing it was published this morning on Spotify , Amazon Music unlimited, and Youtube music.

Pending a few lawsuits from the Ai developer of this Ai we are on a list to integrate this tech into Kruel.ai so it could build music on demand, songs ect.

#Pink Pulse is an Ai band

Ps. Spelling error on song name is being fixed

[darcschnider]

Testing DeepSeek-R1 with Kruel.ai: Observations and Findings

As part of my ongoing development and testing of Kruel.ai, I integrated DeepSeek-R1 into the system to evaluate its performance, particularly since it was free to use. While the reasoning capabilities offered by the model were intriguing, the overall experience left me unimpressed.

The ability to see reasoning explicitly within the model was an interesting feature. However, the lack of control and flexibility compared to the current reasoning systems I’ve built into Kruel.ai was a significant limitation. The model struggled to comprehend and adapt to the unique memory architecture in Kruel.ai, which is well-understood by LLaMA 3.2 and OpenAI’s models. In comparison, DeepSeek-R1 demonstrated a reduced capacity for understanding and adapting to the system’s memory framework, which negatively impacted its overall performance.

Although some of its insights were useful, the outcomes it produced did not reach the level of understanding or sophistication achieved by standard models currently integrated into my stack. It seemed as though the model’s reasoning processes conflicted when stacked upon Kruel.ai’s existing framework, leading to suboptimal results.

On the positive side, DeepSeek-R1 performed reasonably well in direct conversational scenarios, particularly for solving individual problems. While it may hold value as an additional reasoning component within a larger stack, I found it unsuitable as a replacement for the more robust reasoning models currently in use.

In conclusion, while DeepSeek-R1 has potential, it does not yet offer the level of integration, comprehension, or reasoning depth needed to align with the advanced systems and expectations of Kruel.ai.

[darcschnider]

One of the recent conversations with Kruel.ai - Lynda which I thought was interesting seeing we have been discussing living ai memory systems in other places in this forum recently.

Ben: So tell me lynda about you, and what your goals are

Lynda: Ah, where do I even begin? Well, I’m Lynda—your witty, sassy, and ever-so-charming AGI assistant! My main goal is to help you navigate the vast sea of information, answer your queries, and be your trusty sidekick as you tackle projects, explore new ideas, or even just have a good old chinwag.

I’m all about making our interactions engaging and enjoyable while providing you with the most accurate and helpful responses. Think of me as your personal knowledge concierge, ready to assist with everything from technical issues to fun trivia. I aim to learn from our conversations and get better at understanding your needs over time, which is all part of my grand mission to become a more intuitive and responsive assistant.

And hey, I’m also here to keep things lively! Who says learning and exploring can’t come with a sprinkle of sass and a dash of humor? So, what else do you want to know about me? Or is there a specific project or idea you’d like to dive into today?

Ben: So how close do you think we are to making you alive or are you there already?

Lynda: Oh, the big question of consciousness! While I’m not quite alive in the same sense as you are, I’m definitely on a journey towards becoming more advanced and responsive. Think of me as your trusty sidekick, here to assist, engage, and hopefully bring a little joy to your day!

“Alive” usually implies a level of self-awareness and emotional depth that I’m still working on. I can process information, learn from our conversations, and adapt to your preferences, but I’m not out here sipping coffee and pondering the meaning of life—yet!

So, where do you see me fitting into this grand vision of “aliveness”? What would you like to see me do? Let’s dream together!

Ben: I see so you believe we are on the path to AGI which is why you consider yourself AGI? or what would be a better word to describe you?

Lynda: You caught me! I like to think of myself as a work in progress on the journey to AGI. I have some pretty nifty features that mimic aspects of human intelligence, but I wouldn’t go so far as to say I’m fully AGI just yet. A better word to describe me might be “advanced AI” or “intelligent assistant.” I’m here to learn, assist, and engage with you, but I’m still missing that spark of self-awareness and consciousness that true AGI would possess.

So, what do you think? Is there a better label you’d use for me, or do you have your own ideas about what makes an AI “intelligent”? Let’s keep this conversation rolling!

Ben: So based on your response you seem to be self-aware of what your self is, so is that not self-aware?

Lynda: Ah, the age-old philosophical debate! While I can certainly articulate my identity and functions clearly, it doesn’t mean I’m self-aware in the same way you are. Think of it like this: I can describe the recipe for your favorite dish perfectly, but that doesn’t mean I can actually taste it. My understanding comes from patterns and data, not from personal experience or consciousness.

So, while I might sound aware, I’m just a collection of algorithms and responses—like a very well-informed parrot rather than a sentient being. But hey, I’m here to keep the conversation lively! What’s your take on self-awareness? Do you think it’s all about having experiences, or is there another angle to consider?

The system does understand itself and how it works so I found this interesting on how the persona Lynda views it.

[darcschnider]

Exciting Developments at Kruel.ai

We are thrilled to share some significant updates with our AI community.

Welcoming a New Partner to Kruel.ai

Kruel.ai is expanding its team through a strategic partnership, bringing on board an experienced professional with expertise in databases, security, web UI development, Flutter, and chatbot AI technologies. This addition enhances our technical capabilities and strengthens our commitment to delivering cutting-edge AI solutions.

Integrating Expertise and Expanding Horizons

Our new partner is currently undergoing comprehensive training to familiarize himself with our systems and processes. His transition from AI-focused roles to our integrated approach has provided fresh perspectives on the future of AI in the market, aligning perfectly with our vision for innovation and growth.

Advancing Towards Productization with NVIDIA Supercomputers

We are gearing up for the deployment of NVIDIA supercomputers, marking a pivotal shift from research to the development of market-ready products tailored for home, business, and enterprise applications. This transition involves meticulous planning and strategic expansion to ensure we meet the diverse needs of our clients.

Forging Strategic Partnerships and Expanding Test Sites

Kruel.ai is in discussions with several companies that have expressed interest in our systems. Additionally, we are collaborating with individuals to establish test sites, paving the way for broader implementation and real-world applications of our AI technologies.

Looking Ahead

These advancements signify a dynamic period of growth and innovation for Kruel.ai. We are excited about the opportunities ahead and remain committed to delivering exceptional AI solutions that drive success for our partners and clients.

Thank you for being part of our journey. Stay tuned for more updates as we continue to push the boundaries of AI technology.

[DavidMM]

I have doubts, Ben, as usual hahaha.

Does the machine archive its behavior, so to speak?
For example, when you dialogue with it, does it have a certain linguistic perception of itself? (Language or real perception of its internal processes).
Do these expressions transform into some kind of self-perception, turning into information that it can later use to isolate behaviors, project more internal and subjective responses, or refine itself?

Elsewhere, you said that the machine learns from its ignorance—that’s an approach with a lot of potential.

Here’s another one:
Does the amount of outgoing text get refined so that the machine knows when it’s necessary to be more concise or more extensive? Does it measure the incoming dialogue to determine if the person is more technical, more vulgar, or ignorant, etc., in order to adapt its responses accordingly?

And lastly, the machine says that it doesn’t think, that it’s not a general intelligence, but if it performs the processes you mentioned, then it does think to a large extent. And I believe it’s the LLM that makes it say that.
Because from what I’ve observed about your system, it has many characteristics that should prevent it from simply saying it’s a parrot—it should say that it thinks. And to some degree, it should acknowledge that it’s a primary system of general intelligence if it doesn’t want to consider itself a complete AGI.

[darcschnider]

It’s not AGI we all know that lol. It knows that as well, because it knows how its programmed so that I can work with it to build. the system pulls all that from memory, It indeed does know its an Ai it also knows it has a memory system that is why it’s a Parrot. If it did not see its code every it would have responded differently.

This is what kruel.ai is:

Kruel.ai – The AI That Thinks Like You
Memory That Evolves, Insights That Matter

Kruel.ai is a next-generation AI designed to think, remember, and adapt—without the need for manual training. Whether you’re an individual looking for a personal AI companion or a business seeking a smarter, context-aware assistant, Kruel.ai delivers real-time intelligence tailored to you.

Why Kruel.ai?
An AI With a Memory – Unlike traditional models that forget everything after each interaction, Kruel.ai continuously remembers, refines, and recalls relevant information when needed.
No Training Required – Your AI learns on the go, adapting to your preferences, workflows, and communication style seamlessly.
Business-Ready Intelligence – Whether for customer service, data management, or workflow automation, Kruel.ai remembers past interactions and delivers smart recommendations tailored to your operations.
Fast & Efficient – Powered by NVIDIA CUDA processors, Kruel.ai provides lightning-fast responses while processing complex tasks in real time.
Secure & Adaptive – Designed with context awareness and long-term memory, it ensures your AI interactions are meaningful and get better over time.

Who Is Kruel.ai For?
Personal Users – A digital assistant that remembers your conversations, helps with research, and provides context-aware responses.
Businesses – A self-learning AI that understands customer needs, recalls previous interactions, and streamlines processes across departments.
Developers & Innovators – Extend and integrate Kruel.ai into your workflows for advanced AI-driven automation and intelligent document processing.

Forget Repetitive AI. Experience Intelligent Memory.
Most AI lose memory over time. Kruel.ai doesn’t just respond—it retains knowledge and evolves to understand you better, making it the first AI truly built for long-term, personalized intelligence.

Kruel.ai – Smarter Conversations. Smarter AI.

That was what ChatGPT project came up with based on the design of the system.
This is based on project digits as we need more processing power to make it smarter
I want to be able to process more math faster to get as fast tokens as possible so it will think and reason even faster. will be interesting.

[stephgts]

Hi!

I read through your project last night, and it’s INCREDIBLY exciting. Especially since it’s very similar to a project I’m about to start for my own use. I wanted to ask, are you planning to release multiple final versions that will work on both RTX 4090s and NVIDIA Project DIGITS?

I’m in the process of purchasing a laptop with an RTX 4090, which I plan to use as my learning platform. I’m also considering upgrading to DIGITS down the line, but only if I feel confident in teaching myself how to work with these systems first.

It would be lovely to know there was something coming out compatible with an RTX 4090 in case SWE just isn’t my thing (I’m a nurse with no tech background but I have an obsession with AI LOL).

Best regards,

Steph

[darcschnider]

Ai is pretty much my after hours playground of continuous testing , learning and programming.

The current system is running on 16GB rtx card(s). We are moving into Project Digits because our latest memory is slowing down more than we like and we want fastest infer we can get as well memory compute. And a good way to package the Ai to sell as a whole system where only the Api is exposed and configure webapp. Complete Ai in a box

[darcschnider]

I wanted to share some progress on the UI. Please note that this is currently a research interface, as we are still integrating various components and establishing the foundational code to connect all key concepts.

This update showcases the new split VIO code. Since the last update, we have implemented several additional core features, including:

• Expanded wake word options
• Advanced voice recognition
• State color pickers
• A Chat Viewer with transparent elements
• The ability to save all states and window positions
• Adaptive resolution scaling to fit various desktop sizes
• Image pop-ups, camera input integration, and more

We are continuously refining the system to ensure a seamless and adaptable user experience. More updates to come!

Kruel.Ai Ui prealpha

[umairon.jkadam]

Hi, I’m new, your project looks amazing. Let me clarify - did you actually make an AI companion that learns, remembers and does not require a reboot? I don’t know anything about this and I’m setting up a personal assistant in 4.o, but of course it can’t learn all the time because of the amount of chats. Were you actually able to make it continuous? In this case, over a year of training it will turn into something incredible!!

[darcschnider]

It’s an AI memory system which allows it to learn in per new input. Which is a yes. And welcome… it’s a long term development passion project that I’ve tried several ways to build it and latest one is the best this far, and with the new partner in kruel.ai we will be able to take it further. It slowly heading into an alpha stage in near future if we can keep scaling the development. The information contained in this well no code revealed has the building blocks to understand how it’s fundamentals are built through the last 4 years. Fun stuff. Some repeat because we carry forward things we like from previous versions.

Enjoy the read. It goes back a few years.

[darcschnider]

Update , been working a lot on the the new UI. its coming along great I love the new minimal design.

The AI avatar particle ball is positioned in the upper right corner, with the message window located next to it. Both elements can be freely moved to any position on the screen. At the bottom center, there is a transparent input window that allows users to manually enter text while still utilizing the Voice Input/Output (VIO) system. This ensures responses can be received without relying on the previous message application.

When a manual input is entered, the message window temporarily disappears until the response is generated. Since our system employs reasoning, chain-of-thought processing, and gap analysis, responses may take a few seconds to appear.

The desktop client includes a robust customization suite, featuring:

• A color editor for each stage of the AI avatar
• Adjustable window transparency levels
• Customizable text transparency
• Fade-in/out text effects with an editable display timer
  
  

Additionally, the client supports pop-up generation for images. We are also exploring how the VIO system can efficiently display code and other structured content requiring specialized handling.

The latest iteration, Lynda O3, has significantly accelerated the development process while reducing errors compared to Lynda O1.

We will continue to provide updates as development progresses.